Modal Base Temporal Constraints #
@cite{klecha-2016}
Klecha-namespace dispatch on ModalBaseKind for the temporal constraints
that fall out of @cite{klecha-2016}'s modal-base-pronoun architecture, plus
bridges from Attitude / ModalFlavor to ModalBaseKind.
The framework-neutral interval predicates (isActualHistory,
isFutureHistory, etc.) and the situation-base derivation theorems live
in Core.Modality.HistoricalAlternatives. This file's role is the
Klecha-specific projection: dispatch on ModalBaseKind to select between
the actual-history (RT ≤ EvalT) and future-history (RT > EvalT)
constraints.
Klecha's key insight: the temporal orientation of a modal is determined by the temporal structure of its accessible histories, which is encoded in the modal base pronoun:
- DOX (doxastic): returns actual histories ending at the eval time. → RT ≤ EvalT (Upper Limit Constraint).
- CIR (circumstantial): returns future histories departing from the eval time. → RT > EvalT (future orientation).
The ULC is derived by .2 projection from actualHistoryBase
membership (see actualHistoryBase_derives_ulc in
Core.Modality.HistoricalAlternatives); the dispatch theorem
attitudeTemporalConstraint_derived_doxastic below makes the
Klecha-namespace face of that derivation kernel-checked.
Temporal Constraints on Embedded RT #
Doxastic temporal constraint: embedded reference time must be an actual time relative to the modal's evaluation time (RT ≤ EvalT).
This is the compositional source of the Upper Limit Constraint. @cite{klecha-2016} derives it from DOX's temporal character: since DOX returns actual histories (ending at t), the embedded event must be located within that interval.
Equations
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.doxConstrainsRT evalTime refTime = Core.Modality.HistoricalAlternatives.isActualHistory evalTime refTime
Instances For
Circumstantial temporal constraint: embedded reference time must be a future time relative to the modal's evaluation time (RT > EvalT).
This is what permits future-oriented readings under hope, pray, and circumstantial/teleological/deontic modals. @cite{klecha-2016} derives it from CIR's temporal character: since CIR returns future histories (departing from t), the embedded event must be located after that time.
Equations
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.cirConstrainsRT evalTime refTime = Core.Modality.HistoricalAlternatives.isFutureHistory evalTime refTime
Instances For
The doxastic constraint IS the upper limit: RT ≤ EvalT.
The circumstantial constraint permits future reference: RT > EvalT.
Attitude verbs compatible with DOX impose an upper limit; those compatible with CIR do not. This is Klecha's central result: the temporal constraint varies with the modal base, not the attitude verb per se.
think → DOX only → upper limit
hope → CIR (or DOX) → no upper limit with CIR
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.attitudeTemporalConstraint Core.Modality.ModalBaseKind.doxastic evalTime refTime = Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.doxConstrainsRT evalTime refTime
Instances For
Under DOX, past tense is compatible (RT < EvalT → RT ≤ EvalT).
Under DOX, future tense is incompatible (RT > EvalT → ¬ RT ≤ EvalT).
Under CIR, future tense is compatible (RT > EvalT).
Klecha 2016: constraint as derivation, not stipulation #
The two theorems below make @cite{klecha-2016}'s central architectural
claim kernel-checked: attitudeTemporalConstraint is derived from
membership in the corresponding situation-base (actualHistoryBase for
DOX, futureHistoryBase for CIR), not stipulated.
This is the formal contrast with @cite{abusch-1997}'s ULC, which is
stipulated as a presupposition on T-nodes; here, ULC follows by .2
projection through the situation-base definition. The substrate
derivation lives in Core.Modality.HistoricalAlternatives as
actualHistoryBase_time_actual / futureHistoryBase_time_future;
these theorems re-express it in the Klecha-namespace
attitudeTemporalConstraint form.
@cite{klecha-2016} eq (35a): DOX returns the actual history base.
Membership in actualHistoryBase derives the doxastic temporal
constraint (Upper Limit Constraint) by .2 projection.
@cite{klecha-2016} eq (35b): CIR returns the future history base.
Membership in futureHistoryBase derives the circumstantial
temporal constraint (future orientation) by .2 projection.
Attitude → ModalBaseKind bridge #
Derive ModalBaseKind from Attitude classification.
@cite{klecha-2016}: doxastic attitudes select DOX, preferential attitudes
select CIR. The derived kind determines temporal orientation.
Note: preferential attitudes CAN also take DOX (e.g., "I hope she already left" = DOX → past reading). This function returns the kind that distinguishes them: the kind that PERMITS future orientation.
Equations
Instances For
Doxastic attitudes select DOX.
Preferential attitudes select CIR (= can access future histories).
PermitsCircumstantial ↔ toModalBaseKind = .circumstantial.
ModalFlavor → ModalBaseKind bridge #
@cite{klecha-2016} Table 1: the temporal orientation of a modal correlates
with its flavor. Epistemic modals are past/present-oriented (DOX-like);
circumstantial, deontic, bouletic, and teleological modals are
future-oriented (CIR-like). This function bridges the four-way
ModalFlavor classification (from Core.Modality) to Klecha's binary
ModalBaseKind.
Map modal flavor to modal base kind. Epistemic → DOX (past/present orientation). Circumstantial, deontic, bouletic → CIR (future orientation).
Equations
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.ModalFlavor.toModalBaseKind Core.Modality.ModalFlavor.epistemic = Core.Modality.ModalBaseKind.doxastic
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.ModalFlavor.toModalBaseKind Core.Modality.ModalFlavor.circumstantial = Core.Modality.ModalBaseKind.circumstantial
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.ModalFlavor.toModalBaseKind Core.Modality.ModalFlavor.deontic = Core.Modality.ModalBaseKind.circumstantial
- Semantics.Modality.TemporalConstraint.ModalFlavor.toModalBaseKind Core.Modality.ModalFlavor.bouletic = Core.Modality.ModalBaseKind.circumstantial
Instances For
Epistemic modals are DOX-like.
Circumstantial modals are CIR-like.
Deontic modals are CIR-like.
Bouletic modals are CIR-like.
Table 1 consequence: epistemic modals block future orientation.
Table 1 consequence: circumstantial modals permit future orientation.
Table 1 consequence: deontic modals permit future orientation.
All non-epistemic flavors map to CIR.