Alonso-Ovalle & Menéndez-Benito (2010): modal indefinites #
Spanish algún conveys that at least two individuals in its domain are possibilities — the
Modal Variation component (18), ModalVariation — where German irgendein
conveys the stronger Free Choice component (13c), FreeChoice: in the
hide-and-seek scenario (15) Pedro can use algún with the bathroom ruled out
(hideAndSeek), and under uniqueness Free Choice entails Modal Variation but not
conversely (modalVariation_of_freeChoice). The component is a conversational
implicature: as a presupposition it would make the negated (36) contradictory
(not_modalVariation_of_box_empty), and it is cancellable (42), absent under
downward entailing operators (43)–(44), and reinforceable (45d).
The paper derives it from an anti-singleton constraint (53)–(54) on the subset selection
function algún takes (algún), which excludes the singleton restrictors of (47)/(49)
(algún_ne_one_of_singleton). The competitors (58) are the singleton subdomains; their
falsity under a necessity modal (59) gives Modal Variation (modalVariation_of_box),
and under a possibility modal, where some competitor must be true
(exists_singleton_of_diamond), the anti-exhaustivity implicatures (67)–(68) do
(modalVariation_of_singletons). A domain widener competes with every proper
subdomain (70), and the same reasoning yields Free Choice (freeChoice_of_proper).
Without uniqueness the blocked exhaustivity inference (76) and the plural competitor (77)
give ignorance of number (numberIgnorance_of_competition), which uniqueness makes
unavailable (not_numberIgnorance_of_uniqueness) — the two parameters of Table 1. The
scenario verdicts (24)–(30) are checked in rows_agree.
References #
Subset selection functions (§4.1) #
A singleton subset selection function (52).
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.IsSingleton f = ∀ (P : Finset E), (f P).card = 1
Instances For
An anti-singleton subset selection function (53).
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.IsAntiSingleton f = ∀ (P : Finset E), (f P).card ≠ 1
Instances For
un (50) quantifies existentially over the subdomain that f selects from P.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.un f P Q w = SignType.ofProp (∃ x ∈ f P, Q w x)
Instances For
algún (54) is un, defined only for an anti-singleton f.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.algún f P Q = {_w : W | AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.IsAntiSingleton f}.indicator (AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.un f P Q)
Instances For
On a singleton restrictor (46)–(49) an anti-singleton selection returns no domain, so algún's claim cannot be true where un's can.
Non-uniqueness (§5) #
Ignorance with respect to number holds when the number of witnesses varies across the accessible worlds.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
With the exhaustivity inference of a singleton domain blocked and the plural competitor (77) unassertable, a true claim conveys ignorance of number ((76)–(78)).
Under uniqueness a true claim fixes the number of witnesses at one in every accessible world, so ignorance of number conflicts with the common ground.
The scenarios #
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.instDecidableEqRoom x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Worlds are Juan's hiding places.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.inRoom w r = (w = r)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Pedro's epistemic alternatives, the rooms he takes to be possible from any world.
Equations
Instances For
Pedro rules out the bathroom and the kitchen (15).
Equations
Instances For
Pedro considers only the bathroom (23).
Instances For
Pedro considers the other rooms or the barn (27).
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.instDecidableEqCandidate x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.hires w c = (w = c)
Instances For
The permitted hires, from any world.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
In (15) Modal Variation holds without Free Choice; the singleton competitors are all false (59b) and carry their anti-exhaustivity implicatures (68b), while the widening competitor bedroom or living room (72) does not.
The paper's verdicts #
A row's predicted verdict, where algún needs Modal Variation, cualquiera Free Choice, and un nothing.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.predicted.verdictIn R D Q "algún" = some (decide (∀ (w : W), Exhaustification.ModalVariation R w D Q))
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.predicted.verdictIn R D Q "cualquiera" = some (decide (∀ (w : W), Exhaustification.FreeChoice R w D Q))
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.predicted.verdictIn R D Q "un" = some true
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.predicted.verdictIn R D Q a✝ = none
Instances For
A row's observed verdict, which is fine unless the row is deviant or judged false.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalleMenendezBenito2010.observed row = (row.judgment == Judgment.acceptable && row.feature? "verdict" != some "false")
Instances For
Every row in a modelled scenario carries the predicted verdict.