Docs / Studies / Studies.AnandToosarvandani2019

Now and then: Perspectives on positional variance in temporal demonstratives

Anand, P. & Toosarvandani, M. (2019). In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23 (pp. 19–36)

now and then are temporal demonstratives indexical to an assessment time a rather than to the utterance time u: now refers to a time within a, then to a time disjoint from it, (12). A demonstrative restricts the reference of its sentence's tense through a silent IN, (13). now needs R-PAST, whose reference lies within an assessment time before the utterance, (17); then needs PAST, whose reference precedes the assessment time, (15). The assessment time is the utterance time or starts with the most recent eventuality, CATS (31). In initial position a demonstrative is a contrastive topic whose alternatives are disjoint, (28), so it cannot overlap a preceding sentence that answers a sister subquestion; with CATS, a now sentence cannot precede the preceding sentence. These give the positional generalization (45).

Implementation notes

The contexts enter only through their times; τ₀ is the time of the preceding sentence, the top of the eventuality stack, and the account is evaluated on ℤ. The examples record the strategy of inquiry: whether the preceding sentence answers a sister subquestion, and whether an earlier time is retrievable. A final demonstrative is anaphoric to τ₀. The clash of an overlapping state in (7) and (36b) is the aspectual constraint of Partee's (6), outside the account.

References

Tenses and demonstratives (section 3)

L45–51

The assessment time (section 4.2)

L91–95

No going backwards (29): under CATS a reference within an assessment time that precedes the utterance time cannot precede the time of the most recent eventuality.

theorem not_precedes_of_catsL97–104
{T : Type u_1} [LinearOrder T] {a u τ₀ r : NonemptyInterval T} (h : Cats a u τ₀) (hr : r ≤ a) (hau : a.Precedes u) :
¬r.Precedes τ₀

Built from

Position (sections 4 and 6)

L123–128
L130–134
L136–142
L144–151
L157–159
L161–163
L165–167

The account derives the positional generalization (45).

theorem admits_iffL266–286
{d : Demonstrative} {p : Position} {sister anterior : Bool} {o : Ordering} :
Admits d p sister anterior o ↔ Predicted d sister anterior p o

Built from , , ,

The examples

L290–292

A reading of an example is accepted exactly when the account admits it and, for an overlapping reading, the aspect of the sentences allows overlap, as in Partee's (6).

theorem accepted_iff_admitsL300–309
(row : Datum) :
row ∈ Examples.all → ∀ d ∈ row.parse? "demonstrative" [("now", Demonstrative.now), ("then", Demonstrative.then)], ∀ p ∈ row.parse? "position" [("initial", Position.initial), ("final", Position.final)], ∀ reading ∈ row.readings, ∀ o ∈ List.lookup reading.1 readingRelation, reading.2 = Judgment.acceptable ↔ Admits d p (sisterOf row) (anteriorOf row) o ∧ ¬(row.feature? "aspect" = some "state cannot overlap" ∧ o = Ordering.eq)

Built from , , ,