Documentation

Linglib.Studies.RappaportHovavLevin2024

Variable Agentivity: Polysemy or Underspecification? #

[RHL24]

A formalization of Rappaport Hovav & Levin's 2024 Glossa paper on the English verb sweep and the wiping-verbs class. The paper argues that the variable agentivity of sweepMatt swept the walk (agentive) vs the branch of the tree swept the window (non-agentive) — is the joint effect of two mechanisms, not one.

Main claims #

  1. basic-sweep is unspecified for agentivity. Its event structure ([RHL24] p.17, eq.42) is a complex activity with two grammatically relevant predicates: motion and force-transmission through contact. Either predicate can determine argument realization per-frame, yielding the simple transitive, transitive+PP, and unaccusative+PP frames attested in COCA.

  2. broom-sweep is obligatorily agentive. It is derived from basic-sweep by lexicalization of the moving entity as a broom ([Kip97] on canonical-use of denominal verbs). The broom's instrument status forces an agent who manipulates it; the broom's design purpose underlies the routine-activity narrowing that licenses the unspecified-object frame ([Gla22], [Bri94], [Mit05]). The two senses constitute motivated polysemy (distinct from regular polysemy à la Apresjan; zeugma test eq.35).

  3. The motion-and-sustained-contact event structure generalizes to the wiping-verbs class ([Lev93] 10.4): sweep, rub, scrape, wipe. Force-dynamic primitives follow [Tal88], [Cro12], [CH15], [GZ16].

  4. Counterexample to the resultative restriction. [Sch12a]'s and [FH08]'s claim that non-agentive external arguments require a result phrase fails for basic-sweep (eq.92: A breeze moved the willows, the tips of their branches sweeping the ground).

Main declarations #

Implementation notes #

This file does not add a fifth case to Semantics.Lexical.EventStructure.Template. RHL 2024's contribution is an enrichment of the internal structure of the activity template for one manner subclass — two grammatically relevant predicates instead of one — and a per-frame choice of which predicate determines argument realization. The current Template.motionContact case in Features/EventStructure.lean is a misformalization of the 2024 paper and is queued for removal.

Footnote 31 of the paper explicitly disclaims the asymmetric "x moves... while x imparts..." formulation: the subordination is prose-only. Footnote 32 generalizes the mechanism beyond sweep to locative alternation ([RHL98] 1c–d), substance-emission verbs ([LK19]), and drown.

Todo #

Force-dynamic primitives #

Role in a force-transmission sub-event ([Tal88], [Cro12], [GZ16]).

In basic-sweep's event structure (p.17, eq.42), x is the force-bearer (it imparts the force) and y is the force-recipient (the surface receiving the force throughout the contact).

  • bearer : ForceRole

    Force-bearer: imparts force via motion-induced contact (x in eq.42).

  • recipient : ForceRole

    Force-recipient: receives force throughout the contact (y; the surface).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      The ontological types of entity that can occupy the basic-sweep subject position. The paper restricts the moving entity to entities capable of motion across a surface (p.5).

      naturalPhenomenon and projectile together qualify as effectors in the strict sense (p.25): self-energetic. Agents are effectors via intentional control. Instruments and body parts qualify as force-bearers only under agent control (footnote 9, p.7).

      • agent : Effector

        Volitional, intentional human or animal participant ([Cru73], [VVW96], p.7).

      • naturalPhenomenon : Effector

        Wind, fire, water, storms — inherently self-energetic (p.25).

      • projectile : Effector

        Physical objects with kinetic energy imparted by an unmentioned causer; can transmit that energy through contact ([Kea00] on projectiles; p.23).

      • machine : Effector

        Self-propelled artifact (footnote 9, p.7); patterns with agents grammatically but not in the strict animate-intentional sense.

      • instrument : Effector

        Instrument or body part. Cannot be a force-bearer without an agent providing the energy (p.21, p.25).

      • displacedEntity : Effector

        Displaced entity moved along the surface (basic-sweep with transitive+PP frame; p.21).

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          @[reducible, inline]

          An effector qualifies as a basic-sweep simple-transitive subject under the contact-determines-AR derivation (p.24-25) iff it is self-energetic.

          Equations
          Instances For

            An effector can intentionally manipulate an instrument ([RHL24] p.7, footnote 9). Only agents and self-propelled machines pattern this way; machines pattern with agents grammatically but are not animate-intentional. Natural phenomena and projectiles, despite being self-energetic, do not manipulate instruments.

            Equations
            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

              The basic-sweep event structure (eq. 42) #

              The grammatically relevant meaning components of sweep and other verbs in the wiping-verbs class. Encoded as a structure type so that broom-sweep (with the moving entity lexicalized) is derived by field-level minimal adjustment per [RHL24] §3.5 (eq.76).

