Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Saab2026

Minimalist Nominal Spine → NP-Ellipsis [Saa26] #

[Lob95] [Rit91]

Connects the Minimalist nominal extended projection (N → n → Q → Num → D) to the NP-ellipsis data in Spanish binominals.

Key Results #

  1. The nominal argument domain (nP = {N, n}) parallels the verbal argument domain (vP = {V, v}) at the same F-level cutoff.
  2. NP-ellipsis targets exactly the nominal argument domain: everything at or below n (F1) is deleted when Num carries [E].
  3. Pseudo-partitive and quantificational binominals have Num[E]; qualitative binominals lack it due to their EquP structure.
  4. The genitive source ([Pes13] primeval vs. equative) and the verbal-agreement number track the same split, and the typed example rows (Data.Examples.Saab2026) conform to all predictions.

Nominal ellipsis licensing (relocated from Minimalist/Ellipsis/Nominal.lean) #

[Mer01] [Saa26] [Lob95]

NP-ellipsis is licensed when the Num head carries an [E] feature, which permits PF-deletion of the nominal argument domain (complement of Num — everything at or below nP).

The nominal argument domain is {N, n} (F0–F1), parallel to the verbal argument domain {V, v}. Num (F2) and above are outside.

Nominal ellipsis license: Num[E] feature. NP-ellipsis is licensed when the Num head carries an [E] feature, which permits PF-deletion of the nominal argument domain (complement of Num — everything at or below nP).

  • numHasE : Bool

    Does Num carry [E]?

  • argDomainBoundary : Minimalist.Cat

    The nominal argument domain boundary (n for full DPs).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Is NP-ellipsis licensed? Requires Num[E].

        Equations
        Instances For

          Q is NOT in the nominal argument domain (F3 > F1 = n).

          D is NOT in the nominal argument domain (F4 > F1 = n).

          theorem Saab2026.pseudopartitive_licenses_npe :
          { numHasE := true }.isLicensed = true

          NP-ellipsis with Num[E]: pseudo-partitive/quantificational binominals license deletion of the nominal argument domain.

          theorem Saab2026.qualitative_blocks_npe :
          { numHasE := false }.isLicensed = false

          NP-ellipsis without Num[E]: qualitative binominals (with EquP + indexical empty noun) block NP-ellipsis.

          The full nominal EP [N, n, Q, Num, D] is well-formed: category-consistent and F-monotone.

          The nominal spine is structurally parallel to the verbal spine at all F-levels: lexical (F0) → categorizer (F1) → specification (F2) → inner edge (F3) → discourse (F4+).

          At F2–F3, the parallel is structural (same EP zone) rather than functional: T specifies temporally while Q specifies via individuation; Fin types the clause while Num types the nominal.

          The verbal and nominal argument domains use the same F-level boundary (F1): v for clauses, n for noun phrases.

          Build a NominalEllipsisLicense from a BinominalType.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The licensing prediction matches the empirical data for every binominal type.

            The structural source of the genitive de in a binominal.

            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Map a binominal type to its genitive source. Pseudo-partitive and quantificational binominals have the primeval genitive; qualitative binominals have the equative structure, whose indexical empty noun (contextually referential, like a pronoun) is unrecoverable at the ellipsis site.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Primeval genitive ↔ NP-ellipsis licensed: the genitive source and Num[E]-driven licensing are coextensive across binominal types.

                  The number on the verb for each binominal type: Num inherits plural from the complement NP in pseudo-partitives and quantificationals, but gets singular from the expressive noun in qualitatives.

                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    def Saab2026.numberOfFeature :
                    StringOption Number

                    Parse a verb_agreement paper-feature value.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      theorem Saab2026.examples_conform :
                      (Examples.all.all fun (e : Data.Examples.LinguisticExample) => match (List.lookup "binominal_type" e.paperFeatures).bind binominalOfFeature with | some b => List.lookup "npe_grammatical" e.paperFeatures == some (if b.licensesNPE = true then "true" else "false") && (List.lookup "verb_agreement" e.paperFeatures).bind numberOfFeature == some (verbAgreement b) | none => false) = true

                      Every example row's npe_grammatical and verb_agreement features match the predictions (licensesNPE, verbAgreement) for its binominal_type.

                      Each nominal functional head is EP-internal to the next higher head — complement selection proceeds up the nominal spine: N(F0) → n(F1) → Q(F2) → Num(F3) → D(F4).

                      Nominal heads are EP-external to verbal projections: a DP in Spec,vP is always EP-external (nominal ≠ verbal).