Tsilia & Zhao 2026: Tense and perspective #
[TZ26] solve the ⌈then⌉-present puzzle: temporal ⌈then⌉ is
incompatible with the present tense across languages, even where the present
shifts (denoting the attitude 'now' rather than utterance time) — yet
compatible in the very same language (Modern Greek) with deleted (SOT)
tense, distinguishing the shifted present from deleted tense for the first
time. Tenses and ⌈then⌉ are interpreted relative to a temporal perspective π;
the operator OP_π rebinds π clause-wide, so a shifted PRES and a clausemate
⌈then⌉ read the SAME π and their overlap/disjointness presuppositions clash —
a shift-together effect in the temporal domain, after the indexical-shift
monsters of [AN04b] and [Dea20]
(shifted_present_blocks_then). Deleted tense has no perspectival
presupposition, so ⌈then⌉ stays satisfiable
(Tense.Perspective.thenPresup_satisfiable). The [Sha03] simultaneous
reading is the case where the shifted PRES presupposition holds trivially
(Tense.simultaneousFrame_isPresent).
Cross-linguistic data #
The ⌈then⌉ inventory is Zhao2025.thenAdverbs (Greek tóte, Hebrew az,
Russian togda, Japanese tōji, English then). The tense-shift
typology (TenseShiftProfile): present-under-past shifts in attitude
reports in Greek, Hebrew and Russian, also in relative clauses in Japanese,
and never in English; present-under-future shifts everywhere, because
will = WOLL + PRES and WOLL is intensional, providing the OP_π site even in
relative clauses. The English present under future is deleted by SOT
(c-commanded by WOLL's PRES), not shifted — which is why English ⌈then⌉
tolerates present-under-future.
Shift together #
A shifted present blocks ⌈then⌉: OP_π rebinds π for the whole frame, so the shifted PRES (R = π') and a clausemate ⌈then⌉ (reference disjoint from π') read the same π' — no reference satisfies both the "during then" containment and disjointness. *Nate said Erica is angry (then).
Tense-shift typology #
A language's tense-shift profile: whether a simultaneous reading of an embedded present is available in each of the four past/future × attitude/relative configurations, and whether the language's SOT rule can delete a present.
- language : String
Language name
- pastAttitude : Bool
Present-under-past, attitude report complement
- pastRelative : Bool
Present-under-past, relative clause
- futAttitude : Bool
Present-under-future, attitude report complement
- futRelative : Bool
Present-under-future, relative clause
- sotDeletesPresent : Bool
Does the language have SOT deletion that can apply to the present? English: yes (present under future is deleted, not shifted). Modern Greek: no (the "Interpret the Present" constraint blocks deletion).
- thenPastOnly : Bool
Is ⌈then⌉ restricted to past-oriented contexts? Japanese tōji cannot co-occur with future matrix tense.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Modern Greek: shifts in attitude reports (past & future) and relative clauses under future, but NOT in relative clauses under past.
Equations
- TsiliaZhao2026.greekProfile = { language := "Modern Greek", pastAttitude := true, pastRelative := false, futAttitude := true, futRelative := true, sotDeletesPresent := false }
Instances For
Modern Hebrew: same pattern as Greek for shift; no SOT deletion of present.
Equations
- TsiliaZhao2026.hebrewProfile = { language := "Modern Hebrew", pastAttitude := true, pastRelative := false, futAttitude := true, futRelative := true, sotDeletesPresent := false }
Instances For
Russian: same pattern as Greek/Hebrew for shift.
Equations
- TsiliaZhao2026.russianProfile = { language := "Russian", pastAttitude := true, pastRelative := false, futAttitude := true, futRelative := true, sotDeletesPresent := false }
Instances For
Japanese: uniquely shifts in relative clauses under past too (tenses are intensional). tōji is restricted to past-oriented contexts.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
English: no shift under past; simultaneous reading under future comes from SOT deletion (will = WOLL + PRES, embedded PRES deleted by SOT).
Equations
- TsiliaZhao2026.englishProfile = { language := "English", pastAttitude := false, pastRelative := false, futAttitude := true, futRelative := true, sotDeletesPresent := true }
Instances For
The surveyed languages' tense-shift profiles.
Equations
Instances For
No language allows shift in relative clauses under past unless it also allows shift in attitude reports under past.
Under future, all surveyed languages shift, in attitude reports and relative clauses alike — WOLL is universally intensional.
English is the only surveyed language whose SOT deletes the present.
Japanese is the only surveyed language that shifts the present in a relative clause under past.
Perspective is not context #
The interpretation parameter tuple ⟨c, π⟩ from ⟦·⟧^{c,π,g}. Context c
(for indexicals, [AN04b]) and perspective π (for tense) are
independent parameters: shiftPerspective preserves context, and
shiftContext preserves perspective. This is the paper's argument that
the perspective can be identified with neither the context nor the
evaluation index: tense shift is possible without indexical shift
(Modern Greek shifts the present but never τώρα 'now'), and neither
shift is obligatory.
- context : Semantics.Context.KContext W E P T
Context parameter c = ⟨c_s, c_a, c_t, c_w⟩ — for indexicals (I, now, here)
- perspective : T
Temporal perspective π — for tense (PRES, PAST, ⌈then⌉). Defaults to c_t in root clauses; shifted by OP_π under attitude verbs.
Instances For
OP_π on the interpretation parameter tuple: shift π, preserve c.
Equations
- ip.shiftPerspective newPi = { context := ip.context, perspective := newPi }
Instances For
OP_c on the interpretation parameter tuple: shift c, preserve π.
Equations
- ip.shiftContext newC = { context := newC, perspective := ip.perspective }
Instances For
OP_π preserves the context parameter (including c_t): tense shift does not entail indexical shift.
OP_c preserves the temporal perspective: indexical shift does not entail tense shift.
In root clauses, π defaults to c_t: the Truth Convention evaluates ⟦φ⟧ relative to c and π = c_t.
Equations
- TsiliaZhao2026.InterpParams.rootDefault c = { context := c, perspective := c.time }
Instances For
After OP_π, c_t is unchanged — π and c_t can diverge.