McMullin (2016) [McM16] #
Tier-based locality in long-distance phonotactics: learnability and typology. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.
A long-distance phonotactic can be stated over subsequences — a forbidden pair of segments however far apart, the strictly piecewise (SP) description — or over a tier projection — delete the transparent material, then forbid adjacent pairs, the tier-based strictly local (TSL) description. [McM16] argues for the tier-based class: SP grammars cannot see a blocker, an intervening segment that halts harmony, because deleting material can never turn an SP-legal word illegal.
Both halves are formalised here.
- Transparent harmony: the classes coincide. Navajo sibilant harmony — the
[Han10] case study formalised as TSL_2 in
Studies/Hansson2010.lean— is the same stringset as an SP_2 grammar. This is not an artefact of the toy alphabet: every AGREE language is SP_2 (Subregular.TSLGrammar.agree_lang_eq_sp), because equality is transitive, so constraining tier-adjacent pairs already constrains pairs at arbitrary distance. - Opaque harmony: they come apart. A blocking pattern is TSL_2 but SP at no width, since deleting the blocker leaves an illegal word and SP languages are subsequence-closed.
The blocking alphabet BSeg is schematic — one blocker, one transparent segment, and
the two harmonizing series — and stands in for no particular language. Opaque
consonant-harmony systems are rare; [Han10] surveys the attested cases and none
is formalised here.
Transparent harmony: Navajo is SP_2 as well as TSL_2 #
[Han10]'s minimal pair under the SP_2 description: the pre-harmony /si-dʒéːʔ/ is rejected and the surface [ʃidʒéːʔ] accepted. Both transfer along the equality of languages rather than being recomputed.
Opaque harmony: blocking is strictly piecewise at no width #
A schematic alphabet for an opaque long-distance pattern: the two harmonizing series, a blocker, and transparent material.
- ant : BSeg
Anterior member of the harmonizing series.
- post : BSeg
Posterior member of the harmonizing series.
- blocker : BSeg
The blocker: it projects onto the tier, so it interrupts the harmony.
- transparent : BSeg
Transparent material: off-tier, hence invisible to the constraint.
Instances For
Equations
- McMullin2016.instDecidableEqBSeg x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Everything but the transparent segment projects. A blocker is a segment that the tier keeps — that is the whole of its opacity.
Equations
- s.onTier = (s ≠ McMullin2016.BSeg.transparent)
Instances For
The forbidden tier-adjacent pairs: the two series may not be tier-adjacent.
Equations
- McMullin2016.BSeg.ant.Mixed McMullin2016.BSeg.post = True
- McMullin2016.BSeg.post.Mixed McMullin2016.BSeg.ant = True
- x✝¹.Mixed x✝ = False
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The schematic blocking language: harmony across transparent material, halted by a blocker.
Equations
Instances For
Transparent material does not license a mixed pair: it is deleted by the projection, leaving the two series tier-adjacent.
A blocker does license it: the blocker projects, so the two series are no longer tier-adjacent.
Deleting the blocker leaves an illegal word — the configuration no subsequence grammar can distinguish.
Blocking is not strictly piecewise, at any width ([McM16]). SP languages are subsequence-closed, so a legal word whose blocker-deletion is illegal rules out every SP grammar at once.
The tier buys expressive power ([McM16]): some TSL_2 language is
strictly piecewise at no width. With navajoSibilantHarmony_lang_isSP2 — where the two
descriptions do coincide — this is the thesis's typological argument in miniature: SP
suffices for transparency, and only for transparency.