Documentation

Linglib.Syntax.DependencyGrammar.Formal.Ellipsis

Ellipsis as catena-targeting #

[Osb19]'s central thesis: VP ellipsis, gapping, pseudogapping, sluicing, stripping, and fragment answers all elide a catena (connected in the dependency graph) that is not in general a constituent (the projection of any single node). The structural reason is that in a flat DG analysis the verb's projection always includes its subject, so even ordinary VP ellipsis already removes a non-projection set of words.

Main declarations #

Implementation notes #

Ellipsis type taxonomy #

Ellipsis types in English ([Osb19], Ch. 12–13).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations

      Worked example: gapping #

      DG tree for the pre-ellipsis second clause of "Fred eats beans and Jim eats rice": eats(0) heads Jim(1) (nsubj) and rice(2) (obj).

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Gapping elides the verb alone: {eats} = {0}.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The elided material in gapping is a catena (a singleton is trivially connected).

          The elided material in gapping is not a constituent: the verb's projection also contains its subject and object.