Documentation

Studies.BreissKatsudaKawahara2026

Breiss, Katsuda and Kawahara 2026: modelling frequency-conditioned paradigm uniformity #

In conservative Japanese dialects a compound whose second member (N2) begins with /g/ realises it as [ŋ], but only optionally when the N2 is also a free word, which begins with [g]. Nasalisation is then more likely the more frequent the compound and less likely the more frequent the free N2. Breiss, Katsuda and Kawahara derive both effects in a MaxEnt grammar under Breiss's Voting Bases model, where a faithfulness violation counts in proportion to the resting activation of the listed form it is assessed against. The free N2 is listed with [g] and an existing compound with [ŋ], so the two effects take opposite signs.

The fitted grammar gives the markedness constraint against medial [g] no weight, against Itô and Mester's markedness-driven account; activation raises faithfulness, where Coetzee and Kawahara let frequency lower it; and the sign of each effect follows from the listed velars, where the earlier output–output account of the same authors stipulated it.

Main definitions #

Main results #

Implementation notes #

References #

The compound-medial velar, oral [g] or nasal [ŋ].

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

    A listed allomorph, given by its medial velar and its resting activation.

    • velar : Velar
    • activation : ℝ
    Instances For

      A compound's listed bases (§4.1), the free-standing N2 if the N2 is free and the whole compound if it is an existing word.

      Instances For

        A free N2 is listed with the [g] it shows word-initially.

        Equations
        Instances For

          An existing compound is listed with its medial velar nasalised.

          Equations
          Instances For

            A novel compound with a free N2.

            Equations
            Instances For

              An existing compound with a free N2.

              Equations
              Instances For

                An existing compound with a bound N2.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Constraints, scaled violations, and the MaxEnt probability #

                  Identity in [nasal] to an optional listed base (6b, c) is violated when the candidate's velar differs from the base's, and never without a base.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The constraint set (6), *INTERNAL-[g] and identity in [nasal] to the N2 and to the compound.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      The resting activation of an optional base, zero without one.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        The activations by which an item scales the violations of (6) (§4.2), each faithfulness constraint's by the activation of its base and markedness's not at all.

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          def BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.violations (it : Item) (v : Velar) :
                          Fin 3 → ℝ

                          The violation vector of a candidate realisation of an item, its violations of (6) scaled by the item's activations, as the tableaux display them.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            The weights of the three constraints.

                            • markedness : ℝ
                            • n2 : ℝ
                            • compound : ℝ
                            Instances For

                              The weights as a vector indexed like con.

                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                noncomputable def BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.votingBases (w : Weights) (it : Item) :
                                MeasureTheory.Measure Velar

                                The Voting Bases grammar's MaxEnt distribution of an item's realisations.

                                Equations
                                Instances For
                                  noncomputable def BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pNasal (w : Weights) (it : Item) :
                                  ℝ

                                  The probability that the compound nasalises.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    The harmony of a realisation weighs each faithfulness violation by its base's activation.

                                    Scaling the violations by the activations is scaling the weights by them (§4.2, §6.3).

                                    A base's pull toward nasalisation is its activation, signed by its listed velar.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For
                                      @[simp]
                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pull_freeN2 (a : ℝ) :
                                      pull (some (freeN2 a)) = -a
                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pNasal_eq_sigmoid (w : Weights) (it : Item) :
                                      pNasal w it = (w.markedness + w.n2 * pull it.n2 + w.compound * pull it.compound).sigmoid

                                      The probability of nasalisation is the sigmoid of the markedness weight plus the weighted pulls of the two bases, so each frequency effect takes the sign of its base's listed velar.

                                      The frequency effects #

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pNasal_existing (w : Weights) (a b : ℝ) :
                                      pNasal w (existing a b) = (w.markedness - w.n2 * a + w.compound * b).sigmoid

                                      An existing compound with a free N2 nasalises with probability σ(w_M − w_N2·a + w_C·b).

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pNasal_novel (w : Weights) (a : ℝ) :
                                      pNasal w (novel a) = (w.markedness - w.n2 * a).sigmoid

                                      A novel compound has no whole-compound base.

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.pNasal_bound (w : Weights) (b : ℝ) :
                                      pNasal w (bound b) = (w.markedness + w.compound * b).sigmoid

                                      A bound N2 (5) has no free base.

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.existing_strictAnti_n2 (w : Weights) (hw : 0 < w.n2) (b : ℝ) :
                                      StrictAnti fun (a : ℝ) => pNasal w (existing a b)

                                      The more active the free N2, the less an existing compound nasalises (Figure 2, right).