              The motion-and-sustained-contact event structure ([RHL24] p.17, eq.42):

              x moves across a surface y while x imparts a force to y through contact

              Two grammatically relevant predicates: a motion predicate and a force-transmission predicate, sharing the moving entity x. Footnote 31 disclaims the "while" subordination — there is no theoretical significance to which predicate is "main"; the two are equipotent in determining argument realization.

              The movingEntityLexicalization field carries broom-sweep's lexical saturation (eq.76: x_broom); none is basic-sweep.

              • movingEntityLexicalization : Option String

                Lexicalization status of the moving entity x. none = unsaturated (basic-sweep); some "broom" = basic-sweep's moving-entity variable saturated by broom (broom-sweep). Other instrument-lexicalizations in English ([HH07]): comb, funnel, hoe, mop, plow, rake, saw, shovel, staple, towel, whip (paper eq.77).

              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    basic-sweep: the underspecified base sense. Moving entity x is unsaturated; subject can be agent, natural phenomenon, projectile, or displaced entity depending on the frame and which predicate determines argument realization.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      broom-sweep: the specialized agentive sense (eq.76). Moving entity x is lexically saturated as a broom; the broom's instrument status forces an agent.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        An event structure is lexically saturated iff its moving entity variable is fixed.

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          @[implicit_reducible]
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                          Argument-realization principles ((43)-(45)) #

                          Per-frame choice of which predicate in the event structure [RHL24] (eq.42) determines argument realization.

                          "When an event structure includes two grammatically relevant predicates, the argument realization principles are applied with respect to only one" (p.18, after eq.47).

                          The choice is per-frame, not per-verb: basic-sweep admits both motion-determines and contact-determines derivations of distinct frames from the same lexical entry.

                          • motion : DeterminingPredicate

                            Motion determines: principle (43) applies, yielding a small-clause realization where the moving entity is the small-clause subject and a path PP is the predicate. Yields unaccusative+PP and transitive+PP frames.

                          • contact : DeterminingPredicate

                            Contact determines: principles (44)-(45) apply, force-recipient → internal argument, effector → external argument. Yields simple transitive and unspecified-object frames.

                          Instances For
                            @[implicit_reducible]
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Syntactic frames #

                              The five syntactic frames attested for the wiping-verbs class ([RHL24] §2, p.5-13).

                              • simpleTransitive : Frame

                                the branch of the tree swept the window: contact determines AR from basic-sweep. Subject is force-bearer/effector; surface is direct object.

                              • transitivePP : Frame

                                the wind swept the fires through the top growth: motion determines AR; CAUSE applied on top (eq.50, causativized counterpart of eq.47). Subject is causer; moving entity is direct object; path is PP.

                              • unaccusativePP : Frame

                                the fires swept through the top growth: motion determines AR without external causer (eq.46, eq.47); unaccusative+PP frame from basic-sweep's underlying event structure.

                              • unspecifiedObject : Frame

                                Yesterday I swept in the morning: contact determines AR from broom-sweep; surface omitted under routine-activity narrowing ([Gla22], [Bri94], [Mit05]).

                              Instances For
                                @[implicit_reducible]
                                Equations
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Argument-realization principles (eqs. 43-45) applied to an event structure with a given determining-predicate choice. Outputs the predicted frame, or none when the derivation is blocked.

                                  • (43a) An entity in motion along a path is the subject of a small clause. Requires the moving entity variable to be available for syntactic expression — fails if x is lexically saturated (p.30, after eq.86).
                                  • (43b) A path is the predicate of a small clause.
                                  • (44) A force recipient is an internal argument.
                                  • (45) An effector is an external argument.

                                  The hasCauser parameter encodes whether an external z is added (eq.50: z causes x to move across y while x imparts a force to y); without it, the motion-determined frame is unaccusative+PP.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Variable agentivity in basic-sweep #

                                    basic-sweep's simple transitive frame admits non-agentive subjects provided the subject is a self-energetic effector (p.25). This is the variable agentivity of basic-sweep.

                                    basic-sweep admits an agentive subject in the simple transitive frame, but only with a with phrase specifying body part or instrument to provide a force-bearer (p.25 on The harpist swept the strings of her instrument ??(with a bow)). The agent qualifies as effector by (45); the body part / instrument is the force-bearer.

                                    This is captured at the type level: an agent Effector qualifies as a simple-transitive subject because it's self-energetic via intentional control. The with-phrase requirement is a separate condition on the syntactic frame, not on the effector classification.

                                    [RvPM22]: body parts as instrument-like extensions of the subject.

                                    An instrument or body part by itself cannot be a basic-sweep simple transitive subject (p.21: body part and instrument options are not found without an agent). They are not self-energetic.

                                    Obligatory agentivity in broom-sweep #

                                    broom-sweep's lexically saturated moving entity is a broom — an artifact-noun-derived instrument ([Kip97] on canonical-use). Brooms require intentional manipulation (paper footnote 9, p.7); therefore the external argument of broom-sweep must be capable of intentional instrument manipulation: agent or machine.

