Bale and Schwarz (2022): Measurements from "per" without complex dimensions #
On Coppock's division theory the preposition per divides quantities, so that 0.9 grams per
milliliter denotes the density 0.9 g/mL. On Bale and Schwarz's anaphoric theory per
milliliter measures a covert pronoun in milliliters, a pure number that multiplies 0.9 g, and
the measure phrase stays in the dimension of mass. The division theory undergenerates: weigh
measures weight, so it cannot take a quotient, and the polysemous weigh that would let it
predicts a same-density reading of this cube weighs what that cube weighs that the sentence
lacks. It also overgenerates: it gives 0.1 grams per milliliter and 0.1 kilograms per liter
one meaning, while the anaphoric per, which sees the pronoun's referent, presupposes that the
referent measures at least one unit. Where both theories compose they agree.
A world assigns each base dimension a real-valued measure function, and the units are the English measure terms.
Main statements #
not_much_divisionMP: a measurement verb never takes a measure phrase of the division theory, whatever its units.density_reading: the polysemous weigh makes this cube weighs what that cube weighs true of a one-kilogram and a two-kilogram cube.anaphoricMP_snd: an anaphoric measure phrase has the dimension of its head unit.much_divisionMP_iff_anaphoricMP,contains_divisionMP_iff_anaphoricMP: where both theories compose, they derive the same truth conditions.divisionMP_kilogram_liter: the division theory identifies 0.1 kilograms per liter with 0.1 grams per milliliter.unit_sensitivity: on the anaphoric theory the two pseudo-partitives assert the same thing, but one presupposes a volume of at least a milliliter and the other of at least a liter.division_overgenerates: at a world where the sample measures a tenth of a milliliter, the division theory makes the 0.1 milliliter sample contained 0.1 grams of salt per milliliter true, while on the anaphoric theory it is undefined.acceptable_iff_mem_dom: a per-sentence is defined at a world where its subject measures as the example states exactly when the example is felicitous.density_ne_anaphoricMP: the anaphoric theory makes the sample's density is 0.9 grams per milliliter contradictory, the puzzle the paper ends on.
Implementation notes #
- A sentence with per denotes a partial proposition
World E →. Prop, after the Heim–Kratzer notation of (43). It maps its truth conditions over the value of the per-phrase, so the sentence is defined where per is: the global projection the paper assumes (p. 557). - The covert pronoun is a parameter, resolved to the matrix subject.
- (43) compares two quantities of one dimension; the file compares their magnitudes.
References #
A world assigns each base dimension D its measure function μ_D.
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.World E = (Degree.Dimension → E → ℝ)
Instances For
w.measure D is the measure function μ_D as a measure of dimension D.
Instances For
w.quantity D x is μ_D(x), a quantity of dimension D.
Instances For
Measure predication #
much μ q x says that x measures q under μ, λq λx. μ(x) = q. It is the measurement
verb weigh with μ = μ_WT ((5)), and the covert MUCH of pseudo-partitives with μ
underspecified ((25)).
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.much μ q x = (μ x = q)
Instances For
A measure of dimension D never equates with a quantity of another dimension.
contains salt contain μ q m says that m contains salt of measure q under μ,
∃x[salt(x) ∧ μ(x) = q ∧ contain(m, x)] ((26)).
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.contains salt contain μ q m = ∃ (x : E), salt x ∧ BaleSchwarz2022.much μ q x ∧ contain m x
Instances For
The division theory #
Coppock's per divides its second argument by its first, ⟦per⟧ = λr λq. q / r ((1)).
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.divisionPer r q = q / r
Instances For
On the division theory n u per r denotes the quotient n u / r ((2)).
Equations
Instances For
The division theory undergenerates ((7)): a measure of a base dimension never equates with a per-phrase, whose dimension is a quotient.
The polysemous weigh of (8) measures density, μ_{WT/VOL}.
Equations
Instances For
With the free relative denoting y's measure, x weighs what y weighs equates the two
measures ((12)).
The polysemous weigh gives this cube weighs what that cube weighs a same-density reading ((13)) that is true of a one-kilogram and a two-kilogram cube, where the weight reading ((12)) is false.
The anaphoric theory #
Bale and Schwarz's per measures its pronoun's referent in units of its quantity argument,
⟦per⟧ = λq λx. μ_dim(q)(x) / q ((16)), a pure number.
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.anaphoricPer w r y = w.quantity r.dimension y / r.quantity
Instances For
The anaphoric n u per r, its pronoun resolved to y, denotes n u ⋅ μ_dim(r)(y) / r
((18)).
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.anaphoricMP w n u r y = Degree.Quantity.pure n * u.quantity * BaleSchwarz2022.anaphoricPer w r y
Instances For
The anaphoric measure phrase stays in its head unit's dimension ((19)).
The measurement-verb sentence composes ((22)): μ_D(x) = n u ⋅ μ_dim(r)(y) / r.
Where both theories compose they agree: (9) and (22) with the pronoun's referent the subject, (31) and (32) with it the container.
Units of different sizes #
The division theory identifies measure phrases whose units are scaled alike ((36b)).
So it gives 0.1 kilograms per liter the meaning of 0.1 grams per milliliter, since
kg / L = g / mL ((36)).
So does the anaphoric theory.
The copular puzzle #
No quantity of mass is a density, so the sample's density is 0.9 grams ((47)) is contradictory.
On the anaphoric theory so is the sample's density is 0.9 grams per milliliter ((46)), which reports the sample's density.
On the division theory (46) equates the sample's density with n u / r.
Unit sensitivity #
The revised per of (43), λq λx: μ_dim(q)(x) ≥ q. μ_dim(q)(x) / q, is anaphoricPer
restricted to the referents that measure at least one unit.
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.per w r = PFun.res (BaleSchwarz2022.anaphoricPer w r) {y : E | ↑r.magnitude ≤ w r.dimension y}
Instances For
perSentence r y φ is a sentence whose per-phrase, its pronoun resolved to y, feeds the
truth conditions φ. At each world it maps φ over the phrase's value, so the sentence is
defined where per is.
Equations
- BaleSchwarz2022.perSentence r y φ w = Part.map (φ w) (BaleSchwarz2022.per w r y)
Instances For
A per-sentence asserts its truth conditions where it presupposes that the pronoun's referent measures at least one unit.
y weighs n u per r, the pronoun resolved to the subject ((20)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
m contains n u per r of salt, the pronoun resolved to the container ((41)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Scaling the units by k keeps a per-sentence's assertion and raises the bound its
presupposition sets from one unit to k units.
The anaphoric theory is unit sensitive ((27), (36)). The mixture contains 0.1 grams per milliliter of salt and the mixture contains 0.1 kilograms per liter of salt assert the same thing, but the first presupposes that the mixture measures at least a milliliter and the second at least a liter.
The division theory's truth conditions for m contains n u per r of salt ((31)) can hold
whatever m measures in the per-unit's dimension.
So the division theory overgenerates ((38b)): where the sample measures a tenth of a milliliter it makes the 0.1 milliliter sample contained 0.1 grams of salt per milliliter true, while on the anaphoric theory the sentence is undefined there.
The paper's examples #
An example's per-unit, and the measure in that unit's dimension that its subject is stated to have, in the dimension's reference unit.
- subjectMeasure : ℚ
Instances For
scenario? e reads the scenario off a row that states its subject's measure.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The subject measures at least one per-unit exactly in the felicitous examples ((37), (38), (44), (45)).
At a world where its subject measures as the example states, a per-sentence is defined exactly when the example is felicitous.