Déchaine & Wiltschko 2002: Decomposing Pronouns #
"The notion 'pronoun' is not a primitive of linguistic theory." Pronouns
decompose into three categories by internal constituent size —
proDP ⊃ prophiP ⊃ proNP — and that size determines distribution, semantics,
and binding-theoretic status ([DW02] table (24)):
| category | internal syntax | distribution | semantics | binding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pro-DP | D; morph. complex | argument | definite | R-expression (Cond C) |
| pro-φP | neither D nor N | arg or pred | — | variable (Cond B) |
| pro-NP | N | predicate | constant | — (inherent semantics) |
This categorial axis cross-cuts Cardinaletti & Starke's deficiency
hierarchy (Pronoun.Strength, [CS99a]): see
strength_category_independent. It is the structural rival to the deficiency
view that Pronoun.Strength's docstring flags as orthogonal.
Main declarations #
Category— pro-DP / pro-φP / pro-NP, withhasDLayer/hasPhiLayerrecording size.Category.bindingStatus— derived from size, not stipulated: D&W's claim that the D layer yields a Condition-C R-expression, a φP-top yields a Condition-B variable, and a bare NP is binding-unconstrained.strength_category_independent— the C&SStrengthand D&WCategoryaxes are functionally independent (neither determines the other), with English witnesses from [DW02] §3.2.
Implementation notes #
The φP layer is the locus of the person/number/gender φ-features modelled in
UD.Person etc.; hasPhiLayer marks which categories project it. A full
federation of the φ-internal geometry to UD.Person is left to follow-up.
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instDecidableEqCategory x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Whether the category projects a D layer (definiteness / R-expression locus).
Equations
Instances For
Binding-theoretic status ([DW02] table (24)).
- rExpression : BindingStatus
Subject to Condition C (a referring expression).
- boundVariable : BindingStatus
Subject to Condition B (can be a bound variable).
- unconstrained : BindingStatus
Undefined for binding theory; behaviour follows from inherent semantics.
Instances For
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instDecidableEqBindingStatus x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
External distribution ([DW02] (24)–(25)).
- argument : Distribution
- predicate : Distribution
- either : Distribution
Instances For
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instDecidableEqDistribution x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instDecidableEqSem x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instReprSem = { reprPrec := DechaineWiltschko2002.instReprSem.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
D&W's central thesis: binding status is determined by size. A D layer
makes the proform an R-expression (Condition C); a φP top (φ-features but no
D) makes it a bound variable (Condition B); a bare NP is unconstrained by
binding theory. Derived from hasDLayer/hasPhiLayer, not stipulated.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Distribution: DPs are arguments, NPs are predicates, φPs are type-flexible
([DW02] (25): DP → Argument, NP → Predicate).
Equations
Instances For
Inherent semantics: definite (DP), constant (NP), or unspecified (φP).
Equations
Instances For
The size → binding-status entailment #
A proform is an R-expression (Condition C) iff it has a D layer.
A proform is a bound variable (Condition B) iff it has φ-features but no D.
The three categories yield three distinct binding statuses — the typology is non-degenerate.
Case studies ([DW02] table (24)) #
Each language's independent/personal proform instantiates a different category: Halkomelem independent pronouns = pro-DP (R-expressions, Condition C); Shuswap independent pronouns = pro-φP (bound variables, Condition B); Japanese kare = pro-NP (a constant, binding-unconstrained).
Orthogonality to Cardinaletti & Starke deficiency #
[DW02] §3.2 analyses English personal pronouns as
pro-DP (1st/2nd person — they can be determiners: we/us linguists) and pro-φP
(3rd person — *they linguists), and one as pro-NP. Cross-classifying those
categories with [CS99a] deficiency (Pronoun.Strength:
full we/they are strong, enclitic 'em is a clitic) shows the two axes are
independent — neither determines the other.
A pronoun cross-classified on both axes: D&W Category × C&S Strength.
- form : String
- strength : Pronoun.Strength
- category : Category
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- DechaineWiltschko2002.instReprDatum = { reprPrec := DechaineWiltschko2002.instReprDatum.repr }
English inventory ([DW02] §3), each form tagged with its D&W category and its C&S strength.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The Déchaine-Wiltschko categorial axis and the Cardinaletti-Starke deficiency
axis are functionally independent — neither is a function of the other. This
is the theorem behind Pronoun.Strength's docstring claim of orthogonality.