Christopoulos & Zompì 2023: Weak Case Containment #
Three rival featural decompositions of NOM ≺ ACC ≺ DAT, run against two discriminating predictions under Subset-Principle competition. Strong Case Containment (Table 1; [Cah09], [SMX+19]) nests the three cases in a chain; No Case Containment (Table 2) makes them pairwise incomparable; the paper's Weak Case Containment (Table 24) keeps ACC ⊂ DAT but gives NOM its own feature, incomparable to ACC. The predictions:
- *ABA ([Bob12]'s coinage): SCC and WCC exclude it structurally
(
noABA, discharged for both by their shared order-theoretic profile: ACC-appliers persist to DAT, and NOM∩DAT-appliers reach ACC); NCC derives it (ncc_aba_generable, via a rule referencing its ACC-only feature k₃). - Non-Elsewhere Nominative Stems: SCC forces any NOM-applying rule to be
the featureless elsewhere (
scc_nom_forces_empty) — Doric Greek h-stems, Latvian pat-, and English 3sg h- stems refute this; WCC's k₀ writes them directly (Table 25 rows 2–3; the Latvian rules (7) below). [McF18]'s markedness rescue of SCC is refuted on Latvian/Tocharian Gender in the paper's §3.3 (not formalized here).
Table 25's eight derivation rows are reproduced by decide; the Latvian
emphatic pronoun (Table 20, rules (7)) and the Yiddish 1st person (fn. 25) are
run as full stem-distribution checks, including the paper's two minimality
points: pat- needs the singular feature alongside k₀ (fn. 26), and undz
needs k₁ (fn. 25).
Main results #
noABA_scc/noABA_wcc— the genericDecomposition.noABA(*ABA excluded under any decomposition nesting the middle cell) discharged for SCC and WCC bydecideon the order-theoretic hypothesesncc_aba_generable— the two-rule NCC vocabulary generating A B Ascc_nom_forces_empty— SCC has no non-elsewhere nominative rulestable25_row1…table25_row8— the WCC derivation tablelatvian_stems/latvian_gender_blind/latvian_pat_needs_singular— Table 20 under rules (7)yiddish_stems/undz_needs_k1— the fn. 25 paradigm and its k₁ argument
The privative features: k₀–k₃ across the three Case decompositions (Tables 1, 2, 24), plus number (s₀ singular, p₀ plural) and gender features for the empirical paradigms — no property contained in its category-mates (fn. 26).
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqK x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprK = { reprPrec := ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprK.repr }
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqCase3 x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Strong Case Containment (Table 1): a chain ∅ ⊂ {k₁} ⊂ {k₁,k₂}.
Equations
Instances For
No Case Containment (Table 2): pairwise incomparable feature sets; k₃ is the NOM/ACC feature absent from DAT.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.ncc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.nom = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k0, ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k3}
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.ncc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.acc = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k1, ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k3}
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.ncc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.dat = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k1, ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k2}
Instances For
Weak Case Containment (Table 24): ACC ⊂ DAT as in SCC, but NOM carries its own k₀, incomparable to ACC — no k₃.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.wcc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.nom = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k0}
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.wcc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.acc = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k1}
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.wcc ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.dat = {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k1, ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k2}
Instances For
*ABA #
The generic order-theoretic exclusion is Decomposition.noABA: whenever the
middle cell nests between the outer two, a rule winning both outer cells wins the
middle, so no distinct B can interrupt an A_A pattern. It discharges for the two
containment decompositions by decide on the hypotheses; NCC violates the
first (ncc_aba_generable).
*ABA under Weak Case Containment: the paper's Table 24 decomposition keeps SCC's exclusion.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqEx x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprEx = { reprPrec := ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprEx.repr }
ABA is generable under NCC: an elsewhere rule plus a rule referencing {k₁, k₃} — features jointly present only in ACC — yields A B A (the overgeneration of the paper's §2).
Non-Elsewhere Nominative Stems #
Under SCC, a rule applicable in the nominative is featureless — the elsewhere rule. SCC therefore cannot write a Non-Elsewhere Nominative Stem (the paper's §3 problem: Doric h-stems, Latvian pat-, English h-).
Table 25: derivations of AAA, ABB, AAB, ABC under WCC #
Each row's rule inventory, its generated pattern by decide. Rows 5 and 7
use the minimal {k₂} variant of the table's {(k₁,)k₂}. Rows 2–3 are the
NENS derivations — rule A strictly or weakly outranks the elsewhere B.
Latvian pat- ~ paš- (Table 20, rules (7)) #
The emphatic pronoun singles out nominative singular across both genders: pat-s / pat-i against paš- everywhere else. Rules (7): pat- in k₀ singular contexts, paš- elsewhere. Number decomposes with neither value contained in the other (fn. 26); gender features are carried by the cells but referenced by no rule.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqLNum x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprLNum = { reprPrec := ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprLNum.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqLGen x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprLGen = { reprPrec := ChristopoulosZompi2023.instReprLGen.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The Latvian decomposition: WCC for case, s₀/p₀ for number, m₀/f₀ for gender.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Rules (7): pat- in k₀ singular contexts; paš- elsewhere.
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.latvianRules = [{ feats := {ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.k0, ChristopoulosZompi2023.K.s0}, exponent := "pat" }, { feats := ∅, exponent := "paš" }]
Instances For
The stem distribution of Table 20: pat- exactly in the nominative singulars, paš- elsewhere (stems read off pat-s, pat-i, paš-u, paš-am, paš-ai, paš-i, paš-as, paš-us, paš-iem, paš-ām).
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.table20stem c = if c.case = ChristopoulosZompi2023.Case3.nom ∧ c.num = ChristopoulosZompi2023.LNum.sg then "pat" else "paš"
Instances For
Rules (7) generate Table 20's stem distribution.
The pattern "cuts across genders": neither rule references gender, so the distribution is gender-blind.
pat- must be specified for the singular alongside k₀ (fn. 26): dropping s₀ overgenerates pat- into the nominative plural.
Yiddish 1st person (fn. 25): why k₁ exists #
ix (NOM.SG), m- (elsewhere: m-ir, m-ix), undz (ACC.PL and DAT.PL). The undz rule must reference k₁: specified for plural alone it would also capture the nominative plural m-ir. This ABB row with B more specific than the elsewhere is the evidence that WCC's k₁ is not eliminable.
A Yiddish cell: case and number.
Instances For
Equations
- ChristopoulosZompi2023.instDecidableEqYCell.decEq { case := a, num := a_1 } { case := b, num := b_1 } = if h : a = b then h ▸ if h : a_1 = b_1 then h ▸ isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
The Yiddish decomposition: WCC for case, s₀/p₀ for number.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The three stem rules: ix a non-elsewhere nominative-singular stem, undz the k₁-plural stem, m- the elsewhere.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The fn. 25 paradigm's stem distribution: ix / m-ix / m-ir in the singular, m-ir / undz / undz in the plural.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The three rules generate the paradigm.
undz needs k₁ (fn. 25): specified for plural alone, it wrongly beats m- in the nominative plural.