Cruse (1973): Some thoughts on agentivity #
Cruse replaces the referential definitions of agentivity, Fillmore's animate perceived instigator and Gruber's wilful source, by an entailment test: a noun is a doer in a sentence when the sentence entails that the noun did something. The test admits inanimate doers, process verbs and statives, against the received opinions, and what it detects is heterogeneous: at least four features each suffice for doing, the volitive, the effective, the initiative and the agentive, an instrument bearing none of them, and each has contextual diagnostics of its own.
A noun's profile is the set of features its sentence attributes to it, so a doer is a noun with a nonempty profile. The paper's examples are checked against the normality each frame predicts from the profile, the three received opinions are refuted among them, and Gruber's criteria of agentivity, as the paper reanalyzes them, pick out strictly nested classes of nouns.
Implementation notes #
- The agentive and the effective are the features of a force bearer drawing on its own energy
and on energy imparted to it;
isSelfEnergetic_iff_exists_energySource_eqidentifies them with the self-energetic sources ofEnergySource. An instrumental bears no feature. - The paper's query mark is printed as
?; it defines the mark as clear abnormality, so a marked example counts as abnormal. - The paper leaves open the contexts that neutralize do and happen, and its examples in them are outside the model.
References #
- D. A. Cruse, Some thoughts on agentivity (1973)
- C. J. Fillmore, The case for case (1968)
- J. S. Gruber, Look and see (1967)
- M. A. K. Halliday, Notes on transitivity and theme in English: part 1 (1967)
- M. A. K. Halliday, Notes on transitivity and theme in English: part 3 (1968)
- J. Lyons, Structural semantics (1963)
- J. Lyons, Introduction to theoretical linguistics (1968)
- J. M. Anderson, The grammar of case (1971)
- W. L. Chafe, Meaning and the structure of language (1970)
The features whose presence makes a noun a doer.
- volitive : Feature
An act of will is stated or implied.
- effective : Feature
The noun exerts a force by virtue of its position or motion, not of its own energy.
- initiative : Feature
The noun initiates the action by giving a command.
- agentive : Feature
The noun uses its own energy in carrying out the action.
Instances For
Equations
- Cruse1973.instDecidableEqFeature x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Cruse1973.instFintypeFeature = { elems := { val := ↑Cruse1973.Feature.enumList, nodup := Cruse1973.Feature.enumList_nodup }, complete := Cruse1973.instFintypeFeature._proof_1 }
The energy source a feature attributes to a force bearer.
Equations
Instances For
The sources the features attribute are the self-energetic ones: an instrument, whose user supplies its energy, is no doer.
The features a sentence attributes to a noun in relation to its verb.
Equations
- Cruse1973.Profile = Finset Cruse1973.Feature
Instances For
The frames the paper places a sentence in.
- doForm : Frame
What X did was …, for a subject.
- happenForm : Frame
What happened to X was that …, for a subject.
- entails : Frame
X VP entails X did something, or the normality of X VP: it therefore follows that X did something, for a subject or an object.
- purpose : Frame
A purpose phrase in order to ….
- imperative : Frame
The imperative.
- carefully : Frame
Modification by carefully.
- reflexive : Frame
Reflexivization of an ergative verb used intransitively, or V oneself Adj for a non-ergative, with minor rather than considerable semantic effects.
- manner : Frame
A manner adverb of energy output, powerfully, vigorously or energetically, for gross physical actions.
- causative : Frame
Transitive fly with the noun as its object.
- initiativeDenial : Frame
A context denying a precondition of initiation by command.
- progressive : Frame
The progressive form, Lyons's criterion for stativity.
- plain : Frame
The sentence itself.
Instances For
Equations
- Cruse1973.instDecidableEqFrame x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Normality of a sentence in a frame as the paper's diagnostics predict it from the noun's profile. The paper claims only that each feature suffices for the do form; that a noun with no feature is no doer is read off its happen-sentences. The progressive tests the verb's stativity, on which the profile places no constraint.
Equations
- Cruse1973.Frame.doForm.Normal x✝ = Finset.Nonempty x✝
- Cruse1973.Frame.entails.Normal x✝ = Finset.Nonempty x✝
- Cruse1973.Frame.happenForm.Normal x✝ = (x✝ = ∅)
- Cruse1973.Frame.purpose.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.volitive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.imperative.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.volitive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.carefully.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.volitive ∈ x✝ ∧ Cruse1973.Feature.agentive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.reflexive.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.agentive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.manner.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.agentive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.causative.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.agentive ∈ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.initiativeDenial.Normal x✝ = (Cruse1973.Feature.initiative ∉ x✝)
- Cruse1973.Frame.progressive.Normal x✝ = True
- Cruse1973.Frame.plain.Normal x✝ = True
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- Cruse1973.instDecidableEqVerbClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Gruber's criteria #
Gruber's criteria of agentivity, as the paper reanalyzes them, pick out strictly nested classes of nouns: carefully detects the volitive and the agentive together, the purpose phrase the volitive, and the do form any feature.
The paper's examples #
The frames by their paperFeatures labels.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The profiles by their paperFeatures labels; an instrumental bears no feature.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
An example of the paper, with its frame, the profile of its noun, its judgment, and whether it states that an entailment fails.
- frame : Frame
- profile : Option Profile
The profile attributed to the noun, if any; the stative and some ambiguous examples carry none.
- inferred : Bool
Whether the attribution is the study's rather than the paper's.
- inanimate : Bool
Whether the noun is marked inanimate.
- verbClass : Option VerbClass
The verb's class, where a received opinion is at issue.
- neutralized : Bool
Whether do and happen are neutralized, as in why does the door do that.
- judgment : Judgment
- denied : Bool
The example states that the entailment fails, X VP does not entail X did something.
Instances For
An example read into its frame, profile and judgment.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every example names its frame.
The paper's examples.
Equations
- Cruse1973.data = List.filterMap Cruse1973.Row.ofDatum Cruse1973.Examples.all
Instances For
The paper reports a sentence normal in its frame, printing it unmarked and not denying its entailment, exactly when its noun's profile predicts it, neutralization aside.
Where do and happen are neutralized, the do form is normal though the noun bears no feature: why does the door do that?
Against the received opinions #
An inanimate noun is a doer: the wind, the computer, the bullet.
A process verb has a do-interpretation: dying in order to save us.
A stative verb has a do-interpretation: standing, having one's passport ready.
The heterogeneity of doing #
The volitive and the effective each make a doer alone on the paper's own attribution: drifting so as to avoid enemy territory, the flying stone breaking the window. The agentive alone, as in sneezing, rests on the study's attribution.