Alonso-Ovalle (2009): counterfactuals, correlatives, and disjunction #
A would-counterfactual with a disjunctive antecedent is read as checking the consequent in
the closest worlds of each disjunct, which a minimal-change semantics with Boolean or
cannot do: on the bumper-crop scenario (1) it hands the modal the union and predicts the
counterfactual true (bumperCrop_boolean). The paper keeps minimal change and instead lets
or introduce its disjuncts as Hamblin alternatives (10) and treats conditionals as
correlatives: the if-clause universally quantifies over the alternatives (25) and the
consequent, abstracted over the propositional anaphor then, supplies the modal (24). The
composition is distributiveImp for would and DistributiveMight for might; it validates
Simplification (27), makes (1) false (bumperCrop_alternatives), and leaves the negated (29)
true when one simplification holds, where a sum with the homogeneity presupposition (33)
gives a gap (hitler_negation, homogeneity_ne_false).
Rival derivations fail. A strict conditional makes Simplification a monotonicity inference
(strict_simplification) but not for the dual might (strictMight_not_simplifying), and
Stalnaker's ◇(would) recovers it (stalnaker_might_simplification) only for epistemic
modals. On von Fintel's modal horizon (44)–(45), Simplification is Strawson-valid like
Strengthening the Antecedent (horizonWould_anti) but not dynamically valid
(horizon_sunCold_undefined). The manner implicature (75)–(76) does not deliver both
simplifications (manner_insufficient). Nute's (80) is a contradiction unless a disjunct is
impossible (distributive_pair_disjoint_iff) and needs Existential Closure (82) (budget).
The paper's verdicts are checked in rows_agree.
References #
Conditionals as correlatives (§2) #
Might in the consequent (70)–(71) under the universal if-clause (25) holds when the closest worlds of every alternative are compatible with the consequent.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.DistributiveMight ord S C w = ∀ A ∈ S, w ∈ Conditional.might (Conditional.closestImp ord) (↑A) C
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Simplification (27) says that the disjunctive counterfactual entails each disjunct's.
Simplification for might (54), the extension of §3.3.
The good-weather and cold-sun worlds of the bumper-crop model.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Boolean or (6) hands the modal the union, and (1) comes out true (Fig. 1).
With the disjuncts as alternatives (13) under universal force (26), (1) is false, since the closest cold-sun worlds have no crop.
Universal quantifier or sum (§2.2.3) #
A sum analysis falsifies a disjunctive counterfactual only when every disjunct's counterfactual fails.
In (29)–(31) Spain joining Germany is closer than Spain joining the U.S., and Hitler is pleased only in the former.
- actual : HitlerWorld
- germany : HitlerWorld
- us : HitlerWorld
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.instDecidableEqHitlerWorld x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.hitlerSim x✝ = Preorder.lift AlonsoOvalle2009.HitlerWorld.rank
Instances For
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Instances For
Under the universal quantifier (29) is true, with (30a) true and (30b) false as (31) continues; under a sum with homogeneity (33) it is a gap.
Downward entailingness (§3) #
A strict conditional is antitone in its antecedent, so Simplification is a monotonicity inference, (37)–(38).
Stalnaker's might counterfactual, epistemic possibility over E of the strict would,
inherits Simplification, (60)–(64).
Accommodation (44) grows the modal horizon f by every world at least as close as the
closest antecedent worlds.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.expand ord f φ w = f w ∪ {w' : W | ∀ w'' ∈ φ, w' ≤ w''}
Instances For
The counterfactual on a horizon (45) holds when every antecedent world in the horizon is a consequent world.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.horizonWould f φ ψ w = ∀ w' ∈ f w ∩ φ, w' ∈ ψ
Instances For
The presupposition of (45) is that the horizon reaches the antecedent.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.HorizonReaches f φ w = (f w ∩ φ).Nonempty
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.instDecidableHorizonReaches w f φ = { decide := decide (∃ a ∈ f w ∩ φ, true = true), reflects_decide := ⋯ }
Strengthening the Antecedent and Simplification alike are Strawson valid (50), since on a horizon that already reaches the stronger antecedent, (45) is antitone in it.
