Documentation

Studies.Halpert2019

Halpert (2019): Raising, Unphased #

This file formalizes [Hal19]'s derivation of cross-linguistic variation in raising-to-subject without the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Two properties of a clausal complement do the work, Clause: whether it is a φ-goal that matrix T interacts with, and whether it can satisfy the EPP by moving to Spec,TP, together with whether T has an EPP at all. The engine is Syntax/Minimalist/Probe/Basic.lean's Probe, whose search a φ-bearing clause halts, Probe.sat, and which Agrees with the goal it halts on when that goal can occupy Spec,TP, Probe.int, so the matrix-T EPP probe is eppProbe and the derivation it drives is raisingOutcome. When the closest clause interacts but cannot satisfy the EPP it absorbs the probe, and T probes a second time ([RR05]), reaching the embedded subject, hyper-raising, when it genuinely Agreed with the clause (section 4.3), and stalling in defective intervention when it did not, the English that-clause of section 5.3. The attested profiles follow from the engine: English, english_profile; Zulu, zulu_profile; Uyghur, uyghur_profile (section 4.5); and Makhuwa and Matengo, which lack the EPP, makhuwa_no_raising (section 5.1). Phasehood is thereby relativized to φ-probes rather than a fixed condition (Syntax/Minimalist/Phase.lean): finite CPs and nonfinite TPs of the same size get opposite raising outcomes across languages, finite_cp_outcome_not_size_driven and nonfinite_tp_outcome_not_size_driven.

Implementation notes #

raisingOutcome is deterministic, so the optionality of Zulu hyper-raising out of a finite clause, where an expletive non-raising variant coexists with it, is abstracted over, as are the tend, happen, and keep selection matrix and the adjectival versus verbal small-clause split of English.

References #

A clausal complement, classified by the three probe-relevant properties Halpert's account turns on.

  • interacts : Bool

    T's φ-probe halts on it: a φ-goal, or a defective nominal intervener (the English that-CP). Transparent clauses (English nonfinite TP, small clauses) are not interveners.

  • canAgree : Bool

    T can Agree with it (copy φ) — a genuine φ-goal. The English that-CP interacts but has no φ to copy ([Mou09]).

  • canSatisfyEPP : Bool

    It can satisfy the EPP by moving to Spec,TP (Zulu infinitival TP, Uyghur DP-nominalization), vs. clauses barred from Spec,TP (Zulu finite CP, Uyghur NP-nominalization).

Instances For
    def Halpert2019.instDecidableEqClause.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Clause) :
    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      def Halpert2019.instReprClause.repr :
      Clause → ℕ → Std.Format
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations

        A goal the matrix-T EPP probe ranges over, in c-command order: the clausal complement (closest) then the embedded subject.

        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations
          def Halpert2019.instReprGoal.repr :
          Goal → ℕ → Std.Format
          Equations
          Instances For

            The matrix-T EPP probe, whose search an intervening φ-bearing clause halts and which Agrees with the goal it halts on when that goal can occupy Spec,TP. The embedded subject is a movable φ-goal, halting and EPP-satisfying. [Dea15]'s interaction is the halting here and satisfaction the Agree, the reverse of [Dea25a]'s algorithm, on which the second probing of section 4.3 is one Probe.run whose interacting clause does not satisfy the probe.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              def Halpert2019.goals (c : Clause) :
              List Goal

              The clause c-commands the embedded subject.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The five raising outcomes Halpert's typology distinguishes.

                • noRaising : RaisingOutcome

                  No EPP: T Agrees with the clause in situ, nothing moves (Makhuwa, Matengo).

                • subjectRaises : RaisingOutcome

                  Ordinary raising: the embedded subject moves to matrix Spec,TP (English nonfinite TP).

                • clauseRaises : RaisingOutcome

                  The whole clause satisfies the EPP and moves (Zulu infinitival TP, Uyghur DP-nominalization).

                • hyperRaises : RaisingOutcome

                  A second Agree reaches the embedded subject (Zulu finite CP, Uyghur NP-nominalization).

                • blocked : RaisingOutcome

                  A defective intervener stalls the probe (English finite CP).

                Instances For
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The derivation, run through the canonical Probe engine. With no EPP nothing moves. With an EPP, matrix T runs eppProbe.agree over [clause, subject]: a transparent clause is skipped and the subject raises; a clause that satisfies the EPP is Agreed-with and raises whole; an interacting clause that cannot satisfy the EPP absorbs the probe (Probe.agree_eq_none_of_not_int), and the licensed second probe reaches the embedded subject (hyperRaises) iff T genuinely Agreed with the clause, else stalls (blocked).

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      The derivation, from the Probe engine #

                      No EPP ⇒ no raising, whatever the clause.

                      A transparent clause (not an intervener) lets T reach the embedded subject: ordinary raising.

                      A φ-goal that satisfies the EPP raises as a whole clause; the embedded subject does not move.

                      theorem Halpert2019.raisingOutcome_eq_hyperRaises {c : Clause} (hi : c.interacts = true) (ha : c.canAgree = true) (he : c.canSatisfyEPP = false) :

                      A φ-goal that interacts but cannot satisfy the EPP absorbs the first Agree; the licensed second probe reaches the embedded subject.

                      theorem Halpert2019.raisingOutcome_eq_blocked {c : Clause} (hi : c.interacts = true) (ha : c.canAgree = false) (he : c.canSatisfyEPP = false) :

                      A defective intervener (interacts, but T cannot Agree with it) stalls the probe: no second Agree, no raising.

                      Cross-linguistic raising profiles #

                      English nonfinite TP: transparent, not an intervener.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        English finite that-CP: a defective intervener — visible, no φ to Agree, cannot move ([Mou09]).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Zulu small clause: transparent.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Zulu infinitival TP: a φ-goal that satisfies the EPP.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Zulu finite ukuthi-CP: a φ-goal that cannot satisfy the EPP.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Uyghur DP-nominalization (non-modal adjective): φ-goal, satisfies the EPP ([Asa11]).

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Uyghur NP-nominalization (modal adjective): φ-goal, cannot satisfy the EPP.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    English raising profile ([Hal19]): raising is required out of a nonfinite TP and blocked out of a finite CP. (Models the seem/be likely predicates; the tend/happen/keep selection matrix and the AP/NP-vs-VP small-clause split are not modelled.)

                                    Zulu raising profile ([Hal19], building on [Ura94]'s hyper-raising): hyper-raising out of a finite CP, the whole clause raises out of a nonfinite TP (so the subject does not), and the subject raises out of a small clause. The finite-CP case is in fact optional — an expletive ku- non-raising variant coexists with hyper-raising, and the ku-/u- morphology spells out first- vs. second-Agree — an optionality this deterministic RaisingOutcome abstracts over.

                                    Uyghur raising profile ([Asa11], [Hal19]): a DP-nominalization raises whole; an NP-nominalization hyper-raises the embedded subject.

                                    Makhuwa/Matengo: removing just the EPP from the Zulu setting kills raising entirely — even out of a finite-CP φ-goal.

                                    Raising is unphased #

                                    The thesis: a finite CP yields hyper-raising in Zulu but is blocked in English — same clause "size", opposite outcomes — because the split is φ-goal status (canAgree), not a size-driven phase boundary.

                                    Likewise a nonfinite TP: the whole clause raises in Zulu but the subject raises in English — the split is EPP-satisfaction (canSatisfyEPP), not clause size.