Documentation

Studies.Cruse1973

Cruse (1973): Some thoughts on agentivity #

Cruse replaces the referential definitions of agentivity, Fillmore's animate perceived instigator and Gruber's wilful source, by an entailment test: a noun is a doer in a sentence when the sentence entails that the noun did something. The test admits inanimate doers, process verbs and statives, against the received opinions, and what it detects is heterogeneous: at least four features each suffice for doing, the volitive, the effective, the initiative and the agentive, an instrument bearing none of them, and each has contextual diagnostics of its own.

A noun's profile is the set of features its sentence attributes to it, so a doer is a noun with a nonempty profile. The paper's examples are checked against the normality each frame predicts from the profile, the three received opinions are refuted among them, and Gruber's criteria of agentivity, as the paper reanalyzes them, pick out strictly nested classes of nouns.

Implementation notes #

References #

The features whose presence makes a noun a doer.

  • volitive : Feature

    An act of will is stated or implied.

  • effective : Feature

    The noun exerts a force by virtue of its position or motion, not of its own energy.

  • initiative : Feature

    The noun initiates the action by giving a command.

  • agentive : Feature

    The noun uses its own energy in carrying out the action.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations

    The sources the features attribute are the self-energetic ones: an instrument, whose user supplies its energy, is no doer.

    @[reducible, inline]

    The features a sentence attributes to a noun in relation to its verb.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The frames the paper places a sentence in.

      • doForm : Frame

        What X did was …, for a subject.

      • happenForm : Frame

        What happened to X was that …, for a subject.

      • entails : Frame

        X VP entails X did something, or the normality of X VP: it therefore follows that X did something, for a subject or an object.

      • purpose : Frame

        A purpose phrase in order to ….

      • imperative : Frame

        The imperative.

      • carefully : Frame

        Modification by carefully.

      • reflexive : Frame

        Reflexivization of an ergative verb used intransitively, or V oneself Adj for a non-ergative, with minor rather than considerable semantic effects.

      • manner : Frame

        A manner adverb of energy output, powerfully, vigorously or energetically, for gross physical actions.

      • causative : Frame

        Transitive fly with the noun as its object.

      • initiativeDenial : Frame

        A context denying a precondition of initiation by command.

      • progressive : Frame

        The progressive form, Lyons's criterion for stativity.

      • plain : Frame

        The sentence itself.

      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations

        Normality of a sentence in a frame as the paper's diagnostics predict it from the noun's profile. The paper claims only that each feature suffices for the do form; that a noun with no feature is no doer is read off its happen-sentences. The progressive tests the verb's stativity, on which the profile places no constraint.

        Equations
        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          instance Cruse1973.instDecidablePredProfileNormal (t : Frame) :
          DecidablePred t.Normal
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

          Lyons's verb classes at issue in the received opinions.

          • process : VerbClass

            An obligatorily process verb, die.

          • stative : VerbClass

            A stative verb, stand, have.

          Instances For
            @[instance_reducible]
            Equations

            Gruber's criteria #

            Gruber's criteria of agentivity, as the paper reanalyzes them, pick out strictly nested classes of nouns: carefully detects the volitive and the agentive together, the purpose phrase the volitive, and the do form any feature.

            The paper's examples #

            def Cruse1973.Frame.labels :
            List (String × Frame)

            The frames by their paperFeatures labels.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              def Cruse1973.Profile.labels :
              List (String × Profile)

              The profiles by their paperFeatures labels; an instrumental bears no feature.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                structure Cruse1973.Row :

                An example of the paper, with its frame, the profile of its noun, its judgment, and whether it states that an entailment fails.

                • frame : Frame
                • profile : Option Profile

                  The profile attributed to the noun, if any; the stative and some ambiguous examples carry none.

                • inferred : Bool

                  Whether the attribution is the study's rather than the paper's.

                • inanimate : Bool

                  Whether the noun is marked inanimate.

                • verbClass : Option VerbClass

                  The verb's class, where a received opinion is at issue.

                • neutralized : Bool

                  Whether do and happen are neutralized, as in why does the door do that.

                • judgment : Judgment
                • denied : Bool

                  The example states that the entailment fails, X VP does not entail X did something.

                Instances For
                  def Cruse1973.Row.ofDatum (e : Datum) :
                  Option Row

                  An example read into its frame, profile and judgment.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    theorem Cruse1973.isSome_ofDatum (e : Datum) :
                    e ∈ Examples.all → (Row.ofDatum e).isSome = true

                    Every example names its frame.

                    The paper's examples.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      theorem Cruse1973.acceptable_iff_normal (d : Row) :
                      d ∈ data → d.neutralized = false → ∀ p ∈ d.profile, d.judgment = Judgment.acceptable ∧ d.denied = false ↔ d.frame.Normal p

                      The paper reports a sentence normal in its frame, printing it unmarked and not denying its entailment, exactly when its noun's profile predicts it, neutralization aside.

                      theorem Cruse1973.exists_neutralized_doForm :
                      ∃ d ∈ data, d.neutralized = true ∧ d.profile = some ∅ ∧ d.frame = Frame.doForm ∧ d.judgment = Judgment.acceptable

                      Where do and happen are neutralized, the do form is normal though the noun bears no feature: why does the door do that?

                      Against the received opinions #

                      An inanimate noun is a doer: the wind, the computer, the bullet.

                      A process verb has a do-interpretation: dying in order to save us.

                      A stative verb has a do-interpretation: standing, having one's passport ready.

                      The heterogeneity of doing #

                      theorem Cruse1973.exists_doer_of_feature (f : Feature) :
                      f ∈ [Feature.volitive, Feature.effective] → ∃ d ∈ data, d.inferred = false ∧ d.profile = some {f} ∧ d.frame = Frame.doForm ∧ d.judgment = Judgment.acceptable

                      The volitive and the effective each make a doer alone on the paper's own attribution: drifting so as to avoid enemy territory, the flying stone breaking the window. The agentive alone, as in sneezing, rests on the study's attribution.