Documentation

Linglib.Studies.ParteeBorschev2001

Partee & Borschev 2001: Some puzzles of predicate possessives #

Paper-anchored consumer of the possessive substrate for [PB01]. P&B argue against the uniform "argument-only" analysis of possessives ([JV94]) using predicate possessives: a possessive occurs as a bare predicate (type ⟨e,t⟩) only when its possession relation is a free contextual variable (a modifier genitive), not when it is the inherent relation of a relational noun or adjective (an argument genitive).

The argument/modifier distinction is study-local: it is P&B's analysis of a construction, contested by [VJ02] (who deny the split is grammatical), so it is not a field of the theory-neutral substrate carrier (Possessive.Carrier). The predicate form itself is substrate — the bare ⟨e,t⟩ possessive predicate is Possessive.viaArgument (the relation applied to the possessor).

Main statements #

References #

Relation provenance and predicativity #

The argument/modifier distinction is P&B's analytical classification of a construction, kept study-local (V&J reject it).

The provenance of a genitive's possession relation: supplied lexically by a relational noun/adjective (argument) or as a free contextual variable (modifier).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A possessive occurs as a bare predicate (that team is John's) iff its relation is modifier-provenance. Argument genitives cannot — P&B's central generalization.

      Equations
      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

        Predicativity is exactly modifier-provenance. Inverting the provenance flips the prediction, so the distinction is not decorative.

        English predicate possessives (P&B 2001 (1)–(3)) #

        The genitive relation has three sources: the context (a free R, with a plain noun), an inherently relational noun (brother), or an inherently relational adjective (favorite). Only the contextual source is a modifier.

        The three sources of the genitive relation (P&B 2001 §1.1).

        • context : RelationSource

          Free contextual relation (plain noun, e.g. team).

        • relationalNoun : RelationSource

          Inherent relation of a relational noun (brother).

        • relationalAdjective : RelationSource

          Inherent relation of a relational adjective (favorite).

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            P&B (1c) that team is John's — acceptable: contextual relation (modifier).

            P&B (2c) #that brother is John's — degraded: relational noun (argument).

            P&B (3c) #that favorite movie is John's — degraded: relational adjective (argument). The whole N-bar favorite movie supplies the relation.

            Russian: overt morphosyntax (P&B 2001 §2.2) #

            In Russian the distinction is visible in the form: the genitive NP (Peti) is uniformly argument-like and cannot occur in predicate position, while the prenominal quasi-adjectival possessive (Petin) and possessive pronouns admit the modifier reading and can.

            Russian possessive forms and their relation provenance (P&B 2001 §2.2).

            • genitiveNP : RussianForm

              Postnominal genitive NP, Peti — uniformly argument.

            • prenominalPossessive : RussianForm

              Prenominal quasi-adjectival possessive, Petin — admits modifier.

            • possessivePronoun : RussianForm

              Possessive pronoun, moj — admits modifier.

            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                The overt confirmation: a Russian form occurs as a predicate iff it is not the (argument-only) genitive NP.

                The predicate form is substrate #

                The bare predicate possessive John's (λx. R(John)(x)) is the substrate Possessive.viaArgument — the relation applied to the possessor, a genuine ⟨e,t⟩ predicate that the uniform argument-only approach cannot produce standalone.

                theorem ParteeBorschev2001.predicateForm_eq_viaArgument {E : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} (possessor : E) (R : ArgumentStructure.Relational.Pred2 E S) :
                (fun (x : E) (s : S) => R possessor x s) = Possessive.viaArgument possessor R