Landau (2015): A Two-Tiered Theory of Control #
MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-02885-1.
The TTC's own apparatus — the predicative/logophoric Tier, the eight
PredicateClasses, and their tier assignment — is defined here, mapped into
the neutral vocabulary by Tier.mechanism (Control.Mechanism); the
finiteness scale it consumes is Control.ClauseClass
(Syntax/Control/Head.lean). The file holds the book's empirical
engagement: the table (80) contrasts, the
de se/de te split in object control (table (36)), the derivation of
predicate classes from English Fragment verb entries, and the
consilience bridge to [Noo07]'s CTP classification.
Main results #
Table80Rowwith the two availability columns: the six empirical contrasts of table (80), a perfect split between the tiers (table80_complementary); the mechanism rows cite theirControl.IsSaturatingderivationsobjectControlReading: psychological → de se, communicative → de te (table (36))derivedLandauClass/derivedControlTier: predicate classes derived from Fragment verb fields rather than storedctpToControlTier/ctpToLandauClass: Noonan CTP classes mapped to the TTC, with the tier-consistency theorem
The two tiers #
The two tiers of obligatory control.
Predicative control (EC complements): selected by nonattitude predicates; PRO moves to Spec,Fin and control is syntactic predication; forces exhaustive control.
Logophoric control (PC complements): selected by attitude
predicates; C^OC projects a perspectival coordinate and control is
predication + variable binding; allows partial control and forces
an attitude-holder-bound reading — de se under subject and
psych-object control, de te under communicative object control
(table (36), objectControlReading).
- predicative : Tier
Predicative control: nonattitude, predication only
- logophoric : Tier
Logophoric control: attitude, predication + variable binding
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instDecidableEqTier x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Landau2015.instReprTier = { reprPrec := Landau2015.instReprTier.repr }
Equations
- Landau2015.instReprTier.repr Landau2015.Tier.predicative prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Landau2015.Tier.predicative")).group prec✝
- Landau2015.instReprTier.repr Landau2015.Tier.logophoric prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Landau2015.Tier.logophoric")).group prec✝
Instances For
Logophoric control corresponds to attitude complements.
Equations
Instances For
Each tier's dependency mechanism, in the neutral vocabulary
(Control.Mechanism): predication shares the referent; logophoric
control composes a binding leg over predication.
Equations
Instances For
Predicate classification #
The control predicate classes ([Lan00a]; (4a–d)/(5a–d)): classes (4a–d) select untensed complements (nonattitude → predicative control), classes (5a–d) tensed ones (attitude → logophoric control), [Lan04a]'s correlation. Membership is a property of predicate–complement pairs, not lexemes, and the evaluative class is the of-frame adjectives specifically ([Lan04a] for the class). [Pea16]'s rival cut is temporal, not attitudinal.
- implicative : PredicateClass
avoid, dare, manage, remember, … (nonattitude)
- aspectual : PredicateClass
begin, continue, finish, start, stop (nonattitude)
- modal : PredicateClass
have, is able, may, must, need, should (nonattitude)
- evaluative : PredicateClass
bold, crazy, kind, rude, silly, smart (nonattitude; of-frame adjectives)
- factive : PredicateClass
dislike, glad, hate, regret, sorry, … (attitude)
- propositional : PredicateClass
affirm, believe, claim, declare, say, think (attitude)
- desiderative : PredicateClass
agree, choose, decide, hope, intend, want, … (attitude)
- interrogative : PredicateClass
ask, guess, inquire, know, wonder (attitude)
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instDecidableEqPredicateClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instReprPredicateClass = { reprPrec := Landau2015.instReprPredicateClass.repr }
Map predicate class to control tier.
Equations
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.implicative.tier = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.aspectual.tier = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.modal.tier = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.evaluative.tier = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.factive.tier = Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.propositional.tier = Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.desiderative.tier = Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.PredicateClass.interrogative.tier = Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
Instances For
Table (80): empirical contrasts #
The six contrast rows of table (80) of [Lan15].
