Anscombe 1964: before and after #
Before and after are not converses: the Parthenon was there after St. Peter's was and St. Peter's was there after the Parthenon was are compatible, while the corresponding before claims are not (§I). p before q is p and not q, and then q; it is asymmetric and transitive once repetition — p, then not p, then p — is excluded, whereas p after q, q and then p, is neither, and p before q entails q after p but not conversely (§II). Quantifying over times renders p before q as a time of p before every time of q (§IV), which is right for before ever rather than before (§V): the two agree exactly when q does not repeat. For instantaneous events before and after are genuine converses (§VIII); otherwise a beginning or an ending is always involved (§IX–§X).
A clause's present-tense proposition holds at the times of its timeTrace, so excluding
repetition is Set.OrdConnected and an instantaneous event has a singleton trace.
References #
Definitions #
p before q holds when p and not q, and then q (§II).
Equations
- Anscombe1964.Anscombe.before A B = ∃ t ∈ Tense.timeTrace A \ Tense.timeTrace B, ∃ t' ∈ Tense.timeTrace B, t < t'
Instances For
p after q holds when q, and then p, a time of p after a time of q (§II, §IV).
Equations
- Anscombe1964.Anscombe.after A B = ∃ t ∈ Tense.timeTrace A, ∃ t' ∈ Tense.timeTrace B, t' < t
Instances For
A clause repeats when p, and then not p, and then p (§II).
Equations
- Anscombe1964.Repetition A = ∃ t₁ ∈ Tense.timeTrace A, ∃ t₂ ∉ Tense.timeTrace A, ∃ t₃ ∈ Tense.timeTrace A, t₁ < t₂ ∧ t₂ < t₃
Instances For
A clause reports an instantaneous event when it holds at a single time (§VIII).
Equations
- Anscombe1964.Instantaneous A = ∃ (t : T), Tense.timeTrace A = {t}
Instances For
The logical properties (§II) #
Repetition is excluded exactly when the clause holds over an order-connected set.
Before is asymmetric when repetition is excluded.
Before is transitive when repetition is excluded.
With repetition admitted, before is not asymmetric, as in it was night before it was day, and day before it was night.
p before q entails q after p.
After is not asymmetric, as the overlapping existences of the Parthenon and St. Peter's show.
The Parthenon was there after the Parthenon was there might pass and I was born after I was born does not, since a clause is after itself iff it holds at two times.
After is not transitive, as in I was born after the Parthenon was there; the Parthenon was there after I was born; ergo, I was born after I was born.
Quantification over times (§IV–§V) #
Before ever is before, provided q held at all.
For a non-repeating q, before is before ever (§V).
He studied his appearance in the glass before he used the telephone does not say he did so before he ever used it, so before does not entail before ever.
When q has a first time, p before ever q holds iff a time of p precedes it.
Instantaneous events (§VI–§VIII) #
When p reports an instantaneous event, p after q is q before p (§X, case 2).
An instantaneous p is not both before and after a non-repeating q (§X, case 1).
A stretch can be both before and after an instantaneous event (§X, case 1).
Beginnings and endings (§IX–§X) #
p before q implies that q began.
For a non-repeating q with a first time, p before q is p before q began.
p after q is p after q began (§III (3), §X case 3a); q before p gives it too
(after_of_before, case 3b).
p after q stopped gives p after q (§III (4) to (3), §X case 3c).