                                    This is the obligatory agentivity of broom-sweep.

                                    The proof factors through Effector.canManipulateInstrument: only agent and machine qualify, matching the disjunction in the conclusion.

                                    broom-sweep lacks the causative alternation #

                                    broom-sweep is obligatorily agentive (above), and lacks the causative alternation: Danny swept the floor / *The floor swept (p.12, eq.31).

                                    At the level of the event-structure-to-frame mapping: motion-determines AR is unavailable for broom-sweep because x_broom is lexically saturated and cannot serve as the small-clause subject required by principle (43a) (p.30, after eq.86). The realizeFrame function encodes this: motion-determines on a saturated event structure returns none.

                                    Conversely, broom-sweep can still derive a frame via the contact predicate: the simple transitive frame I swept the floor. The unspecified-object frame Yesterday I swept in the morning is a distinct realization licensed by routine-activity narrowing (separate from realizeFrame which folds it into simpleTransitive; see LicensesUnspecifiedObject below).

                                    Counterexample to the resultative restriction #

                                    [Sch12a]'s resultative restriction: non-agentive external arguments require a result phrase in the VP (or imply one). [FH08] refined this to external arguments lacking teleological capability.

                                    basic-sweep with the contact-determines derivation falsifies both: A breeze moved the willows, the tips of their branches sweeping the ground (eq.92) — inanimate, non-teleological external argument, no explicit or implied result.

                                    This is the paper's central empirical departure from the literature on external-argument licensing.

                                    Routine-activity narrowing #

                                    broom-sweep's unspecified-object frame is licensed by routine-activity narrowing ([Gla22], [Bri94], [Mit05]): denominal-like verbs derived via lexicalization of artifacts come to refer to culturally-recognized routine activities for which the canonical-purpose object can be omitted.

                                    Parallel cases (p.28-29):

                                    • mop (denominal from mop, the canonical activity is floor-mopping)
                                    • bake (non-denominal but specialized to baked-goods preparation in the unspecified-object frame: I baked this morning ≠ baking potatoes)
                                    • clean ([LRH14])
                                    • wash (Alexiadou et al. 2017 from the references)

                                    basic-sweep does NOT license the unspecified-object frame (p.13: in the basic-sweep sense the verb is never found with unspecified objects in any syntactic frame).

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      Motivated polysemy #

                                      The paper distinguishes its analysis of sweep's two senses from "regular polysemy" ([Apr73], Pustejovsky 1995, 1998, [Nun95], [Cru95], [Dol14]) by two diagnostics:

                                      1. Zeugma test (Zwicky & Sadock 1975, Cruse 1986, Asher 2011 §3-4; p.13 eq.35): co-predication of the two senses is odd. #The sailor swept the deck and so did the rain. Regular polysemy (e.g., book = text/object) allows co-predication; broom-sweep/basic-sweep do not.

                                      2. Idiosyncratic lexicalization: broom-sweep lexicalizes broom as the moving entity, but this is an idiosyncratic fact about English — there is no general process making instrument-lexicalized senses of all motion-contact verbs (p.28: English exceptionally lacks denominal broom, with sweep blocking it).

                                      Motivated polysemy: two related senses sharing a root and overlapping event structure, but not co-predicable (failing the zeugma test).

                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          sweep's two senses constitute motivated polysemy.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            Wiping-verbs class generalization #

                                            The motion-and-sustained-contact event structure generalizes to the [Lev93] class 10.4 (wiping verbs): sweep, rub, scrape, wipe. The paper establishes generalization in §2.3-2.4 (p.13-14): rub and scrape show the same constellation of syntactic frames as basic-sweep, supporting the contention that basic-sweep's event structure is shared by the class. wipe itself is not explicitly worked through but is assumed to pattern with the class ([LRH91]).

                                            These verbs differ in lexicalized manner (the type of motion-with-contact):

                                            • sweep: extended movement across a planar surface, contact during trajectory ([McNS22]).
                                            • rub: contact with pressure, back-and-forth or circular movement.
                                            • scrape: similar to sweep but with a harder contact and removal affordance.
                                            • wipe: similar to sweep, often with a cloth-like instrument.
                                            Instances For
                                              @[implicit_reducible]
                                              Equations
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                Every wiping verb has basic-sweep's event structure as its basic sense (§2.3-2.4).

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For

                                                  Only sweep has an attested broom-sense in English (p.13-14, p.28). rub and scrape lack a specialized agentive sub-sense.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For
                                                    @[implicit_reducible]
                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                                    Bridge to existing substrate #

                                                    The wiping-verbs class corresponds to [Lev93] class 10.4, encoded as LevinClass.wipe in Linglib/Semantics/Lexical/LevinClass.lean. Verbs in this class share the basic-sweep event structure.