Minimalist Nominal Spine → NP-Ellipsis [Saa26] #
Connects the Minimalist nominal extended projection (N → n → Q → Num → D) to the NP-ellipsis data in Spanish binominals.
Key Results #
- The nominal argument domain (nP = {N, n}) parallels the verbal argument domain (vP = {V, v}) at the same F-level cutoff.
- NP-ellipsis targets exactly the nominal argument domain: everything at or below n (F1) is deleted when Num carries [E].
- Pseudo-partitive and quantificational binominals have Num[E]; qualitative binominals lack it due to their EquP structure.
- The genitive source ([Pes13] primeval vs. equative) and the
verbal-agreement number track the same split, and the typed example
rows (
Data.Examples.Saab2026) conform to all predictions.
Nominal ellipsis licensing (relocated from Minimalist/Ellipsis/Nominal.lean) #
NP-ellipsis is licensed when the Num head carries an [E] feature, which permits PF-deletion of the nominal argument domain (complement of Num — everything at or below nP).
The nominal argument domain is {N, n} (F0–F1), parallel to the verbal argument domain {V, v}. Num (F2) and above are outside.
Nominal ellipsis license: Num[E] feature. NP-ellipsis is licensed when the Num head carries an [E] feature, which permits PF-deletion of the nominal argument domain (complement of Num — everything at or below nP).
- numHasE : Bool
Does Num carry [E]?
- argDomainBoundary : Minimalist.Cat
The nominal argument domain boundary (n for full DPs).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
N is within the nominal argument domain (F0 ≤ F1 = n).
n is within the nominal argument domain (F1 ≤ F1).
Num is NOT in the nominal argument domain (F2 > F1 = n).
Q is NOT in the nominal argument domain (F3 > F1 = n).
D is NOT in the nominal argument domain (F4 > F1 = n).
NP-ellipsis with Num[E]: pseudo-partitive/quantificational binominals license deletion of the nominal argument domain.
NP-ellipsis without Num[E]: qualitative binominals (with EquP + indexical empty noun) block NP-ellipsis.
The full nominal EP [N, n, Q, Num, D] is well-formed: category-consistent and F-monotone.
The nominal spine is structurally parallel to the verbal spine at all F-levels: lexical (F0) → categorizer (F1) → specification (F2) → inner edge (F3) → discourse (F4+).
At F2–F3, the parallel is structural (same EP zone) rather than functional: T specifies temporally while Q specifies via individuation; Fin types the clause while Num types the nominal.
The verbal and nominal argument domains use the same F-level boundary (F1): v for clauses, n for noun phrases.
The verbal argument domain is {V, v} (F0–F1). The nominal argument domain is {N, n} (F0–F1). Both exclude inflectional heads (T/Num at F2).
Build a NominalEllipsisLicense from a BinominalType.
Equations
- Saab2026.mkNominalLicense b = { numHasE := b.hasNumE }
Instances For
Pseudo-partitive Num[E] licenses NP-ellipsis.
Quantificational Num[E] licenses NP-ellipsis.
Qualitative lacks Num[E], blocking NP-ellipsis.
The licensing prediction matches the empirical data for every binominal type.
The structural source of the genitive de in a binominal.
- primeval : GenitiveSource
[Pes13]'s primeval genitive: default case assigned when D blocks structural case.
- equative : GenitiveSource
[dD06]-style EquP predication, not a true genitive.
Instances For
Equations
- Saab2026.instDecidableEqGenitiveSource x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Saab2026.instReprGenitiveSource = { reprPrec := Saab2026.instReprGenitiveSource.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Map a binominal type to its genitive source. Pseudo-partitive and quantificational binominals have the primeval genitive; qualitative binominals have the equative structure, whose indexical empty noun (contextually referential, like a pronoun) is unrecoverable at the ellipsis site.
Equations
- Saab2026.genitiveSource Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.pseudoPartitive = Saab2026.GenitiveSource.primeval
- Saab2026.genitiveSource Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.quantificational = Saab2026.GenitiveSource.primeval
- Saab2026.genitiveSource Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.qualitative = Saab2026.GenitiveSource.equative
Instances For
Primeval genitive ↔ NP-ellipsis licensed: the genitive source and Num[E]-driven licensing are coextensive across binominal types.
The number on the verb for each binominal type: Num inherits plural from the complement NP in pseudo-partitives and quantificationals, but gets singular from the expressive noun in qualitatives.
Equations
Instances For
Parse a binominal_type paper-feature value.
Equations
- Saab2026.binominalOfFeature "pseudo_partitive" = some Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.pseudoPartitive
- Saab2026.binominalOfFeature "quantificational" = some Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.quantificational
- Saab2026.binominalOfFeature "qualitative" = some Quantification.Binominal.BinominalType.qualitative
- Saab2026.binominalOfFeature x✝ = none
Instances For
Parse a verb_agreement paper-feature value.
Equations
- Saab2026.numberOfFeature "singular" = some Number.singular
- Saab2026.numberOfFeature "plural" = some Number.plural
- Saab2026.numberOfFeature x✝ = none
Instances For
Every example row's npe_grammatical and verb_agreement features
match the predictions (licensesNPE, verbAgreement) for its
binominal_type.
Each nominal functional head is EP-internal to the next higher head — complement selection proceeds up the nominal spine: N(F0) → n(F1) → Q(F2) → Num(F3) → D(F4).
Nominal heads are EP-external to verbal projections: a DP in Spec,vP is always EP-external (nominal ≠ verbal).