Minimalist Derivations of Word Order #
Verifies that Minimalist Merge derivations model English SVO order: the phonological yield of a transitive derivation comes out subject-verb-object. The transitive derivation is defined locally (chronological discipline: Chomsky 1995 cannot import Adger 2003 where the canonical Minimalism English-derivation lexicon now lives).
Map a verb's complement type to its selectional stack: each c-selected argument is one
Cat feature consumed by complement Merge; nominal arguments are .D (the DP hypothesis).
Folded in from the former Syntax/Minimalist/FromFragments.lean (its only consumer).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A VerbEntry as a SyntacticObject leaf (Cat = .V, selStack from complementType).
Equations
Instances For
A NounEntry as a leaf: proper names project as .D, common nouns as bare .N.
Equations
- Chomsky1995.nounToSO n id = if n.proper = true then Minimalist.SO.mkLeafPhon Minimalist.Cat.D [] n.formSg id else Minimalist.SO.mkLeafPhon Minimalist.Cat.N [] n.formSg id
Instances For
"John sees Mary" as a Minimalist Merge derivation: see's complement
is Mary (emR), then John is added as specifier (emL).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The phonological yield of john_sees_mary is the SVO string
"John sees Mary": the Minimalist derivation (built by emR then
emL over verbToSO/nounToSO) linearizes subject-verb-object via the
derivation-grounded computable externalization (SO.Derivation.surfacePhon).