Beavers & Koontz-Garboden (2020): The Roots of Verbal Meaning #
The six representative roots of the book's root typology (ch. 5), and the falsification of the Bifurcation Thesis of Roots ([Emb09]; [Ara05]) and of Manner/Result Complementarity ([RHL10]).
| Root | manner | cause | result | state | position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| √flat | ✓ | complement | |||
| √blossom | ✓ | ✓ | complement | ||
| √crack | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | complement | |
| √jog | ✓ | adjoined | |||
| √hand | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | adjoined |
| √drown | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | complement |
The +state cells of √blossom, √crack, √hand, √drown are derived:
the book's typology values are the collocational closures
(Root.closedKinds) of the base atom kinds, and each
closed signature is one of the canonical typology rows
(Root.Kinds.pureResult, causativeResult, fullSpec).
√blossom falsifies Bifurcation on its own, since change of state is
templatic (v_become) content. √hand and √drown additionally falsify
Manner/Result Complementarity; they differ only in root position
(adjoined vs complement), the contrast carrying the book's account of
which root types are attested.
Main declarations #
The six representative roots #
√flat — pure state.
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.flat = { name := "flat", entailments := {Verb.LexEntailment.hasState "flat"} }
Instances For
√jog — pure manner of motion.
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.jog = { name := "jog", entailments := {Verb.LexEntailment.hasManner "jogging-gait"} }
Instances For
√blossom — result with no specified manner or cause (an internally caused change of state).
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.blossom = { name := "blossom", entailments := {Verb.LexEntailment.becomesState "flowering"} }
Instances For
√crack — caused result without specified manner.
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.crack = { name := "crack", entailments := {Verb.LexEntailment.becomesState "fissured", Verb.LexEntailment.hasCause} }
Instances For
√hand — manner + cause + result, adjoined position. The possession result is non-cancelable ("#Mary handed John the book, but he never got it"), so it is root-entailed rather than implicated ([BKG20] ch. 3).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
√drown — manner of killing (Levin 1993's crucify, drown, hang, electrocute class; [BKG20] ch. 4): manner + cause + result, complement position.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Kind signatures #
Base signatures record the atom kinds; closed signatures are their collocational closures, and coincide with the canonical rows of the book's typology.
Falsifying the Bifurcation Thesis #
√blossom entails change of state — templatic (v_become) content
in the root — falsifying Bifurcation without any manner or cause
entailment.
Some root carries templatic content.
The universal closure of the Bifurcation Thesis is false.
Falsifying Manner/Result Complementarity #
√hand entails both a manner (by-hand transfer) and a result (recipient possession).
√drown entails both a manner (submersion) and a result (death); it differs from √hand in root position.
Some root entails both a manner and a result.
The universal closure of Manner/Result Complementarity is false.
Roots respecting each constraint #
√flat (pure state) respects Bifurcation: its signature is bounded by the ontological kinds.
√jog (pure manner) respects Bifurcation.
√crack (cause + result, no manner) respects Manner/Result Complementarity.
The roots cash out denotationally ([BKG20] §1.3.2) #
Threading the roots through the change-of-state denotation (Verb.CosModel): a
verb's denotation is dispatched on its root's kinds, so the kinds
proven above select the event template and the result entailment of (6)
follows from the signature. √crack (+cause+result) entails a result state in
any model; √jog (pure manner) does not — the break/hit contrast.
crack the change-of-state verb (Mary cracked the vase).
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.crackV = { frames := [Frame.np], root := BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.crack, form := "crack" }
Instances For
jog the pure-manner activity verb (Mary jogged).
Equations
- BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.jogV = { frames := [], root := BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.jog, form := "jog" }
Instances For
√crack carries .result, so in any model its denotation entails the
result state — the non-cancelable result of [BKG20]
(6), derived from crack's signature rather than stipulated.
√jog has no .result (nor .cause), so its denotation is the bare manner
core — no become, no result state. Only the change-of-state root entails a
result.
The same contrast at the template level ([RHL98]) #
Verb.Root.template reads the event-structure template off a root's
collocational closure; the kinds proven above fix it, and HasResultState
reduces to carrying result (Verb.Root.template_hasResultState_iff). So the
denotational result entailment (√crack) and the template result diagnostic are
one fact seen through kinds.
√crack's template embeds a result state (it carries result); √jog's does
not — the break/hit contrast, now at the template layer and provably the
same signature fact as crack_denote_entails_result.
√crack's template embeds a result state, so by denote_result_from_template
its denotation entails the result state in any model — the template diagnostic
and the denotational entailment are one fact through crack's kinds.