Tangale sandhi as a probe for syntactic structure #
Formalises [kenstowicz-1987]: the blockage of phrasal phonological rules can reveal surface syntax "that we did not already know". Tangale elision and tonal delinking apply obligatorily between a verb and its object (15b, e) but block before a wh-object (15c, f). A [wh]-sensitive sandhi rule is rejected both on interface-theoretic grounds and by the minimal pair (16): wh-possessors inside NP trigger elision (ayab noŋ 'whose banana'). The solution: wh-subjects obligatorily postpose to a position with "the force of the English cleft" (18) — the Focus position — and apparently in-situ wh-objects occupy it string-vacuously, so a constituent boundary blocks sandhi. Elision tracks government exactly once the Focus position is admitted; the [wh] feature does not factor it.
Equations
- Kenstowicz1987.instDecidableEqJuncture x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Kenstowicz1987.instReprJuncture = { reprPrec := Kenstowicz1987.instReprJuncture.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Observed: elision (and delinking) applies at the juncture ((4a, b), (5a–c), (15c, f), (16a, b)).
Equations
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.headComplementNP = true
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbObject = true
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbAdjunct = false
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.subjectVP = false
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbWhObject = false
- Kenstowicz1987.elides Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.headWhPossessor = true
Instances For
Whether the juncture's second element is a wh-word.
Equations
Instances For
The juncture is a government configuration under the Focus-position analysis: head–complement and verb–object are; adjuncts and subjects are not; a wh-object sits in the postverbal Focus position across a constituent boundary (string-vacuous postposing, as with the obligatorily postposed wh-subjects of (18)); a wh-possessor has no NP-internal Focus position and stays in situ.
Equations
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.headComplementNP = true
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbObject = true
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbAdjunct = false
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.subjectVP = false
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.verbWhObject = false
- Kenstowicz1987.governed Kenstowicz1987.Juncture.headWhPossessor = true
Instances For
The rejected account: elision does not factor through the [wh] feature of the second word — wh-objects block it while wh-possessors trigger it ((15c, f) vs (16a, b)).
His solution: elision tracks government exactly, once apparently in-situ wh-objects are placed in the postverbal Focus position. The blockage is a syntactic discovery made by phonology.
(15d–f): before a wh-object the verb surfaces in the blocked (faithful) form (dobgo noŋ), before a plain object in the elided–repaired form (dobug Malay) — audibly distinct by [Kid85]'s cascade.