Geurts (2010): Quantity Implicatures #
This file formalizes the textbook's case against conventionalism in section 7.3 of [Geu10],
which rests on [GP09]'s verification experiment. Conventionalist theories of
scalar inference agree that some is read as some but not all under an upward-entailing
quantifier such as all or more than one, and the stronger versions predict the same under a
non-monotone quantifier such as exactly two, while none predicts it under a downward-entailing
one; the experiment found no such readings. The three quantifiers of (62) are the earlier study's
Quant, and the weak and strong predictions are its PredictsLocalSIWeak and PredictsLocalSI
(conventionalist_predictions). Chapter 3's observation that a downward-entailing environment
reverses a scale, so that not all blocks the local inference, is the negated case
(downward_entailing_blocks).
References #
Exactly two is not upward entailing in its scope: two of three squares connected with some circle, all three with some circle or other.
Not all is not upward entailing in its scope.
Section 7.3, (62): every conventionalist theory predicts the local reading under all and more than one; only the stronger versions predict it under exactly two, which is neither upward nor downward entailing in its scope.
Section 3.2: the downward-entailing scope of not all supports no local inference on either version of the prediction.