Documentation

Studies.Arnold2026

Arnold 2026: two kinds of singular they #

Singular they covers two uses with opposite pragmatic conditions. Underspecified they, attested since Middle English, is used when the speaker intends an underspecified representation of the referent — quantified, indefinite, epicene, or simply not developed in common ground — and its criterion is discourse specificity rather than gender, since it occurs with gendered referents too. Personal they, mainstream only since about 2018, is used because the referent's personal pronouns are they/them, a fact that must be in common ground and that tends to come with an elaborated representation. The two share their form and their lack of a gender feature, so a grammatical account of the kind Konnelly and Cowper give does not separate them: at their first stage they is unavailable for any referent of known gender, at the second it needs an ungendered lexical entry for the referent, and at the third it is unconstrained, whichever kind is intended.

Main definitions #

References #

The two kinds of singular they.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    instance Arnold2026.instDecidableEqKind :
    DecidableEq Kind
    Equations
    def Arnold2026.instReprKind.repr :
    Kind → ℕ → Std.Format
    Equations
    Instances For
      @[instance_reducible]
      Equations
      def Arnold2026.Kind.parse? :
      String → Option Kind

      The kind a row records.

      Equations
      Instances For

        A referent as the discourse portrays it: whether its representation is elaborated, and whether its personal pronouns are known in common ground to be they/them.

        • elaborated : Bool
        • theyThem : Bool
        Instances For
          def Arnold2026.instDecidableEqRepresentation.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Representation) :
          Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The representation a row records.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The pragmatic condition of each kind: underspecified they wants a thin representation, personal they wants the referent's pronouns known.

                Equations
                Instances For
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  instance Arnold2026.instDecidableCondition (k : Kind) (r : Representation) :
                  Decidable (k.condition r)
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  theorem Arnold2026.conditions_opposed (r : Representation) (hu : Kind.underspecified.condition r) (hp : Kind.personal.condition r) :
                  r = { elaborated := false, theyThem := true }

                  No representation satisfies both conditions unless the pronouns are known of a thinly represented referent — which knowing them precludes.

                  theorem Arnold2026.rows_conditions (r : Datum) :
                  r ∈ Examples.all → r.feature? "counterexample" = none → ∀ k ∈ (r.feature? "kind" >>= Kind.parse?).toList, k.condition (Representation.ofRow r)

                  Every example meets the condition of its kind, apart from the stage-3 production the paper flags as a would-be counterexample.

                  theorem Arnold2026.rows_gendered_referents (r : Datum) :
                  r ∈ Examples.all → r.source.paperLabel = "Table 1" → r.feature? "kind" = some "underspecified" ∧ r.feature? "referentGender" = some "known"

                  Underspecified they occurs with gendered referents: every Table 1 example has a referent of known gender.

                  theorem Arnold2026.rows_personal_elaborated (r : Datum) :
                  r ∈ Examples.all → r.feature? "kind" = some "personal" → (Representation.ofRow r).elaborated = true

                  Personal they is used for elaborated representations in every example, though its criterion mentions only the pronouns.

                  On the grammatical account the two kinds do not differ: they for a referent of known gender is blocked at stage 1, needs an ungendered lexical entry at stage 2, and is free at stage 3.