Relative clauses: typological survey (WALS) #
Aggregate distribution theorems over the WALS relativization chapters.
Ch 122 (subjects): 166 languages; gap dominates, reflecting subjects'
high accessibility on the [KC77] hierarchy. Ch 123
(obliques): 112 languages; gap remains most common, but pronoun
retention is far more frequent than for subjects, and a sizeable
minority cannot relativize obliques at all. Per-language WALS values are
queried directly from the Data/WALS rows; per-language marker
inventories live in Fragments/{Lang}/Relativization.lean.
WALS Ch 122: gap is the most common subject relativization strategy, followed by non-reduction, relative pronoun, and pronoun retention.
WALS Chs 122/123: pronoun retention is more common for obliques than for subjects — a key Accessibility-Hierarchy prediction ([KC77]).
WALS Ch 123: some languages cannot relativize obliques at all, contrasting with subjects, where the Ch 122 enum has no "not possible" value.