Gasparri (2025): Bare Singular Names and Genericity #
Journal of Semantics 42(1–2): 127–135.
Predicativists treat bare singular names (BSNs) like Ruth as predicative
DPs: ⟦∅ Ruth⟧ = ⟦the⟧ [λx. x is called Ruth]. If names are count nouns,
BSNs should pattern with definite singulars like the tiger for
genericity. The rows in Data/Examples/Gasparri2025.json show BSNs CAN
get generic readings, but exhibit generic recalcitrance — they are
harder to read generically than ordinary definite singulars, and need a
licensor (naming-convention context, Q-adverb, locative) to recover.
Main declarations #
genericOf— judgment of a row's generic readinggeneric_recalcitrance— unlicensed BSNs resist generics; unlicensed definite singulars do notlicensing_enables_generic— naming-convention contexts license BSN genericsquotation_rescues_kind_level— kind-level predicates reject BSNs but accept quoted names and definite commons
Judgment of the row's generic reading, if recorded.
Equations
- Gasparri2025.genericOf row = Option.map (fun (x : String × Features.Judgment) => x.snd) (List.find? (fun (x : String × Features.Judgment) => x.fst == "generic") row.readings)
Instances For
Generic recalcitrance: without a licensor, no bare singular name has an acceptable generic reading, while every definite common NP does. This is the asymmetry predicativism leaves unexplained: if Ruth is just ⟦the⟧ + a predicate, it should pattern with the tiger.
Naming-convention contexts license generic readings of BSNs: recalcitrance is not a categorical ban.
Kind-level predicates (extinct) accept definite commons and quoted names but not bare names: quotation rescues the kind-level parallel.