Breiss, Katsuda and Kawahara 2026: modelling frequency-conditioned paradigm uniformity #
In conservative Japanese dialects a compound whose second member (N2) begins with /g/ realises it as [ŋ], but only optionally when the N2 is also a free word, which begins with [g]. Nasalisation is then more likely the more frequent the compound and less likely the more frequent the free N2. Breiss, Katsuda and Kawahara derive both effects in a MaxEnt grammar under Breiss's Voting Bases model, where a faithfulness violation counts in proportion to the resting activation of the listed form it is assessed against. The free N2 is listed with [g] and an existing compound with [ŋ], so the two effects take opposite signs.
The fitted grammar gives the markedness constraint against medial [g] no weight, against Itô and Mester's markedness-driven account; activation raises faithfulness, where Coetzee and Kawahara let frequency lower it; and the sign of each effect follows from the listed velars, where the earlier output–output account of the same authors stipulated it.
Main definitions #
Item: a compound's listed bases, an optional free N2 and an optional whole compound.con,violations,votingBases: the constraints (6), the violation vectors scaled by an item's activations, and the MaxEnt distribution of the item's realisations.pNasal: the probability of nasalisation.table1: the fitted weights.
Main results #
pNasal_eq_sigmoid: the log-odds of nasalisation are the markedness weight plus each base's weighted activation, signed by its listed velar.existing_strictAnti_n2,existing_strictMono_compound,novel_strictAnti_n2: the frequency effects of Figures 2 and 3.logit_pNasal_existing: the N2 effect on the log-odds is the same in existing and novel compounds.existing_lt_bound: a free N2 lowers nasalisation below that of a bound N2.table1_novel_lt_half: under the fitted weights a novel compound nasalises less than half the time.tableau7,tableau8,tableau9: the schematic tableaux.
Implementation notes #
- A candidate is the realisation of the compound-medial velar, and identity in [nasal] to a base is one violation when the two velars differ.
- The tableaux display activation-scaled violations and the prose speaks of scaled weights;
harmony_violations_eqshows the two agree. Scaling the violations keeps the weights the grammar's, shared across items, so the log-likelihood theory ofHarmonicGrammar.maxEntapplies to the fit of Table 1. - Tableau (8b) prints 0.91 for harmonies 2.7 and 0.5, which give σ(2.2) < 0.905
(
pNasal_tableau8b_lt). - The caption of Table 1 describes weights fitted to existing and novel compounds combined, while
§5.2 evaluates them as the grammar fitted to existing compounds;
table1_novel_lt_halfholds on either reading. - The model gives a bound-N2 compound a probability below 1, so the exceptionless nasalisation of (5) is not derived; the modelled experiment has no bound N2s.
References #
The compound-medial velar, oral [g] or nasal [ŋ].
Instances For
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.instDecidableEqVelar x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
A listed allomorph, given by its medial velar and its resting activation.
- velar : Velar
- activation : ℝ
Instances For
A compound's listed bases (§4.1), the free-standing N2 if the N2 is free and the whole compound if it is an existing word.
Instances For
A free N2 is listed with the [g] it shows word-initially.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.freeN2 a = { velar := BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.Velar.oral, activation := a }
Instances For
An existing compound is listed with its medial velar nasalised.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.storedCompound b = { velar := BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.Velar.nasal, activation := b }
Instances For
A novel compound with a free N2.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.novel a = { n2 := some (BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.freeN2 a), compound := none }
Instances For
An existing compound with a free N2.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.existing a b = { n2 := some (BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.freeN2 a), compound := some (BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.storedCompound b) }
Instances For
An existing compound with a bound N2.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.bound b = { n2 := none, compound := some (BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.storedCompound b) }
Instances For
Constraints, scaled violations, and the MaxEnt probability #
Identity in [nasal] to an optional listed base (6b, c) is violated when the candidate's velar differs from the base's, and never without a base.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.idNasal (some β) = OptimalityTheory.Constraint.binary fun (x : BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.Velar) => x ≠ β.velar
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.idNasal none = 0
Instances For
The constraint set (6), *INTERNAL-[g] and identity in [nasal] to the N2 and to the
compound.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The resting activation of an optional base, zero without one.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.activation (some β) = β.activation
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.activation none = 0
Instances For
The activations by which an item scales the violations of (6) (§4.2), each faithfulness constraint's by the activation of its base and markedness's not at all.
Equations
Instances For
The violation vector of a candidate realisation of an item, its violations of (6) scaled by the item's activations, as the tableaux display them.
Equations
Instances For
The weights of the three constraints.
- markedness : ℝ
- n2 : ℝ
- compound : ℝ
Instances For
The weights as a vector indexed like con.
Equations
- w.vec = ![w.markedness, w.n2, w.compound]
Instances For
The Voting Bases grammar's MaxEnt distribution of an item's realisations.
Equations
Instances For
The probability that the compound nasalises.
Equations
Instances For
The harmony of a realisation weighs each faithfulness violation by its base's activation.
Scaling the violations by the activations is scaling the weights by them (§4.2, §6.3).
A base's pull toward nasalisation is its activation, signed by its listed velar.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pull (some { velar := BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.Velar.oral, activation := a }) = -a
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pull (some { velar := BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.Velar.nasal, activation := a }) = a
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pull none = 0
Instances For
The probability of nasalisation is the sigmoid of the markedness weight plus the weighted pulls of the two bases, so each frequency effect takes the sign of its base's listed velar.
The frequency effects #
An existing compound with a free N2 nasalises with probability σ(w_M − w_N2·a + w_C·b).
A novel compound has no whole-compound base.
A bound N2 (5) has no free base.
The N2 effect on the log-odds of nasalisation is the same in an existing compound as in a novel one, the stored compound adding a constant, so the frequency effect is uniform across existing and novel compounds (§3.2).
Only a free N2 is listed with [g], so a free N2 lowers nasalisation below that of a bound N2 under the same compound, (2)–(4) against (5).
A bound-N2 compound nasalises at least half the time under nonnegative weights, whatever its frequency.
With *INTERNAL-[g] at zero weight nasalisation is the majority outcome exactly when the
compound base's weighted activation exceeds the N2 base's (§5.1, §6.2).
The fitted grammar #
The fitted weights of Table 1.
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.table1 = { markedness := 0, n2 := 7.39, compound := 7.09 }
Instances For
Under the fitted weights a novel compound, with an activation σ(f) for its N2's centred
log-frequency f (§4.4), nasalises less than half the time; §5.2 reports predicted rates from
0.002 to 0.39 against observed rates up to 0.79.
The schematic tableaux #
The weights of tableaux (7) and (8).
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.w78 = { markedness := 2, n2 := 1, compound := 1 }
Instances For
The weights of tableau (9).
Equations
- BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.w9 = { markedness := 0.1, n2 := 1, compound := 2 }
Instances For
Tableau (7) evaluates novel compounds whose N2s have activations 0.7 and 0.3, and the more active N2 pulls harder toward [g].
Tableau (8) evaluates existing compounds with N2 activation 0.5 and compound activations 0.7 and 0.3. The more active compound nasalises more, and either nasalises more than the same N2 without a stored compound.
The probability of (8b) is below 0.905, so it rounds to 0.90, not to the printed 0.91.
Tableau (9) weakens markedness and strengthens faithfulness to the compound. The nasal candidate is still the majority outcome for either compound of (8), and the compound effect keeps its sign.