Pantcheva 2011: syncretism in directional expressions #
The directional containment object Place ⊂ Goal ⊂ Source ⊂ Route lives in
Syntax/Case/Order.lean (Case.PathDir); this study tests its
syncretism prediction. Of the logically possible syncretism patterns
over the four path roles, only a few are attested, under two constraints
([Pan11] §9.2):
- *ABA (contiguity): a syncretism targets only adjacent heads on
the containment chain — the framework-neutral
Morphology.Containmentobject, the same used for nominal case allomorphy ([Cah09], [Bob12]). - *A&¬A: Goal and Source never share a marker. Source is the semantic reversal of Goal ([Pan11] §9.2.2), so a Goal=Source marker would be contradictory — a pragmatic constraint, not a structural one.
Together they cut the 15 set-partitions of {Place, Goal, Source, Route}
to four possible patterns (possible_syncretisms), Pantcheva's
Types 1–4. (Her Tables 9.2/9.3 enumerate 14, omitting one *ABA-excluded
pattern — Goal=Route skipping Source; the enumeration here is over all
15.) Attested instantiations (her Table 9.4): English at/to/from
(all distinct, Type 1); Estonian -l/-l-le/-l-t and Imbabura
Quechua -pi/-man/-man-da, where the Source marker morphologically
contains the Goal marker — the shell containment made visible; Georgian
Location=Goal (Type 3, her Table 9.1).
Main declarations #
Pantcheva2011.possible— the two-constraint filter (*ABA viaContainment, *A&¬A viaGoalSourceMerged)Pantcheva2011.possible_syncretisms— exactly the four attested patterns;four_possible,aba_excluded,ana_excludedPantcheva2011.source_contains_goal— the morphological-containment fact, read off the sharedPathDirshell decomposition
A syncretism pattern over the four path roles, in containment order
[Place, Goal, Source, Route], as form-class indices: the n = 4
instance of Morphology.Containment.Pattern.
Equations
Instances For
The 15 canonical syncretism patterns — restricted-growth strings over four positions, i.e. the set-partitions of {Place, Goal, Source, Route} up to relabeling.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
*A&¬A: Goal (position 1) and Source (position 2) share a form class. Forbidden — Source is the reversal of Goal, so a Goal=Source marker is contradictory ([Pan11] §9.2.2).
Equations
- Pantcheva2011.GoalSourceMerged p = (p 1 = p 2)
Instances For
A syncretism pattern is possible iff it is contiguous (*ABA, via
the shared Morphology.Containment object) and keeps Goal distinct
from Source (*A&¬A).
Equations
Instances For
The syncretism typology ([Pan11] Tables 9.2/9.3): of the 15 logically possible patterns, exactly four are attested — the contiguous ones keeping Goal and Source distinct. These are her Types 1–4: all-distinct (Type 1, English), Place=Goal (Type 3, Georgian), Source=Route (Type 2), and Place=Goal with Source=Route (Type 4).
Exactly four syncretism patterns are possible.
Seven of the eleven excluded patterns violate *ABA (non-contiguous — a syncretism spanning non-adjacent path roles).
The remaining four excluded patterns are contiguous but merge Goal with Source — the *A&¬A constraint, unique to the directional domain (the nominal Caha containment has no analogue).
Morphological containment (Table 4.2) #
The Source structure contains the Goal structure, visible where the
Source marker contains the Goal marker (Quechua -man ⊂ -man-da).
This is the shell containment of the shared PathDir object — not a
fact re-stipulated here, but read off Case.PathDir.shells.
Source contains Goal contains Place, as shell-stack inclusion — the morphological-containment fact, from the substrate decomposition.
Georgian's Location=Goal syncretism ([Pan11] Table 9.1) is one of the four possible patterns (Type 3).
The *A&¬A constraint, grounded in the denotation (Ch. 5) #
The Goal=Source exclusion (GoalSourceMerged) is not a stipulation: it
follows from the directional interpretation. Source denotes the
reversal of Goal (PathDir.source_denote_eq_goal_reverse, §5.4), so
Goal and Source have distinct, in fact opposite, denotations — a single
marker for both would be semantically contradictory.
Goal and Source have distinct denotations (Source reverses Goal), so a
Goal=Source marker would be contradictory — the semantic ground of the
*A&¬A constraint that excludes GoalSourceMerged patterns.