Degree Movement #
@cite{bhatt-pancheva-2004} @cite{heim-2000} @cite{williams-1974}
The interpretation of degree clauses requires them to take scope at LF. Their syntactic placement is constrained by late merger (@cite{bhatt-pancheva-2004}); their semantic scope is constrained by the Heim-Kennedy Constraint (@cite{heim-2000}). Both constraints relate the LF position of a DegP to the LF position of any quantificational DP whose trace appears inside it.
Specializes lateMergerBleeds for degree clauses, formalizes the
Heim-Kennedy Constraint as a structural filter, derives the Williams
correlation as a corollary, and adds the @cite{bhatt-takahashi-2011}
§4 (43) base-position generalization.
Heim-Kennedy Constraint (@cite{heim-2000}) #
If the scope of a quantificational DP contains the trace of a DegP, it also contains that DegP itself.
Mechanically: any LF in which a QP scopes between a DegP and the DegP's trace is illicit. Equivalently, a binding dependency QP → DegP-trace forces the DegP to scope at or above the QP.
Williams 1974 generalization (@cite{williams-1974}; B&P §5.2) #
DegPs cannot escape an intensional verb whose subject's trace is in the DegP's restrictor.
This is the contrapositive of HKC: the only way for a DegP to scope above the intensional verb is if no binding dependency forces it down. B&P §5.2 derives this from HKC + the assumption that intensional subjects bind into degree predicates.
A position on a movement chain that could host a degree clause.
height is structural position; scopeOK records whether merging
the degree clause at this position would yield a Heim-Kennedy-
compliant LF (i.e., DegP-scope is at or above any QP whose trace
it contains).
- height : ℕ
- scopeOK : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
The B&P specialization of lateMergerBleeds for degree clauses:
the degree clause can late-merge above a Condition-C-relevant
binder iff there is a scope-licit chain position above the
binder.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A scope-licit position above the binder bleeds Condition C for
degree-clause late merger. Specialization of
admissible_above_binder_bleeds.
If no chain position is scope-licit, the degree clause is forced to
reconstruct. Specialization of no_admissible_no_bleed.
A scope binding records the LF heights of a DegP and a QP, plus
whether the QP's trace appears inside the DegP's restrictor.
qpBasePosition records the QP's base (theta) position separately
from its surface-scope position qpHeight; this is needed for
@cite{bhatt-takahashi-2011} §4 (43), which states the than-phrase-
internal scope generalization in terms of the QP's base position
relative to the degree trace, not its surface-scope position. For
B&P 2004 / Heim 2001 usages where the distinction is irrelevant,
set qpBasePosition := qpHeight.
- degHeight : ℕ
LF height at which the DegP takes scope.
- qpHeight : ℕ
LF height at which the QP takes scope.
- qpBasePosition : ℕ
- qpBindsDeg : Bool
Whether the QP binds into the DegP's restrictor (i.e., the DegP contains a trace of the QP).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Heim-Kennedy Constraint (@cite{heim-2000}; B&P §4.1): a scope binding is licit iff either (a) there is no binding dependency from the QP into the DegP, OR (b) the DegP scopes at or above the QP.
Equations
- Minimalist.DegreeMovement.IsHeimKennedy b = (¬b.qpBindsDeg = true ∨ b.degHeight ≥ b.qpHeight)
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalist.DegreeMovement.instDecidableIsHeimKennedy b = id inferInstance
Without a binding dependency, HKC imposes no scope constraint.
qpBasePosition defaults to qpH (irrelevant to HKC).
With a binding dependency, HKC requires the DegP to scope at or above the binding QP.
HKC's characteristic prohibition: a QP scoping strictly above a DegP it binds into is illicit.
Williams 1974 (@cite{williams-1974}; B&P §5.2 (37)): a DegP cannot take inverse scope over an intensional verb whose subject's trace is in the DegP's restrictor.
Stated as a contrapositive of HKC: if the QP (intensional subject) binds into the DegP and scopes strictly above it, the LF is illicit. The Williams generalization is therefore not a primitive constraint but a consequence of HKC + the assumption that intensional subjects bind into the degree predicate.
Conversely: when the intensional subject doesn't bind into the DegP, Williams's prohibition is lifted — the DegP is free to take wide scope. This is B&P's diagnosis of why the Williams generalization shows exceptions.
@cite{bhatt-takahashi-2011} §4 (43): English allows than-phrase-
internal scope for QPs whose base position does not c-command
the degree trace. Stated as a structural filter on ScopeBinding,
IsBhattTakahashiScopeLicit returns True when the QP's base
position is at or below the DegP's height (no c-command of the
degree trace from the base) — in which case than-internal scope
is licensed.
Note this is distinct from HKC: HKC is over the QP's surface scope position relative to the DegP; B&T (43) is over the QP's base position. The two coincide for in-situ QPs (where surface = base) and diverge for QPs that have moved.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalist.DegreeMovement.instDecidableIsBhattTakahashiScopeLicit b = id inferInstance
The structural witness of B&T (43): a QP whose base position is strictly above the DegP cannot license than-internal scope.
A QP whose base position is at or below the DegP licenses than-internal scope under B&T (43).