Narrog (2012): Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change #
This file formalizes the category hierarchy and the category-climbing hypothesis of
[Nar12]. Scope data from Japanese order the grammatical categories of the verbal
clause from voice and benefactives at the bottom through aspect, dynamic and deontic
modality, negation and epistemic modality, and tense to mood and illocutionary
modification at the top (GramCategory, GramCategory.scopeLevel), an empirical
hierarchy finer than the stipulated universal one of [Cin99]; epistemic modality
outscopes deontic and dynamic modality, and mood outscopes modality proper
(epistemic_outscopes_deontic, mood_outscopes_modality). Scope level determines speaker
orientation (scope_implies_orientation), and the non-modal categories that are only
diachronic sources of modality lie strictly below those that are only its targets
(GramCategory.IsSource, GramCategory.IsTarget, source_below_target), the structural
precondition of the hypothesis that semantic change involving grammatical categories climbs
from narrower to wider scope.
Implementation notes #
The scope levels follow the combined hierarchy of the book's third chapter, categories on
a shared level being unordered. Possession, directionals, and the two kinds of
honorification, which the book's table of source and target categories also lists, are not
in the scope hierarchy and are left out. The most frequent attested changes of modal meaning
are tabulated in Studies/Narrog2010, and the last section checks them against the scale.
TODO #
The book derives a category's role as source or target from its scope level relative to the
modal categories. IsSource and IsTarget transcribe the table; deriving them turns on
whether the speculative category on the level of volitive mood counts as modality or as mood.
References #
Speech act orientation at the three positions labelled on the vertical axis of the book's semantic map. The book treats the dimension as gradual and open-ended, a property of a use that follows from performativity, and gives most modal categories a broad range of positions.
- eventOriented : SpeechActOrientation
The modal judgment concerns conditions on the described event and its participants.
- speakerOriented : SpeechActOrientation
The modal judgment is the speaker's own at the time of speech.
- speechActOriented : SpeechActOrientation
The use is tied to the speech act itself, including the hearer and the discourse. Clausal mood and illocutionary modification lie here.
Instances For
Equations
- Narrog2012.instDecidableEqSpeechActOrientation x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The positions are ordered as they are listed, from the event-oriented pole upwards. A change
of use from o to o' conforms to the directionality hypothesis when o ≤ o'.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Grammatical categories relevant to the verbal clause, drawn from [Nar12] Tables 3.5–3.9 and [Nar09].
The categories are ordered by empirical scope from Japanese data:
lower scope (event-oriented) to wider scope (speech-act-oriented).
Categories at the same scope level are grouped into a shared
scopeLevel.
- voice : GramCategory
- benefactive : GramCategory
- phasalAspect : GramCategory
- dynamicModality : GramCategory
- perfImperfAspect : GramCategory
- deontic1 : GramCategory
- evidentiality1 : GramCategory
- negation : GramCategory
- epistemic1 : GramCategory
- evidentiality2 : GramCategory
- tense : GramCategory
- deontic2 : GramCategory
- epistemic2 : GramCategory
- evidentiality3 : GramCategory
- epistemic3 : GramCategory
- volitiveMood : GramCategory
- illocutionaryMod : GramCategory
Instances For
Equations
- Narrog2012.instDecidableEqGramCategory x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Narrog2012.instReprGramCategory = { reprPrec := Narrog2012.instReprGramCategory.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Empirical scope level from Japanese data ([Nar09], [Nar12] Tables 3.5–3.7, 3.9). Lower number = narrower scope.
Multiple categories can share a level; the ordering between categories at the same level is not empirically established.
Level assignments follow the groupings established in the text (p. 97): "Evidentiality 3 and Epistemic modality 2... are located on the same level as Tense"; "Epistemic modality 1 and Evidentiality 2... are located at the same level as (Internal) negation." Non-modal anchors (Tense, Negation, Perf/Imperf, Phasal aspect) and the modal categories listed alongside them share the same level.
