Partee & Borschev 2001: Some puzzles of predicate possessives #
Paper-anchored consumer of the possessive substrate for [PB01]. P&B argue against the uniform "argument-only" analysis of possessives ([JV94]) using predicate possessives: a possessive occurs as a bare predicate (type ⟨e,t⟩) only when its possession relation is a free contextual variable (a modifier genitive), not when it is the inherent relation of a relational noun or adjective (an argument genitive).
The argument/modifier distinction is study-local: it is P&B's analysis of a
construction, contested by [VJ02] (who deny the split is
grammatical), so it is not a field of the theory-neutral substrate carrier
(Possessive.Carrier). The predicate form itself is substrate — the bare
⟨e,t⟩ possessive predicate is Possessive.viaArgument (the relation applied to
the possessor).
Main statements #
canBePredicate_iff_modifier— predicativity is exactly modifier-provenance.team_predicate_ok/brother_predicate_bad/favoriteMovie_predicate_bad— P&B (1c)–(3c): that team is John's ✓, #that brother/favorite movie is John's (decide-checked from the relation source).RussianForm.predicativity— the morphosyntactically overt confirmation (§2.2): the Russian genitive NP (argument) cannot predicate, the prenominal possessive (modifier) can.predicateForm_eq_viaArgument— the bare predicate possessive is the substratePossessive.viaArgumentpredicate.
References #
Relation provenance and predicativity #
The argument/modifier distinction is P&B's analytical classification of a construction, kept study-local (V&J reject it).
The provenance of a genitive's possession relation: supplied lexically by a relational noun/adjective (argument) or as a free contextual variable (modifier).
- argument : RelationProvenance
Inherent/lexical relation — the argument genitive.
- modifier : RelationProvenance
Free contextual relation — the modifier genitive.
Instances For
Equations
- ParteeBorschev2001.instDecidableEqRelationProvenance x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A possessive occurs as a bare predicate (that team is John's) iff its relation is modifier-provenance. Argument genitives cannot — P&B's central generalization.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Predicativity is exactly modifier-provenance. Inverting the provenance flips the prediction, so the distinction is not decorative.
English predicate possessives (P&B 2001 (1)–(3)) #
The genitive relation has three sources: the context (a free R, with a plain
noun), an inherently relational noun (brother), or an inherently relational
adjective (favorite). Only the contextual source is a modifier.
The three sources of the genitive relation (P&B 2001 §1.1).
- context : RelationSource
Free contextual relation (plain noun, e.g. team).
- relationalNoun : RelationSource
Inherent relation of a relational noun (brother).
- relationalAdjective : RelationSource
Inherent relation of a relational adjective (favorite).
Instances For
Equations
- ParteeBorschev2001.instDecidableEqRelationSource x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Only the contextual source yields a modifier genitive; the two inherent sources yield argument genitives.
Equations
- ParteeBorschev2001.RelationSource.context.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.modifier
- ParteeBorschev2001.RelationSource.relationalNoun.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.argument
- ParteeBorschev2001.RelationSource.relationalAdjective.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.argument
Instances For
P&B (1c) that team is John's — acceptable: contextual relation (modifier).
P&B (2c) #that brother is John's — degraded: relational noun (argument).
P&B (3c) #that favorite movie is John's — degraded: relational adjective (argument). The whole N-bar favorite movie supplies the relation.
Russian: overt morphosyntax (P&B 2001 §2.2) #
In Russian the distinction is visible in the form: the genitive NP (Peti) is uniformly argument-like and cannot occur in predicate position, while the prenominal quasi-adjectival possessive (Petin) and possessive pronouns admit the modifier reading and can.
Russian possessive forms and their relation provenance (P&B 2001 §2.2).
- genitiveNP : RussianForm
Postnominal genitive NP, Peti — uniformly argument.
- prenominalPossessive : RussianForm
Prenominal quasi-adjectival possessive, Petin — admits modifier.
- possessivePronoun : RussianForm
Possessive pronoun, moj — admits modifier.
Instances For
Equations
- ParteeBorschev2001.instDecidableEqRussianForm x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Provenance of each Russian form.
Equations
- ParteeBorschev2001.RussianForm.genitiveNP.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.argument
- ParteeBorschev2001.RussianForm.prenominalPossessive.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.modifier
- ParteeBorschev2001.RussianForm.possessivePronoun.provenance = ParteeBorschev2001.RelationProvenance.modifier
Instances For
The overt confirmation: a Russian form occurs as a predicate iff it is not the (argument-only) genitive NP.
The predicate form is substrate #
The bare predicate possessive John's (λx. R(John)(x)) is the substrate
Possessive.viaArgument — the relation applied to the possessor, a genuine
⟨e,t⟩ predicate that the uniform argument-only approach cannot produce
standalone.