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.existing_strictMono_compound (w : Weights) (hw : 0 < w.compound) (a : ℝ) :
                                      StrictMono fun (b : ℝ) => pNasal w (existing a b)

                                      The more active the stored compound, the more it nasalises (Figure 2, left).

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.novel_strictAnti_n2 (w : Weights) (hw : 0 < w.n2) :
                                      StrictAnti fun (a : ℝ) => pNasal w (novel a)

                                      The N2 effect persists, with the same sign, in novel compounds (Figure 3).

                                      The N2 effect on the log-odds of nasalisation is the same in an existing compound as in a novel one, the stored compound adding a constant, so the frequency effect is uniform across existing and novel compounds (§3.2).

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.novel_lt_existing (w : Weights) (hw : 0 < w.compound) (a : ℝ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
                                      pNasal w (novel a) < pNasal w (existing a b)

                                      A stored compound's pull adds nasalisation at any N2 activation.

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.existing_lt_bound (w : Weights) (hw : 0 < w.n2) {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (b : ℝ) :
                                      pNasal w (existing a b) < pNasal w (bound b)

                                      Only a free N2 is listed with [g], so a free N2 lowers nasalisation below that of a bound N2 under the same compound, (2)–(4) against (5).

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.bound_half_le (w : Weights) (hM : 0 ≤ w.markedness) (hC : 0 ≤ w.compound) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
                                      2⁻¹ ≤ pNasal w (bound b)

                                      A bound-N2 compound nasalises at least half the time under nonnegative weights, whatever its frequency.

                                      theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.zero_markedness_iff (w : Weights) (hM : w.markedness = 0) (a b : ℝ) :
                                      2⁻¹ < pNasal w (existing a b) ↔ w.n2 * a < w.compound * b

                                      With *INTERNAL-[g] at zero weight nasalisation is the majority outcome exactly when the compound base's weighted activation exceeds the N2 base's (§5.1, §6.2).

                                      The fitted grammar #

                                      The fitted weights of Table 1.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For
                                        theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.table1_novel_lt_half (f : ℝ) :
                                        pNasal table1 (novel f.sigmoid) < 2⁻¹

                                        Under the fitted weights a novel compound, with an activation σ(f) for its N2's centred log-frequency f (§4.4), nasalises less than half the time; §5.2 reports predicted rates from 0.002 to 0.39 against observed rates up to 0.79.

                                        The schematic tableaux #

                                        The weights of tableaux (7) and (8).

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          The weights of tableau (9).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Tableau (7) evaluates novel compounds whose N2s have activations 0.7 and 0.3, and the more active N2 pulls harder toward [g].

                                            theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.tableau8 :
                                            HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.7)) w78.vec Velar.oral = -2.7 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.7)) w78.vec Velar.nasal = -0.5 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.3)) w78.vec Velar.oral = -2.3 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.3)) w78.vec Velar.nasal = -0.5 ∧ pNasal w78 (existing 0.5 0.7) = Real.sigmoid 2.2 ∧ pNasal w78 (existing 0.5 0.3) = Real.sigmoid 1.8 ∧ pNasal w78 (existing 0.5 0.3) < pNasal w78 (existing 0.5 0.7) ∧ pNasal w78 (novel 0.5) < pNasal w78 (existing 0.5 0.3)

                                            Tableau (8) evaluates existing compounds with N2 activation 0.5 and compound activations 0.7 and 0.3. The more active compound nasalises more, and either nasalises more than the same N2 without a stored compound.

                                            The probability of (8b) is below 0.905, so it rounds to 0.90, not to the printed 0.91.

                                            theorem BreissKatsudaKawahara2026.tableau9 :
                                            HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.7)) w9.vec Velar.oral = -1.5 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.7)) w9.vec Velar.nasal = -0.5 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.3)) w9.vec Velar.oral = -0.7 ∧ HarmonicGrammar.harmony (violations (existing 0.5 0.3)) w9.vec Velar.nasal = -0.5 ∧ pNasal w9 (existing 0.5 0.7) = Real.sigmoid 1 ∧ pNasal w9 (existing 0.5 0.3) = Real.sigmoid 0.2 ∧ 2⁻¹ < pNasal w9 (existing 0.5 0.3) ∧ pNasal w9 (existing 0.5 0.3) < pNasal w9 (existing 0.5 0.7)

                                            Tableau (9) weakens markedness and strengthens faithfulness to the compound. The nasal candidate is still the majority outcome for either compound of (8), and the compound effect keeps its sign.