Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Chomsky1995

Minimalist Derivations of Word Order #

[Cho95]

Verifies that Minimalist Merge derivations model English SVO order: the phonological yield of a transitive derivation comes out subject-verb-object. The transitive derivation is defined locally (chronological discipline: Chomsky 1995 cannot import Adger 2003 where the canonical Minimalism English-derivation lexicon now lives).

Map a verb's complement type to its selectional stack: each c-selected argument is one Cat feature consumed by complement Merge; nominal arguments are .D (the DP hypothesis). Folded in from the former Syntax/Minimalist/FromFragments.lean (its only consumer).

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    A VerbEntry as a SyntacticObject leaf (Cat = .V, selStack from complementType).

    Equations
    Instances For

      A NounEntry as a leaf: proper names project as .D, common nouns as bare .N.

      Equations
      Instances For

        "John sees Mary" as a Minimalist Merge derivation: see's complement is Mary (emR), then John is added as specifier (emL).

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          theorem Chomsky1995.models_svo_word_order :
          " ".intercalate john_sees_mary.surfacePhon = "John sees Mary"

          The phonological yield of john_sees_mary is the SVO string "John sees Mary": the Minimalist derivation (built by emR then emL over verbToSO/nounToSO) linearizes subject-verb-object via the derivation-grounded computable externalization (SO.Derivation.surfacePhon).