Documentation

Linglib.Studies.BeaversKoontzGarboden2020

Beavers & Koontz-Garboden (2020): The Roots of Verbal Meaning #

[BKG20]

The six representative roots of the book's root typology (ch. 5), and the falsification of the Bifurcation Thesis of Roots ([Emb09]; [Ara05]) and of Manner/Result Complementarity ([RHL10]).

Rootmannercauseresultstateposition
√flatcomplement
√blossomcomplement
√crackcomplement
√jogadjoined
√handadjoined
√drowncomplement

The +state cells of √blossom, √crack, √hand, √drown are derived: the book's typology values are the collocational closures (Root.closedKinds) of the base atom kinds, and each closed signature is one of the canonical typology rows (Root.Kinds.pureResult, causativeResult, fullSpec). √blossom falsifies Bifurcation on its own, since change of state is templatic (v_become) content. √hand and √drown additionally falsify Manner/Result Complementarity; they differ only in root position (adjoined vs complement), the contrast carrying the book's account of which root types are attested.

Main declarations #

The six representative roots #

√flat — pure state.

Equations
Instances For

    √jog — pure manner of motion.

    Equations
    Instances For

      √blossom — result with no specified manner or cause (an internally caused change of state).

      Equations
      Instances For

        √crack — caused result without specified manner.

        Equations
        Instances For

          √hand — manner + cause + result, adjoined position. The possession result is non-cancelable ("#Mary handed John the book, but he never got it"), so it is root-entailed rather than implicated ([BKG20] ch. 3).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            √drown — manner of killing (Levin 1993's crucify, drown, hang, electrocute class; [BKG20] ch. 4): manner + cause + result, complement position.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Kind signatures #

              Base signatures record the atom kinds; closed signatures are their collocational closures, and coincide with the canonical rows of the book's typology.

              Falsifying the Bifurcation Thesis #

              √blossom entails change of state — templatic (v_become) content in the root — falsifying Bifurcation without any manner or cause entailment.

              Some root carries templatic content.

              The universal closure of the Bifurcation Thesis is false.

              Falsifying Manner/Result Complementarity #

              √hand entails both a manner (by-hand transfer) and a result (recipient possession).

              √drown entails both a manner (submersion) and a result (death); it differs from √hand in root position.

              Some root entails both a manner and a result.

              The universal closure of Manner/Result Complementarity is false.

              Roots respecting each constraint #

              √flat (pure state) respects Bifurcation: its signature is bounded by the ontological kinds.

              √jog (pure manner) respects Bifurcation.

              √crack (cause + result, no manner) respects Manner/Result Complementarity.

              The roots cash out denotationally ([BKG20] §1.3.2) #

              Threading the roots through the change-of-state denotation (Verb.CosModel): a verb's denotation is dispatched on its root's kinds, so the kinds proven above select the event template and the result entailment of (6) follows from the signature. √crack (+cause+result) entails a result state in any model; √jog (pure manner) does not — the break/hit contrast.

              crack the change-of-state verb (Mary cracked the vase).

              Equations
              Instances For

                jog the pure-manner activity verb (Mary jogged).

                Equations
                Instances For
                  theorem BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.crack_denote_entails_result {Entity : Type u_1} {State : Type u_2} {Time : Type u_3} [LinearOrder Time] (M : Verb.CosModel Entity State Time) (y x : Entity) (e : Event Time) (h : M.denote crackV y x e) :
                  ∃ (e' : Event Time) (s : State), M.become s e' M.rootState crackV x s

                  √crack carries .result, so in any model its denotation entails the result state — the non-cancelable result of [BKG20] (6), derived from crack's signature rather than stipulated.

                  theorem BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.jog_denote_eq_manner {Entity : Type u_1} {State : Type u_2} {Time : Type u_3} [LinearOrder Time] (M : Verb.CosModel Entity State Time) (y x : Entity) :

                  √jog has no .result (nor .cause), so its denotation is the bare manner core — no become, no result state. Only the change-of-state root entails a result.

                  The same contrast at the template level ([RHL98]) #

                  Verb.Root.template reads the event-structure template off a root's collocational closure; the kinds proven above fix it, and HasResultState reduces to carrying result (Verb.Root.template_hasResultState_iff). So the denotational result entailment (√crack) and the template result diagnostic are one fact seen through kinds.

                  √crack's template embeds a result state (it carries result); √jog's does not — the break/hit contrast, now at the template layer and provably the same signature fact as crack_denote_entails_result.

                  theorem BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.crack_template_forces_denote_result {Entity : Type u_1} {State : Type u_2} {Time : Type u_3} [LinearOrder Time] (M : Verb.CosModel Entity State Time) (y x : Entity) (e : Event Time) (h : M.denote crackV y x e) :
                  ∃ (e' : Event Time) (s : State), M.become s e' M.rootState crackV x s

                  √crack's template embeds a result state, so by denote_result_from_template its denotation entails the result state in any model — the template diagnostic and the denotational entailment are one fact through crack's kinds.