- inflectedComplement : Table80Row
OC into an inflected complement (the OC-NC generalization (70);
inflectedComplement_realizes_ocnc) - nonhumanPRO : Table80Row
[−human]PRO ((81): the logophoric binder is the AUTHOR/ADDRESSEE function, defined only for humans) - implicitControl : Table80Row
Implicit control ((90)/(93): predication needs an overt external argument)
- controlShift : Table80Row
Control shift (
Control.IsSaturating.eq_of_controllersblocks it under predication: the shifted reading assigns the saturated slot a different controller) - partialControl : Table80Row
Partial control (
Control.IsSaturating.not_hasPartialblocks it under predication) - splitControl : Table80Row
Split control (
Control.IsSaturating.not_hasSplitblocks it under predication)
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instDecidableEqTable80Row x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instReprTable80Row = { reprPrec := Landau2015.instReprTable80Row.repr }
Table (80)'s predicative column.
Equations
Instances For
Table (80)'s logophoric column.
Equations
Instances For
Table (80) is a perfect split: every contrast is available under exactly one tier.
The inflected-complement row is the OC-NC generalization ((70)),
derived from the calculus: [+Agr] leaves OC in [−T] complements
(the predicative tier) and destroys it in [+T] complements (the
logophoric tier), by the Feature Transmission asymmetry ((60):
predication is not contingent on feature matching — Icelandic quirky
constructions — while variable binding is, [Hei08],
[Kra09b]). Its empirical scope is contested ([Gan19]).
EC verbs resist impersonal passives ((98) in [Lan15]): a direct consequence of condition (90), since impersonal passives suppress the external argument that predicative control needs — the implicit-control row of table (80). Cross-linguistic evidence: Hebrew, German, Dutch, Russian.
De se / de te in object control (table (36)) #
The two logophoric readings of OC PRO under attitude predicates (table (36) of [Lan15]): which coordinate of the embedded context is projected depends on the object control verb subclass.
- deSe : DeSeReading
PRO = AUTHOR(i'): attitude holder's identification of self
- deTe : DeSeReading
PRO = ADDRESSEE(i'): attitude holder's identification of addressee
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instDecidableEqDeSeReading x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instReprDeSeReading = { reprPrec := Landau2015.instReprDeSeReading.repr }
Object control verb subclasses (table (36)).
- psychological : ObjectControlSubclass
Psychological verbs: convince, persuade, dissuade, tempt
- communicative : ObjectControlSubclass
Communicative verbs: tell, ask, urge, recommend
Instances For
Equations
- Landau2015.instDecidableEqObjectControlSubclass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Psychological verbs bind the AUTHOR coordinate (de se); communicative verbs bind the ADDRESSEE coordinate (de te).
Equations
Instances For
Derived Landau class from Verb #
Derive [Lan15]'s predicate class from Verb fields — a bridge
from Fragment verb entries to the TTC deriving the classification
from existing semantic fields rather than storing it independently.
Returns none when the classification cannot be determined from the
available fields (e.g., try has no implicative, attitude, or
cosType).
Mapping: cosType → aspectual; implicative/causative →
implicative; factivePresup → factive; question-embedding without
attitude → interrogative; doxastic → propositional; preferential →
desiderative.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Derive control tier from Verb fields: a control verb induces
logophoric control iff it selects an attitude complement (detected
via attitude, factivePresup, or takesQuestionBase); otherwise
predicative. Returns none for non-control verbs.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Per-verb verification #
"stop" (CoS cessation) → aspectual → predicative
"start" (CoS inception) → aspectual → predicative
"begin" (CoS inception) → aspectual → predicative
"continue" (CoS continuation) → aspectual → predicative
"manage" (positive implicative) → implicative → predicative
"fail" (negative implicative) → implicative → predicative
"remember" (positive implicative) → implicative → predicative
"forget" (negative implicative) → implicative → predicative
"force" (coercive causative) → implicative → predicative
"want" (preferential attitude) → desiderative → logophoric
"hope" (preferential attitude) → desiderative → logophoric
"promise" (preferential attitude) → desiderative → logophoric.
Previously unclassified; fixed by adding attitude to the
Fragment entry per [Lan15] (5c).
"persuade" (preferential attitude, object control) → desiderative → logophoric. Table (36) establishes persuade as logophoric object control; the desiderative label is this file's derivation from the Fragment's preferential-attitude field ((4)/(5) list no class for it).
