Documentation

Linglib.Studies.JansenPollmann2001

[JP01]: On Round Numbers #

[JP01] [Sig88] [Kri07a] [WWL+23]

[JP01] operationalize roundness as relative suitability for approximation contexts (frequency after Dutch ongeveer 'about') and find it carried by four numerical properties — 10-ness, 2-ness, 5-ness, and (following [Sig88]) 2½-ness: membership in [k × (1–9 × 10ⁿ)] (their p. 198). Their explanation (pp. 200–201) is the principle of favourite quantities: doubling and halving (sometimes followed by halving again) are the basic means of manipulating quantities, so the round-number unit inventory is the orbit of the decimal base powers under these operations — exactly the four k-families (favUnit_iff), and provably not the 3-family (not_favUnit_three_mul_pow; their p. 199: 3-, 4-, 6-, 7-ness contribute nothing).

Two-number approximative expressions (about 5 or 6 books) obey the revised sequence rule (their p. 197): the pair consists of consecutive members of an arithmetic sequence whose ratio and first member are 1×10ⁿ, 2×10ⁿ, or ½×10ⁿ. Quarters, which do round single numbers (2½-ness), are absent from pairs (quarter_unit_not_seqRatio).

Their p. 198 definition allows the zeroth power (hasKnessOrig); Roundness.HasKness follows [WWL+23]'s b ≥ 1 restriction (their fn. 3). The divergence matters downstream: under the original, 15 has 5-ness (fifteen_has_orig_fiveness) — roundness that the restricted variant, and hence Precision.inferPrecisionMode, misses at 15, 45, …. Reading this paper also corrected Roundness's 10-ness: it is the k = 1 family (divisors 10, 100, …) — their own example "70 has only 10-ness" — not the k = 10 family.

Their regression (frequency from magnitude n⁻¹, n⁻² plus the four properties, R² = 0.968, p. 200) stays prose per the no-regression-theorems rule, as does the FA operationalization itself.

Main definitions #

Main results #

The principle of favourite quantities (their pp. 200–201) #

The basic quantity-manipulation operations: "doubling and halving (sometimes followed by halving again)".

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A favourite unit: a decimal base power manipulated by one quantity operation.

      Equations
      Instances For
        theorem JansenPollmann2001.favUnit_iff (q : ) :
        IsFavUnit q ∃ (n : ), q = 10 ^ n q = 2 * 10 ^ n q = 10 ^ n / 2 q = 10 ^ n / 4

        The favourite units are exactly the four k-ness families: powers of ten, their doubles, their halves, and their quarters.

        theorem JansenPollmann2001.half_pow (n : ) :
        10 ^ (n + 1) / 2 = 5 * 10 ^ n

        Halving a base power lands on the 5-family.

        theorem JansenPollmann2001.halfAgain_pow (n : ) :
        10 ^ (n + 1) / 4 = 5 / 2 * 10 ^ n

        Halving twice lands on the 2½-family.

        No quantity operation reaches the 3-family: the structural reason the roundness inventory has exactly four properties (their p. 199: 3-, 4-, 6-, 7-ness contribute nothing to frequency).

        The revised sequence rule (their pp. 196–197) #

        Two-number approximative expressions ([about 5 or 6 books]) consist of consecutive members of an arithmetic sequence whose ratio equals its first member and is 1×10ⁿ, 2×10ⁿ, or ½×10ⁿ (in ℕ, the half-family is 5×10ⁿ). The original rule also allowed ¼×10ⁿ; the revision drops it (quarter-ratio pairs are under 0.5% in all four corpora).

        A ratio licensed by the revised sequence rule.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The revised sequence rule: [a, b] are consecutive members of the sequence r, 2r, 3r, … for a licensed ratio r.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Quarters split single-number roundness from pair formation: 25 is a favourite unit (twice-halved 10², whence 2½-ness) but not a licensed sequence ratio — their pp. 197, 199–200 asymmetry.

            The original k-ness and the b ≥ 1 restriction (their p. 198) #

            Their original k-ness: n ∈ [k × (1–9 × 10ᵇ)] with b ≥ 0 — 10-ness is k = 1. Roundness.HasKness is this with [WWL+23]'s b ≥ 1 restriction. Search bounded as there.

            Equations
            Instances For

              The restricted variant entails the original.

              The divergence that matters downstream: under the original definition 15 has 5-ness (15 = 3 × 5 × 10⁰), which the b ≥ 1 variant drops — the source of the 15/45-idealization noted at Precision.inferPrecisionMode.

              10-ness as expression shape ([Hur75]) #

              10-ness is two-word expressibility: n has 10-ness iff it is the value of a digit×base PHRASE — [Hur75]'s [NUMBER M] with a digit NUMBER and a pure ten-power M (forty, four hundred, …). The favourite-quantity properties are facts about numeral expression shape.