Documentation

Linglib.Studies.KursatDegen2021

[KD21] #

[DHG+20] [WD21]

Perceptual difficulty differences predict asymmetry in redundant modification with color and material adjectives. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 6(1): 676-688, 2021.

Core Argument #

Material adjectives are harder to perceive than color adjectives (Exps 1, 3), and color adjectives are used redundantly more often than material adjectives (Exp 2). This anti-correlation between perceptual difficulty and redundant-use rate supports a noise-based RSA account ([WD21]) where the noise parameter reflects perceptual difficulty of property verification.

Experiments #

Verified Data #

All regression coefficients verified against paper text (§2.3, §3.3, §4.3).

Noise-Model Connection #

The cs-RSA model ([DHG+20]) explains redundant modification via noisy perception: features with higher perceptual discrimination contribute more signal to the literal listener. This paper grounds the asymmetry perceptually — material is harder to verify than color (Exps 1, 3), and color is used redundantly more (Exp 2) — establishing the ordering (color easier than material), not specific channel parameters. The full S1 redundancy prediction requires the incremental model of [WD21] (re-exported below).

A regression result from one of the paper's mixed-effects models. Sign convention varies by experiment: in Exps 1/3, positive β means material > color (harder); in Exp 2, positive β means color > material (more redundant). See individual def docstrings for interpretation.

  • beta :

    Fixed-effect coefficient

  • se :

    Standard error

  • tStat : Option

    t-statistic (when reported)

  • significant : Bool

    All reported effects are p < .0001

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Material → higher error rates (§2.3: β = 0.48, SE = 0.12, p < .0001). Log odds of incorrect response.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Material → slower RTs (§2.3: β = 5.44, SE = 4.74, t = 11.49, p < .0001). RT difference in ms (material − color). NOTE: The paper's SE and t are inconsistent (5.44/4.74 ≈ 1.15 ≠ 11.49); likely SE = 0.474 (giving 5.44/0.474 ≈ 11.48). Values as printed.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Color used redundantly more than material (§3.3: β = 2.32, SE = 0.64, p < .0001). Log odds of including the redundant modifier.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The strong version of the perceptual difficulty hypothesis — within-property-type difficulty predicts item-level redundancy — is not supported (§3.3: insufficient speakers for material items).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Material → higher error rates in context (§4.3: β = 0.96, SE = 0.09, p < .0001).

              Equations
              Instances For

                Material → slower RTs in context (§4.3: β = 0.24, SE = 0.018, t = −59.62, p < .0001). Log-transformed RT.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Material is harder to perceive than color: both error and RT effects are significant in Exp 1 (isolated properties) and Exp 3 (in context).

                  All difficulty effects have positive β: material produces more errors and slower RTs than color.

                  Color is used redundantly more than material: positive β in Exp 2.

                  The core finding: perceptual difficulty and redundant use are anti-correlated across property types. Material is harder to perceive (positive β in Exps 1, 3) AND less redundantly used (positive β in Exp 2 means color > material). All effects significant.

                  The full redundancy prediction requires the incremental CI-RSA model ([WD21]), which processes utterances word-by-word. The incremental model's three predictions are verified as theorems in WaldonDegen2021.lean — here we re-export the key result showing that redundant color > redundant size in English, which is the color/size analogue of the color/material asymmetry tested in Exp 2.

                  theorem KursatDegen2021.incremental_model_predicts_color_asymmetry :

                  The CI-RSA incremental model predicts English speakers use redundant color more than redundant size (Waldon & Degen 2021, Prediction 1). This is the color/size version of the color/material asymmetry observed in Exp 2. Stated as the chain-rule trajectory comparison on the exact-ℚ speaker face.