Documentation

Linglib.Studies.DechaineWiltschko2002

Déchaine & Wiltschko 2002: Decomposing Pronouns #

[DW02]

"The notion 'pronoun' is not a primitive of linguistic theory." Pronouns decompose into three categories by internal constituent sizeproDPprophiPproNP — and that size determines distribution, semantics, and binding-theoretic status ([DW02] table (24)):

categoryinternal syntaxdistributionsemanticsbinding
pro-DPD; morph. complexargumentdefiniteR-expression (Cond C)
pro-φPneither D nor Narg or predvariable (Cond B)
pro-NPNpredicateconstant— (inherent semantics)

This categorial axis cross-cuts Cardinaletti & Starke's deficiency hierarchy (Pronoun.Strength, [CS99a]): see strength_category_independent. It is the structural rival to the deficiency view that Pronoun.Strength's docstring flags as orthogonal.

Main declarations #

Implementation notes #

The φP layer is the locus of the person/number/gender φ-features modelled in UD.Person etc.; hasPhiLayer marks which categories project it. A full federation of the φ-internal geometry to UD.Person is left to follow-up.

[DW02]'s three pronoun categories, by internal constituent size: a full DP ([DP D [φP φ [NP N]]]), a φP ([φP φ [NP N]]), or a bare NP ([NP N]).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Whether the category projects a D layer (definiteness / R-expression locus).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Whether the category projects a φP layer — the locus of the person/number/ gender φ-features (cf. UD.Person). A bare proNP has none.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Binding-theoretic status ([DW02] table (24)).

          • rExpression : BindingStatus

            Subject to Condition C (a referring expression).

          • boundVariable : BindingStatus

            Subject to Condition B (can be a bound variable).

          • unconstrained : BindingStatus

            Undefined for binding theory; behaviour follows from inherent semantics.

          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              External distribution ([DW02] (24)–(25)).

              Instances For
                @[implicit_reducible]
                Equations
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Inherent semantics ([DW02] (24)).

                  • definite : Sem
                  • const : Sem
                  • underspecified : Sem
                  Instances For
                    @[implicit_reducible]
                    Equations
                    def DechaineWiltschko2002.instReprSem.repr :
                    SemStd.Format
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      D&W's central thesis: binding status is determined by size. A D layer makes the proform an R-expression (Condition C); a φP top (φ-features but no D) makes it a bound variable (Condition B); a bare NP is unconstrained by binding theory. Derived from hasDLayer/hasPhiLayer, not stipulated.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        The size → binding-status entailment #

                        A proform is an R-expression (Condition C) iff it has a D layer.

                        A proform is a bound variable (Condition B) iff it has φ-features but no D.

                        Case studies ([DW02] table (24)) #

                        Each language's independent/personal proform instantiates a different category: Halkomelem independent pronouns = pro-DP (R-expressions, Condition C); Shuswap independent pronouns = pro-φP (bound variables, Condition B); Japanese kare = pro-NP (a constant, binding-unconstrained).

                        Orthogonality to Cardinaletti & Starke deficiency #

                        [DW02] §3.2 analyses English personal pronouns as pro-DP (1st/2nd person — they can be determiners: we/us linguists) and pro-φP (3rd person — *they linguists), and one as pro-NP. Cross-classifying those categories with [CS99a] deficiency (Pronoun.Strength: full we/they are strong, enclitic 'em is a clitic) shows the two axes are independent — neither determines the other.

                        A pronoun cross-classified on both axes: D&W Category × C&S Strength.

                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            English inventory ([DW02] §3), each form tagged with its D&W category and its C&S strength.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Strength does not determine Category: we and they are both strong, yet we is pro-DP (1st person) and they is pro-φP (3rd person).

                              Category does not determine Strength: they and 'em are both pro-φP (3rd person), yet they is strong and 'em is a clitic.

                              theorem DechaineWiltschko2002.strength_category_independent :
                              (∃ (p : Datum) (q : Datum), p.strength = q.strength p.category q.category) ∃ (p : Datum) (q : Datum), p.category = q.category p.strength q.strength

                              The Déchaine-Wiltschko categorial axis and the Cardinaletti-Starke deficiency axis are functionally independent — neither is a function of the other. This is the theorem behind Pronoun.Strength's docstring claim of orthogonality.