Documentation

Linglib.Studies.NapoliNespor1976

Napoli & Nespor (1976): Negatives in Comparatives #

Italian non appears in some comparative clauses without truth-conditional effect: Maria è più intelligente di quanto non sia Carlo 'Maria is more intelligent than Carlo (is)'. Earlier accounts treated this non₂ as a pleonastic element ([AP71]) or as surface evidence that than-clauses are underlyingly negative ([Seu69]). [NN76] (Language 52(4), 811–838) reject both: non₂ is real negation, licensed by a discourse condition — the speaker presupposes that the assertion contradicts a prior belief, the move is assertive, the matrix is unnegated, and neither the contradicted belief nor the construction involves precise knowledge. The licensing predicate is formalized once as Pragmatics.Bias.BiasLicensingProfile.licenses; this file is its first historical attestation, applied to the paper's Italian data. The paper's own implementation — a Generative Semantics abstract higher clause hosting non₂, optionally deleted — is historical; only the licensing predicate and its surface diagnostics are preserved.

Main declarations #

The acceptability paradigm #

The licensing conditions are established through an acceptability paradigm. Four dialogues between Dario and Paolo vary the speaker's epistemic state: non₂ is felicitous exactly when the assertion contradicts a belief inferred from the interlocutor's prior discourse. Construction-level environments then isolate the remaining conditions (equality and explicit-degree comparatives both fail the precision condition; meno-comparatives are the positive control), and indirect questions show the condition is a property of the discourse move, not of comparative syntax.

One row of the acceptability paradigm: a dialogue context or construction, its bias-licensing profile, and the reported acceptability of non₂.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Dario gives no opinion of Maria or Carlo; Paolo asserts Maria > Carlo: no prior belief to contradict.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Dario implies Carlo would beat Maria at chess; Paolo asserts Maria is more intelligent: the contradicted belief is inferred.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Dario explicitly calls Maria stupid; Paolo disagrees: the contradicted belief is explicitly stated rather than inferred, failing the imprecise/inferred condition.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Dario's complaint implies he expects Maria cannot help; Paolo asserts she is smart enough to ask: the contradicted belief is inferred.

            Equations
            Instances For

              È più intelligente di quanto non sia Carlo? 'Is she more intelligent than Carlo?': questioning is non-assertive.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Maria non è più intelligente di quanto non sia Carlo: the matrix is negated.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Equality comparatives (Maria è tanto intelligente quanto è Carlo) demand explicit, precise knowledge of the compared degrees, while non₂ demands inferred, imprecise knowledge.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Explicit degree modifiers (molto più intelligente, due metri più alta) require precise knowledge of the degree gap.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Maria è meno intelligente di quanto tu non creda 'Maria is less intelligent than you think': meno-comparatives admit non₂ under the same contextual conditions as più. Negated equality comparatives are semantically close to meno-comparatives yet reject non₂, so the equality restriction cannot reduce to equality linking two similar things (contra [Seu69] and [AP71]); it follows from matrix negation and the precision condition.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Chissà se non vale la pena di comprarlo 'Who knows if it's (not) worth buying it': an indirect question whose negated proposition the speaker presupposes to be contrary to expectation, licensed by the same profile as the comparatives.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The paper's acceptability paradigm.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            The licensing predicate reproduces the paper's judgment on every row of the paradigm.

                            Morphosyntactic diagnostics for underlying negation #

                            Six surface diagnostics witness underlying negation in the comparative clause. Two are forced choices — mood morphology and indefinite specificity. Four are admissibility asymmetries — complementizer che, predicative clitic lo, the weak NPI pur, and neanche-conjunction: the bias-marked alternant is possible only under licensed non₂, while the default (di quanto, clitic-less repetition) remains available throughout. The NPI diagnostics are derived from the Italian Fragment's licensingContexts registry.

                            Specificity of indefinites embedded in the than-clause.

                            • unrestricted : SpecificityProfile

                              Both [+specific] and [−specific] readings available.

                            • nonspecificOnly : SpecificityProfile

                              Restricted to [−specific] under the scope of underlying negation.

                            Instances For
                              @[instance_reducible]
                              Equations
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                The Italian comparative complementizers.

                                Instances For
                                  @[instance_reducible]
                                  Equations
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Presence of the predicative clitic lo substituting for a repeated predicate adjective in the than-clause.

                                    Instances For
                                      @[instance_reducible]
                                      Equations
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Mood of the than-clause: subjunctive exactly when non₂ is underlyingly present, indicative otherwise (lexical mood control by credere etc. is abstracted away). Surface subjunctive without non is derived by the paper's optional deletion of an underlying non₂.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Clitic admissibility: clitic-less comparatives are always available; lo is possible only under non₂, and optional there.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Neanche-conjunction ('and not even …') is admissible iff its host clause is negated at some underlying level — in a comparative, iff non₂ is licensed. The negation requirement is the Fragment registry fact that neanche lists .negation among its licensing contexts.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              The mood diagnostic tracks the licensing predicate: the than-clause is subjunctive exactly on licensed profiles.

                                              Neanche-conjunction is admissible under licensed non₂; the second conjunct is the Fragment's registry datum.

                                              The pur / affatto contrast #

                                              The weak NPI pur is licensed in non₂-comparatives; the weak NPI affatto is blocked, because affatto requires precise knowledge of the contradicted belief — incompatible with the imprecise/inferred licensing condition (a footnote observation of [NN76]). The contrast is witnessed at the lexical layer: pur.licensingContexts lists the clausal-comparative slot .clausalComparative while affatto's does not, so the predictions below are derived from the Fragment registry.

                                              A weak NPI is admissible in a bias-conditioned comparative iff its registry lists the clausal-comparative slot (surface phrasal comparatives are not NPI environments) and the profile licenses non₂.

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For

                                                Pur is admissible wherever non₂ is licensed; the registry conjunct is the Fragment's pur_licensed_in_comparative.

                                                Affatto is inadmissible in non₂-comparatives whatever the bias profile: the block is registered in the lexical entry itself.