"regret" (factive) → factive → logophoric
"know" (factive + question) → factive → logophoric
"believe" (doxastic attitude) → propositional → logophoric
"think" (doxastic attitude) → propositional → logophoric
"wonder" (question-embedding, non-attitude) → interrogative → logophoric
"try" has no cosType, implicative, causative, factivePresup,
takesQuestionBase, or attitude, so derivedLandauClass cannot
classify it. This is correct: "try" is not implicative (trying
doesn't entail succeeding) and not clearly attitudinal.
Noonan CTP → Landau tier bridge #
Map [Noo07]'s CTP classes to [Lan15]'s control tiers: modal/phasal/achievement/negative are nonattitude (predicative); utterance/propAttitude/commentative/knowledge/desiderative/ manipulative are attitude (logophoric); pretence is ambiguous and perception typically takes no controlled complement.
Equations
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.modal = some Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.phasal = some Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.achievement = some Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.negative = some Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.utterance = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.propAttitude = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.commentative = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.knowledge = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.desiderative = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.manipulative = some Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.pretence = none
- Landau2015.ctpToControlTier CTPClass.perception = none
Instances For
Map [Noo07]'s CTP classes to [Lan15]'s predicate classes (where the mapping is unambiguous).
Equations
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.modal = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.modal
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.phasal = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.aspectual
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.achievement = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.implicative
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.negative = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.implicative
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.commentative = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.factive
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.knowledge = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.factive
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.propAttitude = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.propositional
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.utterance = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.propositional
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.desiderative = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.desiderative
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.manipulative = some Landau2015.PredicateClass.desiderative
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.pretence = none
- Landau2015.ctpToLandauClass CTPClass.perception = none
Instances For
When both mappings are defined, they agree on the control tier.
[Noo07]'s equi-deletion criterion (§2.1) and [Lan15]'s
control tiers classify the same English verbs by independent
properties; the bridge theorem makes the consilience kernel-checked,
witnessed by manage.
Cross-paper consilience: Noonan-equi on the achievement class coincides with Landau's predicative tier.
Chierchia (1984) comparison #
The TTC engages [Chi84]'s property theory as its major predecessor; the two cut the control verb space differently:
- Chierchia: ALL verbs with the CP are obligatory control, regardless of attitude status. The CP is a meaning postulate that applies uniformly. The subject/object and attitude/non-attitude distinctions are orthogonal.
- Landau: attitude verbs (want, hope, promise, persuade) are logophoric (perspectival coordinate needed), non-attitude verbs (try, manage, force) are predicative.
The systematic divergence: Chierchia → obligatory → predicative for ALL control verbs, while Landau → logophoric for attitude verbs. The theories agree on non-attitude verbs (both predicative) and diverge precisely on attitude verbs.
Map Chierchia's control classes to Landau's control tiers.
Equations
- Landau2015.chierchiaToLandauTier Chierchia1984.ChierchiaControlClass.obligatory = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.chierchiaToLandauTier Chierchia1984.ChierchiaControlClass.semiObligatory = Landau2015.Tier.predicative
- Landau2015.chierchiaToLandauTier Chierchia1984.ChierchiaControlClass.prominence = Landau2015.Tier.logophoric
Instances For
The CP/no-CP distinction aligns with the predicative/logophoric distinction: CP-bearing classes are predicative, CP-lacking classes are logophoric. Chierchia's CP is thereby the semantic reflex of Landau's condition (90): the entailment needs a specific overt argument to serve as controller, which is what predication demands.
Non-attitude verbs: Chierchia and Landau agree #
For verbs without an attitude builder (try, manage, begin, stop, force, fail), both systems classify them as predicative control.
Attitude verbs: systematic divergence #
For verbs with an attitude builder (want, hope, promise, persuade), the two systems diverge: Chierchia classifies them as obligatory (→ predicative), while Landau classifies them as logophoric.
This is a genuine theoretical disagreement: Chierchia groups by entailment structure (all verbs with the CP are treated uniformly), Landau groups by attitude status (attitude verbs introduce a perspectival coordinate that changes the control mechanism).