Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Traugott2010

Traugott (2010): Subjectification and Intersubjectification #

[Tra10a] [TD02]

The diachronic hypothesis that lexical items acquire subjective and intersubjective meanings over time, in a fixed order:

nonsubjective → subjective → intersubjective

This is one of the best-supported unidirectional tendencies in semantic change, attested across modality, connectives, discourse markers, and spatial expressions. [Tra10a] is the consolidating statement of the program developed in [TD02].

The synchronic infrastructure (the SubjectivityLevel type and ordering) lives in Features.Subjectivity. This file formalizes the diachronic claims: that the ordering reflects a historical trajectory, that each transition is unidirectional, and that specific semantic domains exhibit this pattern.

Connections #

The diachronic cline #

A diachronic subjectification step: a word or construction acquires a meaning at a higher subjectivity level.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Canonical examples of subjectification. [TD02] Table 1, [Tra10a] §2.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        All canonical examples respect unidirectionality.

        Intersubjectification #

        Intersubjectification: the final stage of the cline, where meanings come to encode attention to the addressee's face/self-image.

        [Tra10a]: intersubjectification presupposes subjectification. An expression must first acquire speaker-oriented meaning before it can develop addressee-oriented meaning.

        The full cline is totally ordered.