Simplification is dynamically invalid (47), since accommodating (48)'s antecedent from the initial horizon reaches the good-weather world only, so (49b) is undefined.
Might counterfactuals (§3.2) #
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.instDecidableEqForkWorld x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.forkSim x✝ = Preorder.lift AlonsoOvalle2009.ForkWorld.rank
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Under (52)–(53) the closest worlds of the union are magic-book worlds, one of which bends the fork, so (51) is true; under the correlative analysis it is false, since (58a) is true but (58b) is not.
An implicature? (§4) #
Figures 3–4 have two worlds compatible with the speaker's beliefs; magic-book and newborn worlds are equally close to each, and the fork is bent in a closest magic-book world of the first and in a closest newborn world of the second.
- w₃ : BeliefWorld
- book₃ : BeliefWorld
- baby₃ : BeliefWorld
- w₄ : BeliefWorld
- book₄ : BeliefWorld
- baby₄ : BeliefWorld
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.instDecidableEqBeliefWorld x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₃.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₃ = 0
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₄.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₄ = 0
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₃.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.book₃ = 1
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₃.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.baby₃ = 1
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₄.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.book₄ = 1
- AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.w₄.rank AlonsoOvalle2009.BeliefWorld.baby₄ = 1
- x✝¹.rank x✝ = 2
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Manner (75)–(76) is satisfied — (73) holds throughout the belief state and neither (74a) nor (74b) does — yet the two simplifications hold together nowhere in it, so (77) is not predicted deviant.
The visibility of the disjuncts (§5.2) #
On Nute's recipe (80), when the consequent is one of two incompatible disjuncts, the analysis makes the counterfactual true only if the other disjunct is impossible.
In (80) more defense spending is closer than more education spending.
- actual : BudgetWorld
- defense : BudgetWorld
- education : BudgetWorld
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.instDecidableEqBudgetWorld x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.budgetSim x✝ = Preorder.lift AlonsoOvalle2009.BudgetWorld.rank
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
(80) is a contradiction under the analysis and true once Existential Closure (82) returns the Boolean antecedent.
The paper's verdicts #
The alternatives a row's antecedent feature names in each model.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.cropAlts "good weather" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.goodWeatherW}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.cropAlts "sun cold" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.sunColdW}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.cropAlts "good weather or sun cold" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.goodWeatherW, AlonsoOvalle2009.sunColdW}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.cropAlts x✝ = none
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.hitlerAlts "joined Germany" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.joinedGermany}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.hitlerAlts "joined the U.S." = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.joinedUS}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.hitlerAlts "joined Germany or the U.S." = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.joinedGermany, AlonsoOvalle2009.joinedUS}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.hitlerAlts x✝ = none
Instances For
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.forkAlts "magic book" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.hasBook}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.forkAlts "newborn baby" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.newborn}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.forkAlts "magic book or newborn baby" = some {AlonsoOvalle2009.hasBook, AlonsoOvalle2009.newborn}
- AlonsoOvalle2009.forkAlts x✝ = none
Instances For
The verdict of the analysis for a would or might consequent, possibly negated.
Equations
- AlonsoOvalle2009.verdict ord S C w "would" x✝ = some (decide (w ∈ Conditional.distributiveImp ord S C) != x✝)
- AlonsoOvalle2009.verdict ord S C w "might" x✝ = some (decide (AlonsoOvalle2009.DistributiveMight ord S C w) != x✝)
- AlonsoOvalle2009.verdict ord S C w x✝¹ x✝ = none
Instances For
A row's predicted verdict from its scenario, antecedent, modal, and polarity
features; (80) takes the Existential Closure reading (82).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every row with a stated verdict that the models cover carries the predicted one.