Lassiter and Goodman (2017): Adjectival Vagueness in a Bayesian Model of Interpretation #
This file formalizes the free-variable Rational Speech Act model of [LG17] on
the RSA kernel pipeline. A positive-form gradable adjective compares a degree with a threshold
the semantics leaves open (sem); the pragmatic listener resolves the threshold jointly with
the state, threading each candidate assignment through a threshold-indexed literal listener and
speaker (L0, S1) and inverting the family against the product of the degree prior and the
threshold prior (L1). The threshold marginal of that posterior gives the metalinguistic
probability that an individual counts as tall, the posterior mass of thresholds below the
individual's height (metalinguistic), and borderline cases are those of intermediate
metalinguistic probability.
The sorites dissolves as in Edgington. Read materially, the inductive premises fail exactly
when the threshold falls in the gap between adjacent members, and the gap masses sum to the
mass of the whole range (sum_gapMass), so each can be small while their sum is near one;
Adams's theorem bounds the uncertainty of the conclusion of a valid argument by the summed
uncertainty of its premises (adams), and the sorites is valid (sorites_uncertainty).
Read by Adams's Thesis, each premise is a conditional probability of the threshold marginal
and is at most the material premise (conditionalPremise_le).
Implementation notes #
Degrees form a finite linear order so that the discrete pipeline applies; the paper's continuous scale and normal prior enter only through its simulations, which are not stated. The assignment of the paper's eq. 27 is the pair of thresholds for the adjective and its antonym, and the threshold prior is a parameter rather than the paper's uniform prior, which the model never uses beyond its being a prior.
TODO #
The free-variable reading of the inductive premise (the paper's eq. 44), the antonym symmetry of the simulations, and the scalar-implicature warm-up of §3 are not stated.
References #
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.instDecidableEqUtterance x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The meaning of an utterance at a degree under an assignment of thresholds to the adjective and its antonym (eqs. 22–23): tall holds above the first threshold, short below the second, and silence everywhere.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.sem θ LassiterGoodman2017.Utterance.tall = Set.Ioi θ.1
- LassiterGoodman2017.sem θ LassiterGoodman2017.Utterance.short = Set.Iio θ.2
- LassiterGoodman2017.sem θ LassiterGoodman2017.Utterance.silent = Set.univ
Instances For
The literal listener at an assignment (eq. 27): the degree prior conditioned on the truth of the utterance.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.L0 μ θ = RSA.literalListener μ fun (u : LassiterGoodman2017.Utterance) => (LassiterGoodman2017.sem θ u).indicator 1
Instances For
The speaker at an assignment (eq. 28): the family speaker over degrees and assignments at
rationality α with cost factors cost.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.S1 μ α cost = RSA.familySpeaker (LassiterGoodman2017.L0 μ) α cost
Instances For
The pragmatic listener (eq. 29): the family listener against the product of the degree prior and the threshold prior. Its first marginal is the degree posterior (eq. 31), its second the posterior over assignments (eq. 30).
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.L1 μ ν α cost = RSA.familyListener (LassiterGoodman2017.L0 μ) α cost (μ.prod ν)
Instances For
The speaker produces an utterance at a degree and assignment exactly when it is true there and the degree has positive prior.
An utterance true at a degree of positive prior under an assignment of positive prior has a positive marginal.
Truthfulness: the pragmatic listener puts positive mass on a degree and assignment exactly when both have positive prior and the utterance is true at the degree under the assignment.
The posterior over the adjective's threshold (eq. 30): the marginal of the listener on the first coordinate of the assignment.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.thresholdPosterior μ ν α cost u = ((LassiterGoodman2017.L1 μ ν α cost) u).snd.fst
Instances For
The metalinguistic probability that a degree counts as tall under a threshold measure (eq. 32): the mass of thresholds below it.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.metalinguistic ρ d = ρ (Set.Iio d)
Instances For
The metalinguistic probability marginalizes the joint posterior over the degree and the antonym's threshold.
A borderline case: a degree of intermediate metalinguistic probability.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.Borderline ρ d = (0 < LassiterGoodman2017.metalinguistic ρ d ∧ LassiterGoodman2017.metalinguistic ρ d < 1)
Instances For
The sorites #
The failure probability of a material inductive premise (eq. 37): the threshold falls between two adjacent members.
Equations
- LassiterGoodman2017.gapMass ρ a b = ρ (Set.Ico a b)
Instances For
Along a monotone sequence the gap masses sum to the mass of the whole range.
Adams's theorem: the uncertainty of the conclusion of a valid argument is at most the summed uncertainty of its premises.
The material sorites is valid: if the top member is tall and no gap holds the threshold, the bottom member is tall.
The uncertainty of the sorites conclusion is bounded by the uncertainty that the top member is tall plus the summed gap masses, which is the mass of the whole range.
Under Adams's Thesis (eq. 40) an inductive premise is the conditional probability that the lower member is tall given that the upper one is, which is at most the material premise, the probability that the threshold avoids the gap.