Reciprocals are definites #
Formalization of [Bec01] (NLS 9). Each other uniformly denotes "the other ones among them" — an anaphoric plural definite recasting [HLM91] — and a reciprocal sentence is a special kind of relational plural. The paper admits exactly four semantic readings — collective, Strong Reciprocity, Weak Reciprocity, and situation-based WR — tracking the readings of relational plurals. The other interpretations of the [DKK+98] survey are not semantic: Partitioned SR and One-way WR are cover effects ([Sch96c] subgroups and exceptions), Intermediate Reciprocity is situation-based WR under a subsituation context (§5), and Inclusive Alternative Ordering is left underived, a lexical process limited to spatio-temporal relations (§6.3).
Main definitions #
otherOnesAmongThem— the HLM definite ((76)), in its singularity-parts case.CollectiveReading— predication of the reciprocal group itself ((84)).SituationWeakReciprocity— WR with cumulation over the situation argument ((193), bivalent, singleton covers).
Main results #
strongReciprocity_iff_otherOnes,collectiveReading_iff_strong— SR is double distribution over the definite ((81)); with a distributive relation the collective schema collapses into SR.situationWR_imp_weakReciprocity— under persistence, situation-based WR entails WR: the right edge of the entailment chain SR → sitWR → WR feeding the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis ((219), fn. 15).
The six-scheme entailment lattice ((28)) and the WR-as-cumulation identity ((120),
weakReciprocity_iff_liftRel) live in Plurality/Reciprocal.lean and are
consumed here. The convergence with [HD20] on presuppositional
distinctness is housed in Studies/HaugDalrymple2020.lean (the later paper draws the
comparison); the trivalent divergence from [Ste98] is noted at
SituationWeakReciprocity.
References #
- [Bec01] — the paper; [HLM91] — the recast analysis.
- [DKK+98] — the reading survey and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis; [Lan78] — reciprocity as relational-plural predication; [FL73] — Partitioned SR; [Kan87] — IAO.
- [Lin83], [Sch96c], [Sha80], [BS00] — the
plural-predication substrate:
*, covers, maximality,**. - [Ste98] — the WR-by-cumulation analysis §4 builds on and improves.
The HLM definite #
The reciprocal's denotation ((76)): "the other ones among them" — the maximal
subgroup of the antecedent A not overlapping the contrast argument x. In the
singularity-parts case (distinctness = non-identity, p. 92) this is A.erase x;
the full (76) routes through Sharvy maximality and Link *, with non-overlap
replacing non-identity when covers contain genuine subgroups ((78)).
Equations
- Beck2001.otherOnesAmongThem A x = A.erase x
Instances For
The definite excludes the contrast argument.
The definite is a subgroup of the antecedent.
On a plural antecedent the definite is defined (nonempty) at every member — the plurality presupposition ((115), §4.3.1).
The semantic readings, read off the definite #
On a plural antecedent, SR is double distribution over the definite ((81)): distribute over the antecedent, then over "the other ones among them".
The collective reading ((84)): the relation holds of each member and the reciprocal group itself, with no distribution over that group — "the forks are propped against each other".
Equations
- Beck2001.CollectiveReading R A = ∀ x ∈ A, R x (Beck2001.otherOnesAmongThem A x)
Instances For
On a plural antecedent and with a relation that distributes to members, the collective schema is exactly SR: (81) and (84) differ only in distribution over the definite.
Situation-based Weak Reciprocity #
(120)'s bivalent collapse — WR is ** of the strict-distinct relation — is the
substrate theorem weakReciprocity_iff_liftRel, shared with
[Ste98]'s (26b); the two analyses differ only trivalently, where
[Ste98] asserts distinctness and [Bec01] presupposes it ((113), the
distinct-subgroups effect of §4.3.2). What remains of the paper's own reading
inventory is the situation layer.
Situation-based WR ((193), bivalent, singleton covers): every relevant subsituation contains a distinct pair in the relation, and every member participates in some relevant subsituation, in each direction.
Equations
- Beck2001.SituationWeakReciprocity R A subs = ((∀ s ∈ subs, ∃ x ∈ A, ∃ y ∈ A, x ≠ y ∧ R x y s) ∧ (∀ x ∈ A, ∃ s ∈ subs, ∃ y ∈ A, x ≠ y ∧ R x y s) ∧ ∀ y ∈ A, ∃ s ∈ subs, ∃ x ∈ A, x ≠ y ∧ R x y s)
Instances For
Under persistence — what holds in a subsituation holds in the evaluation situation — situation-based WR entails WR at the evaluation situation: the right edge of the entailment chain SR → sitWR → WR that feeds the paper's Strongest Meaning Hypothesis ((219), fn. 15).