Equations
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.voice.scopeLevel = 0
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.benefactive.scopeLevel = 0
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.phasalAspect.scopeLevel = 1
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.dynamicModality.scopeLevel = 1
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.perfImperfAspect.scopeLevel = 2
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.deontic1.scopeLevel = 2
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality1.scopeLevel = 2
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.negation.scopeLevel = 3
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic1.scopeLevel = 3
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality2.scopeLevel = 3
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.tense.scopeLevel = 4
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.deontic2.scopeLevel = 4
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic2.scopeLevel = 4
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality3.scopeLevel = 4
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic3.scopeLevel = 5
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.volitiveMood.scopeLevel = 5
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.illocutionaryMod.scopeLevel = 6
Instances For
Categories are compared by scope level, categories on one level lying below each other.
Equations
Equations
- Narrog2012.instDecidableLEGramCategory a b = { decide := a.scopeLevel.ble b.scopeLevel, reflects_decide := ⋯ }
Equations
- Narrog2012.instDecidableLTGramCategory a b = { decide := a.scopeLevel.succ.ble b.scopeLevel, reflects_decide := ⋯ }
Epistemic modality outscopes deontic modality.
Dynamic modality (ability) has narrower scope than deontic.
Mood outscopes all levels of modality proper.
Illocutionary modification is the widest-scope category.
Map a category to its speaker-orientation level in Narrog's 2D map.
Categories below the aspect boundary are event-oriented; categories at the modal level are speaker-oriented; mood and illocutionary modification are speech act-oriented.
At scope level 2, event-oriented (perfective aspect) and speaker-oriented
(deontic 1, evidentiality 1) categories coexist, reflecting Narrog's
observation (p. 97, point 4) that volitive modalities rank low due to
descriptive use. The mapping is therefore approximate at the
event/speaker boundary; see scope_implies_orientation for the
precise (strict <) relationship.
Equations
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.voice.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.eventOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.benefactive.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.eventOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.phasalAspect.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.eventOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.dynamicModality.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.eventOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.perfImperfAspect.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.eventOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.deontic1.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.deontic2.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic1.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic2.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality1.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality2.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.evidentiality3.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.negation.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.tense.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speakerOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.epistemic3.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speechActOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.volitiveMood.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speechActOriented
- Narrog2012.GramCategory.illocutionaryMod.toOrientation = Narrog2012.SpeechActOrientation.speechActOriented
Instances For
Strict scope increase implies non-decreasing orientation.
If category a is strictly narrower in scope than b, then a's
orientation is no higher than b's. This is the formal link between
Narrog's Hypothesis I (category climbing: narrow → wide scope) and
Hypothesis II (event-oriented → speech-act-oriented).
The theorem requires strict < rather than ≤ because at the
boundary between event-oriented and speaker-oriented categories
(scope level 2), perfective/imperfective aspect (event-oriented) and
deontic modality 1 (speaker-oriented) share the same scope level.
Narrog (p. 97, point 4) notes this: volitive categories rank low in
the scope hierarchy due to their descriptive use, even though their
performative use is high.
The non-modal categories from which modal markers may derive, in the book's table of potential source and target categories for modality: voice and benefactives, and aspect, tense, and negation, which the table lists as both source and target.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The non-modal categories into which modal markers may develop: mood and illocutionary modification, and aspect, tense, and negation.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Every category that is only a source has strictly narrower scope than every category that is only a target, the structural precondition for category climbing.
The categories that are only sources are event-oriented.
The categories that are only targets are speech act-oriented.
The lowest position a use of a meaning tabulated in [Nar10a] can take: the directive moods lie at the speech act-oriented end, and modality proper and the future reach down to the event-oriented pole.
Equations
- Narrog2012.minOrientation m = if m.IsMood then ⊤ else ⊥
Instances For
Every tabulated change into mood conforms to the directionality hypothesis wherever the source use lay.
A change out of mood would not conform unless its target were again speech act-oriented;
none is tabulated (Narrog2010.source_not_isMood).