Franke 2011: Quantity implicatures and rational conversation #
[Fra11], S&P 4(1): IBR (iterated best response) converges to exhaustive interpretation (exhMW; the paper writes ExhMM).
The IBR machinery (IBR.lean, ScalarGames.lean, Convergence.lean,
RSABridge.lean) lives in this paper's directory over the shared
InterpGame carrier. This file contains the exhaustification facts and
worked examples:
- Facts 1, 3, 4 connecting IBR to the exhaustification literature
- Alternative counting (eq. (107)) and the R₁ characterization
- Concrete examples (scalar implicature, free choice disjunction)
Number of alternatives (messages) true at state s. This is |R⁻¹₀(s)| in Franke's notation.
Equations
- Franke2011.alternativeCount G s = (G.trueMessages s).card
Instances For
A state s is minimal among m-worlds if no m-world has fewer true alternatives. This characterizes R₁(m) per equation (107).
Equations
- Franke2011.isMinimalByAltCount G m s = (G.meaning m s ∧ ∀ (s' : T), G.meaning m s' → Franke2011.alternativeCount G s ≤ Franke2011.alternativeCount G s')
Instances For
Franke Fact 1 (containment direction): Level-1 receiver interpretation is contained in minimal-models exhaustification.
R₁(mₛ) ⊆ ExhMM(S)
Proof idea: If s is selected by R₁ (minimum alternative count), then s is minimal with respect to <_ALT because:
- s' <_ALT s means s' makes strictly fewer alternatives true
- But R₁ already selected for minimum alternative count
- So no such s' can exist among m-worlds
This is the containment direction; equality requires "homogeneity".
Conditions for the converse (ExhMW ⊆ R₁) #
The alternative ordering is total on m-worlds if for any two states where m is true, one's true alternatives are a subset of the other's.
Equations
- Franke2011.altOrderingTotalOnMessage G m = ∀ (s s' : T), G.meaning m s → G.meaning m s' → G.trueMessages s ⊆ G.trueMessages s' ∨ G.trueMessages s' ⊆ G.trueMessages s
Instances For
Converse direction under totality: ExhMW ⊆ R₁.
When <_ALT is total on m-worlds, minimal in the subset ordering implies minimum cardinality.
R₁ = ExhMW under totality: Full equivalence when alternatives form a chain.
Totality is a sufficient condition for [Fra11]'s Fact 1 to become an equality; the paper's own sufficient condition is "homogeneity" of the alternative set.
Franke Fact 3 (Appendix A): ExhMW(S, Alt) ⊆ ExhIE(S, Alt)
This is already proved as exhMW_entails_exhIE in
Exhaustification/Operators/Basic.lean.
Franke Fact 4 (Appendix A): ExhMW = ExhIE when Alt is closed under ∧.
This is proved as exhMW_eq_exhIE_of_closedUnderConj in
Exhaustification/Operators/Basic.lean.
Scalar Implicature Example (Franke Section 3.1) #
The classic "some" vs "all" example:
- States: {some-not-all, all}
- Messages: {some, all}
- Meaning: some true at both; all true only at all
IBR derivation:
- L₀: "some" → uniform over both states
- S₁ at "all": says "all" (more informative)
- S₁ at "some-not-all": says "some" (only option)
- L₂: "some" → "some-not-all" (scalar implicature!)
Equations
- Franke2011.instDecidableEqScalarState x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- Franke2011.instReprScalarState = { reprPrec := Franke2011.instReprScalarState.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Franke2011.instDecidableEqScalarMessage x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Franke2011.instReprScalarMessage = { reprPrec := Franke2011.instReprScalarMessage.repr }
Scalar implicature interpretation game
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The scalar implicature game IS a scalar game: truth sets are nested.
The scalar implicature game has distinct truth sets.
Free Choice Disjunction (Franke Section 3.3) #
"You may have cake or ice cream" → You may have either one.
States: {only-A, only-B, either, both} Messages: {◇A, ◇B, ◇(A∨B), ◇(A∧B)}
The free choice inference emerges from IBR reasoning because:
- At "either" state, speaker uses ◇(A∨B) (most informative true message)
- L₂ infers "either" from ◇(A∨B) (scalar implicature pattern)
Equations
- Franke2011.instDecidableEqFCState x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Franke2011.instFintypeFCState = { elems := { val := ↑Franke2011.FCState.enumList, nodup := Franke2011.FCState.enumList_nodup }, complete := Franke2011.instFintypeFCState._proof_1 }
Equations
- Franke2011.instReprFCState = { reprPrec := Franke2011.instReprFCState.repr }
Equations
- Franke2011.instReprFCState.repr Franke2011.FCState.onlyA prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCState.onlyA")).group prec✝
- Franke2011.instReprFCState.repr Franke2011.FCState.onlyB prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCState.onlyB")).group prec✝
- Franke2011.instReprFCState.repr Franke2011.FCState.either prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCState.either")).group prec✝
- Franke2011.instReprFCState.repr Franke2011.FCState.both prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCState.both")).group prec✝
Instances For
Equations
- Franke2011.instDecidableEqFCMessage x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Franke2011.instFintypeFCMessage = { elems := { val := ↑Franke2011.FCMessage.enumList, nodup := Franke2011.FCMessage.enumList_nodup }, complete := Franke2011.instFintypeFCMessage._proof_1 }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Franke2011.instReprFCMessage.repr Franke2011.FCMessage.mayA prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCMessage.mayA")).group prec✝
- Franke2011.instReprFCMessage.repr Franke2011.FCMessage.mayB prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Franke2011.FCMessage.mayB")).group prec✝
Instances For
Equations
- Franke2011.instReprFCMessage = { reprPrec := Franke2011.instReprFCMessage.repr }
Free choice interpretation game
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.