Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Sharvit2003

[Sha03]: Embedded Tense and Universal Grammar #

[Sha03] [Abu97] [Ogi96]

Sharvit (Linguistic Inquiry 34(4), 2003) observes a cross-linguistic correlation between (a) the obligatoriness of utterance-time reference for present-under-past sentences and (b) the availability of a "vacuous" past tense in complement clauses. She proposes the Embeddability Principle (EP): any well-formed matrix LF must be embeddable under an attitude verb. The EP excludes "type 4" languages (no SOT rule + matrix-indexical present), predicting the attested typology of SOT/non-SOT and English/Hebrew/Modern Greek.

Empirical anchors (verified vs PDF) #

Scope of the Reichenbach frames below #

The frames cover the embedded-present-under-future shape (close to Sharvit's (3) but with future matrix). The (R,E)-frame cannot fully capture present-under-past double-access — see the JSON's ex3 for the empirical content. The Hebrew minimal pair (Sharvit's (5)/(6)) lives entirely in the JSON; structurally the past-form and present-form would produce identical (R,E)-frames so encoding the contrast as separate Lean defs would be vacuous.

Matrix "John will say..." — future tense, perfective.

Equations
Instances For

    Embedded present under future "Mary is sick" — sickness at the future saying time, R = P relative to the shifted perspective.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Matrix frame satisfies isFuture (R > P).

      Embedded present under future: R = P relative to shifted perspective.