Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Kratzer2012Informational

Informational Backgrounds — [Kra12] §2.3d #

Epistemic modals with an informational (potentially non-realistic) modal base.

A weather report provides evidence for rain, but the report can be wrong: the proposition "the report says rain" does not guarantee rain is actual. This makes the informational background non-realistic — the actual world may not be in ∩f(w) if the report is wrong at that world.

WorldRainingReportSaysRainNotes
w0yesyesReport correct
w1yesnoRain, report missed
w2noyesDry, report wrong
w3nonoBoth correct

Reference: Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and Conditionals. OUP. Ch. 2 §2.3d.

@[reducible, inline]
Equations
Instances For

    Propositions #

    Conversational backgrounds #

    Informational modal base: accessible worlds are those where the report says rain. Accessible = {w0, w2}.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Reliability assumption: if the report says rain, it's raining. This is a conditional proposition (report → rain).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Derivation theorems #

        Report alone doesn't entail rain. The informational base gives accessible worlds {w0, w2}, and raining is false at w2.

        Report + reliability entails rain. The strong base gives accessible worlds {w0}, and raining is true at w0.

        The informational base is not realistic. At w1 (it rains but the report doesn't say so), w1 ∉ ∩f(w1) because reportSaysRain w1 = false.

        The strong epistemic base is also not realistic. At w1, the report doesn't say rain, so w1 fails the reportSaysRain proposition.

        Possibility holds under report alone. Even without reliability, rain is possible (w0 is accessible and raining).

        Evidence type bridge #