Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Pantcheva2011

Pantcheva 2011: syncretism in directional expressions #

[Pan11] [Bob12] [Cah09]

The directional containment object Place ⊂ Goal ⊂ Source ⊂ Route lives in Syntax/Case/Order.lean (Case.PathDir); this study tests its syncretism prediction. Of the logically possible syncretism patterns over the four path roles, only a few are attested, under two constraints ([Pan11] §9.2):

Together they cut the 15 set-partitions of {Place, Goal, Source, Route} to four possible patterns (possible_syncretisms), Pantcheva's Types 1–4. (Her Tables 9.2/9.3 enumerate 14, omitting one *ABA-excluded pattern — Goal=Route skipping Source; the enumeration here is over all 15.) Attested instantiations (her Table 9.4): English at/to/from (all distinct, Type 1); Estonian -l/-l-le/-l-t and Imbabura Quechua -pi/-man/-man-da, where the Source marker morphologically contains the Goal marker — the shell containment made visible; Georgian Location=Goal (Type 3, her Table 9.1).

Main declarations #

@[reducible, inline]

A syncretism pattern over the four path roles, in containment order [Place, Goal, Source, Route], as form-class indices: the n = 4 instance of Morphology.Containment.Pattern.

Equations
Instances For

    The 15 canonical syncretism patterns — restricted-growth strings over four positions, i.e. the set-partitions of {Place, Goal, Source, Route} up to relabeling.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      *A&¬A: Goal (position 1) and Source (position 2) share a form class. Forbidden — Source is the reversal of Goal, so a Goal=Source marker is contradictory ([Pan11] §9.2.2).

      Equations
      Instances For

        A syncretism pattern is possible iff it is contiguous (*ABA, via the shared Morphology.Containment object) and keeps Goal distinct from Source (*A&¬A).

        Equations
        Instances For
          theorem Pantcheva2011.possible_syncretisms :
          List.filter (fun (p : Pattern) => decide (Possible p)) allPatterns = [![0, 0, 1, 1], ![0, 0, 1, 2], ![0, 1, 2, 2], ![0, 1, 2, 3]]

          The syncretism typology ([Pan11] Tables 9.2/9.3): of the 15 logically possible patterns, exactly four are attested — the contiguous ones keeping Goal and Source distinct. These are her Types 1–4: all-distinct (Type 1, English), Place=Goal (Type 3, Georgian), Source=Route (Type 2), and Place=Goal with Source=Route (Type 4).

          theorem Pantcheva2011.four_possible :
          (List.filter (fun (p : Pattern) => decide (Possible p)) allPatterns).length = 4

          Exactly four syncretism patterns are possible.

          theorem Pantcheva2011.aba_excluded :
          (List.filter (fun (p : Morphology.Containment.Pattern 4 ) => decide ¬Morphology.Containment.IsContiguous p) allPatterns).length = 7

          Seven of the eleven excluded patterns violate *ABA (non-contiguous — a syncretism spanning non-adjacent path roles).

          The remaining four excluded patterns are contiguous but merge Goal with Source — the *A&¬A constraint, unique to the directional domain (the nominal Caha containment has no analogue).

          Morphological containment (Table 4.2) #

          The Source structure contains the Goal structure, visible where the Source marker contains the Goal marker (Quechua -man-man-da). This is the shell containment of the shared PathDir object — not a fact re-stipulated here, but read off Case.PathDir.shells.

          Source contains Goal contains Place, as shell-stack inclusion — the morphological-containment fact, from the substrate decomposition.

          Georgian's Location=Goal syncretism ([Pan11] Table 9.1) is one of the four possible patterns (Type 3).

          The *A&¬A constraint, grounded in the denotation (Ch. 5) #

          The Goal=Source exclusion (GoalSourceMerged) is not a stipulation: it follows from the directional interpretation. Source denotes the reversal of Goal (PathDir.source_denote_eq_goal_reverse, §5.4), so Goal and Source have distinct, in fact opposite, denotations — a single marker for both would be semantically contradictory.

          Goal and Source have distinct denotations (Source reverses Goal), so a Goal=Source marker would be contradictory — the semantic ground of the *A&¬A constraint that excludes GoalSourceMerged patterns.