Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Dendikken1995ParticleVerbs

Particle verb constructions — small-clause analysis #

[dD95] [Bak88]

[dD95] analyses verbal particles as ergative small-clause heads. The book's primary focus is complex particle constructions (make John out a liar, ch. 2), with applications to triadic constructions and Dative Shift (ch. 3-4) and to applicatives and transitive causatives (ch. 5). All four phenomena instantiate a SC-in-SC structural template [VP V [SC1 Spec [XP Prt [SC2 NP {AP/NP/PP/VP}]]]] (book p. 269).

This file formalises only the simplex case (John looked up the information) of ch. 2.4, and only the surface SC after NP-movement to SpecSC. It does not capture:

Main declarations #

Particle verb inventory #

A particle verb entry: verb + particle + gloss.

  • verb : String
  • particle : String
  • meaning : String
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      def Dendikken1995ParticleVerbs.instDecidableEqParticleVerb.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : ParticleVerb) :
      Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For
          Equations
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For
              Equations
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Simplex PVC: surface SC after NP-movement #

                    For a simplex PVC John looked the information up (the V-NP-Prt order), the surface structure has the DP raised to SpecSC and the particle as the SC head. Note this is the output of NP-movement — den Dikken's D-structure has the DP as the complement of the (ergative) particle, with SpecSC empty. The current SmallClause shape forces a subject field, so we record the post-movement form.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      All PVC small clauses have predicate category P.

                      Connection to canonical SC shape #

                      The two trivial unfolding theorems above are convenience aliases. The load-bearing structural fact about pvToSmallClause is its tree shape once converted to a SyntacticObject via SmallClause.toSO — a 2-leaf binary tree (subject + predicate). This is the shape consumed by any file that wants to compose PVC SCs into larger structures (e.g. embedUnderV for the full [VP V [SC DP Prt]] analysis, as used by HaddicanEtAl2026.pvc_sc). Stated as a leaf count over the noncomputable Merge node (SO.leafCount_merge) so downstream files can rewrite without unfolding pvToSmallClause.

                      Any PVC small clause is a 2-leaf binary tree (subject + predicate).

                      The predCat field of pvToSmallClause agrees with the predicate.headCat reading — the well-formedness invariant consumed by SmallClause.toSO_isSmallClause. The mkLeafPhon-built predicate is a leaf, so the computable outerCatC head category reduces definitionally to its stored predCat.

                      The PVC small clause satisfies IsSmallClause — the companion predicate over raw SyntacticObjects. Discharges via the well-formedness invariant + the SC-side round-trip lemma.