Ackerman and Malouf (2013): Morphological Organization: The Low Conditional Entropy Conjecture #
Ackerman and Malouf separate the enumerative complexity of an inflectional system — how many
cells, realizations, and inflection classes it has — from its integrative complexity, the
average conditional entropy of one paradigm cell given another
(Morphology.ParadigmSystem.avgCondEntropy), and conjecture that the latter stays low however
large the former grows. Their Modern Greek nominal fragment carries the argument: its eight
declensions violate paradigm economy and fill a tiny corner of the space its per-cell
realizations allow, while implicative structure keeps the speaker's task small, and the paper's
two worked conditional entropies come out as exact closed forms. Burmeso's vocabularly clear
object agreement sits at the zero of the measure, and Chiquihuitlán Mazatec's final-vowel and
tone classes sit far from it, the prose claim that only third-person vowels are diagnostic
sharpened to what its Table 6 supports.
Main statements #
greek_not_paradigmEconomy,greek_principalParts: Greek violates the enumerative principles while keeping a small principal-part set.greek_genSg_given_accPl_a,greek_genSg_given_accPl: the paper's worked conditional entropies (13) and (14) as exact closed forms,log 3 − (2/3) log 2and(3/8) log 3nats.burmeso_avgCondEntropy: vocabular clarity makes Burmeso's average conditional entropy zero.mazatec_vowels_diagnosticity,mazatec_tones_no_diagnostic_cell: how far the Mazatec final vowels and tones are from clarity.
Implementation notes #
- Class probabilities are
uniformOn Set.univ, the paper's (5), under which every printed number is computed; entropies are in nats, the paper's bits are these divided bylog 2. avgCondEntropyaverages over ordered pairs of distinct cells, which reproduces Table 2's expected values and its grand average; the running text prints a different rounding of the latter.- Table 1 yields five rival genitive singulars and a realization-space of 25600 class candidates where pp. 445–446 count six and 46,080 on richer data than Table 1.
TODO #
greek_avgCondEntropy: the closed form of Table 2's grand average, provable fromcondEntropy_uniformOn_univwith a per-pair count table.- Table 5's average entropies and the tone system's realization count are computed on the appendix's full Table A6 data and do not follow from Tables 6–7, so they are not stated.
References #
Instances for the fragments' form types #
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Modern Greek: enumerative complexity #
Eight declensions exceed the five rival realizations of the most varied cell.
Table 3's Greek row counts twelve realizations over the eight cells.
Eight classes against the 25600 the per-cell realizations of Table 1 would allow ("it has fewer inflection classes than it could").
Modern Greek: implicative structure #
The accusative plural does not predict the genitive singular; after -a two genitives remain.
An accusative plural in -i fixes the genitive singular in -us.
Nominative singular, genitive singular, and accusative plural are principal parts; the last two alone are not.
Modern Greek: entropy #
The declension entropy of the eight classes is log 8 nats, the paper's 3 bits.
The genitive plural has a single realization and no entropy.
Because the accusative plural predicts the nominative plural, the latter's conditional entropy given it vanishes.
In the paper's (13), an accusative plural in -a leaves the genitive singular split two
to one, carrying log 3 − (2/3) log 2 nats = 0.918 bits.
In the paper's (14), the genitive singular given the accusative plural carries
(3/8) log 3 nats = 0.594 bits.
Table 2's grand average, the average conditional entropy of the Greek paradigms, equals this closed form, 0.664 bits.
Burmeso #
Every cell identifies the class.
Table 3's Burmeso row counts six realizations, at most two per cell.
Being vocabularly clear, Burmeso has average conditional entropy zero.
Chiquihuitlán Mazatec #
The first and second person plural vowels are constant across classes.
Over Table 6, "only the third-person forms are in any way diagnostic" comes to this much. The third person predicts the second singular yet is no principal part, while the first singular predicts the first inclusive.
No cell of the tone patterns is diagnostic of class membership.