[Sau04] — Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences #
Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3): 367–391.
The paper's derivation for disjunction, run through the consistency-gated
algorithm in Pragmatics/NeoGricean/Basic.lean (IsSecondaryImplicature,
implementing the paper's (42)/(43), verified p. 383): asserting A or B
against the alternatives {A, B, A∧B} yields the primary implicatures
¬KA, ¬KB, ¬K(A∧B). Of the candidate secondary implicatures, K¬(A∧B)
is consistent with the commitments and arises (conj_secondary),
while K¬A is blocked (disjunct_blocked): K¬A together with
K(A∨B) forces KB, contradicting the primary ¬KB. (The paper frames the same block dually:
K¬A contradicts the possibility implicature PA entailed by the
assertion plus ¬KB.) This asymmetry — "not both" arises but
"not A" does not — is the paper's signature prediction for disjunction,
unavailable to accounts that negate all stronger alternatives
indiscriminately.
The four-world model DisjWorld distinguishes worlds by which
disjuncts hold; the assertion A or B excludes only neither.
Equations
- Sauerland2004.instDecidableEqDisjWorld x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Sauerland2004.instReprDisjWorld = { reprPrec := Sauerland2004.instReprDisjWorld.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The first disjunct A.
Equations
Instances For
The second disjunct B.
Equations
Instances For
The assertion A or B.
Equations
Instances For
The conjunctive alternative A and B.
Equations
Instances For
The scalar alternatives to A or B: each disjunct and the conjunction.
Equations
Instances For
The secondary implicature that arises: K¬(A∧B) is consistent with
the assertion and all primary implicatures — witnessed by the
strengthened meaning disj \ conj, the state considering exactly
onlyA and onlyB possible. This is the "not both" inference of
A or B.
The blocked secondary implicature: K¬A is inconsistent with the
commitments. The strengthened meaning disj \ propA entails B, so K¬A
together with K(A∨B) forces KB — contradicting the primary implicature
¬KB (isSecondaryImplicature_iff: the single primary ¬KB blocks K¬A).
The disjuncts therefore yield only ignorance inferences, never "not A".
By the A↔B symmetry of the model, K¬B is blocked identically, by ¬KA.
The strengthened reading of A or B the algorithm predicts: assertion plus the licensed "not both", realizable at exactly the one-disjunct worlds.