Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Beavers2010

[Bea10] The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters #

Argument realization in direct/oblique alternations is governed not by event structure but by strength of truth conditions. Direct realization encodes monotonically stronger truth conditions than oblique realization. This is captured by:

  1. An affectedness hierarchy — four degrees of change, each an existential weakening of the last: quantized ⊃ nonquantized ⊃ potential ⊃ unspecified.

  2. L-thematic roles — sets of implicationally related entailments. The three affectedness entailments produce a structured subset hierarchy with exactly 4 semantically non-vacuous roles (of 8 possible).

  3. The Morphosyntactic Alignment Principle (MAP) — when an argument alternates between direct and oblique realization, the direct variant bears L-thematic role R and the oblique bears Q ⊆_M R (minimal weakening).

Deepest theorem #

MAP_holds_all_alternations: for every attested object/oblique alternation in the data, the oblique role is the next-weakest (minimal, ⊆_M) weakening of the direct role. The subset form (direct degree ≥ oblique degree) is the derived corollary MAP_subset / MapHolds.oblique_le, via the substrate's AffectednessDegree order.

An L-thematic role for patienthood: a set of the three affectedness entailments ([Bea10]'s reduction of Dowty's 5 P-Patient entailments).

  • quantized : Bool
  • nonquantized : Bool
  • potential : Bool
Instances For
    def Beavers2010.instDecidableEqPatientLRole.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : PatientLRole) :
    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        An L-role is valid iff it respects the implicational chain quantized → nonquantized → potential.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The four valid L-thematic roles.

          Equations
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For
              Equations
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For

                  Exactly 4 of the 8 combinations are valid: the implicational chain prunes the role space to the four semantically contentful L-roles.

                  Subset ordering on L-thematic roles: R₁ ⊆ R₂ iff every entailment in R₁ is also in R₂.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Strict subset: ⊂

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      The four valid roles form a linear chain under ⊂: {} ⊂ {p} ⊂ {nq,p} ⊂ {q,nq,p}

                      Minimal contrast: Q ⊆_M R iff Q = R or Q ⊂ R with no valid role strictly between them.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        The affectedness degree corresponding to a valid L-thematic role.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          theorem Beavers2010.PatientLRole.subset_iff_toDegree_le (q r : PatientLRole) :
                          q.valid = truer.valid = true(q.subset r = true q.toDegree r.toDegree)

                          The subset order on valid roles is the substrate's AffectednessDegree order, transported along toDegree.

                          def Beavers2010.MAP (directRole obliqueRole : PatientLRole) :
                          Bool

                          The MAP ([Bea10]; canonical wording in Beavers' 2023 Sag Lectures handout): when an argument may be either an object or a PP, it bears role R as an object and the next weakest role Q ⊆_M R as a PP — a minimal weakening, not mere subset.

                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            theorem Beavers2010.MAP_subset (d o : PatientLRole) :
                            MAP d o = trueo.subset d = true

                            Derived corollary of the MAP (the weakened form an earlier version of this file stated as the MAP itself): the oblique role's entailments are a subset of the direct role's.

                            The case the strengthening excludes: a level-skipping weakening (potential oblique under a quantized direct role) satisfies the subset corollary but violates the MAP proper.

                            An observed alternation contrast: a verb with its direct-object and oblique affectedness degrees.

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  eat conative: "ate the pizza" (quantized) vs "ate at the pizza" (nonquantized). The object variant entails total consumption; the oblique entails only some consumption occurred.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    cut conative: "cut the rope" (nonquantized) vs "cut at the rope" (potential). The object variant entails some damage; the oblique entails only that damage was possible (contact under modality).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      hit conative: "hit the rope" (potential) vs "hit at the rope" (unspecified). The object variant entails potential for change (if contact, then possible result); the oblique entails only potential contact under double modality.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        load locative (location as object): "loaded the wagon" (quantized) vs "loaded hay onto the wagon" — the wagon undergoes quantized change (completely filled), the hay undergoes nonquantized change (moved).

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          load locative (theme as object): "loaded the hay" (quantized) vs "loaded the wagon with the hay" — the hay undergoes quantized change (all moved), the wagon undergoes nonquantized change.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            cut/slice locative (location as object): "cut the window with the diamond" (nonquantized) vs "cut the diamond on the window" — both undergo potential change, but the object has nonquantized.

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              cut/slice locative (theme as object): same contrast.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                All attested alternation contrasts.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  The MAP holds of a contrast: the oblique role is the next-weakest (minimal) weakening of the direct role.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For
                                                    @[implicit_reducible]
                                                    Equations

                                                    Degree-level corollary via MAP_subset and the substrate's AffectednessDegree order: the direct degree dominates the oblique.

                                                    The MAP — in its strengthened next-weakest form — holds for ALL attested alternation contrasts: every oblique realization is a minimal weakening of its direct counterpart.

                                                    A hypothetical alternation whose oblique has more entailments than its direct object (potential DO, quantized oblique) — the less prominent realization would carry stronger truth conditions.

                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For

                                                      A level-skipping alternation: quantized direct, potential oblique. Satisfies the subset corollary but not the MAP proper — the degree-level face of skip_violates_MAP.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        A reversed alternation: the oblique strictly outranks the direct.

                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Skipping a level violates the MAP even though the degree order is respected — skip_not_minimal is what excludes it.

                                                          Bridge to [Lev93]'s judgment rows: the conative alternation is attested for cut and hit, confirming the Table 3 contrasts.

                                                          Bridge to [Lev93]'s judgment rows: break does NOT participate in the conative. This is predicted: break objects undergo quantized change (CoS), and the conative would weaken to nonquantized — but break's meaning inherently requires a specific result state, so the weakening is blocked by the verb's lexical semantics.

                                                          Bridge to [Lev93]'s judgment rows: the locative alternation is attested for spray/load verbs, confirming the Table 4 contrasts.

                                                          The profileToDegree bridge (formerly §8) and its verification theorems have been promoted to Semantics/Events/Affectedness.lean. They are opened at the top of this file.

                                                          [Bea10] argues that the MAP and event decompositions are complementary, not competing (the paper's conclusion, §6):

                                                          | Approach        | Semantics                        | Morphosyntax             |
                                                          |-----------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
                                                          | Decompositions  | gross causal/temporal structure   | subject/nonsubject       |
                                                          | MAP             | fine-grained lexical entailments  | direct/oblique           |
                                                          
                                                          The existing `EntailmentProfile` captures the gross agentivity structure
                                                          (P-Agent features → subject selection). Beavers 2010 adds the missing
                                                          piece: fine-grained P-Patient structure → direct/oblique alternations. 
                                                          

                                                          [Gri11]'s PersistenceLevel reformulates P-Patient as 4 persistence dimensions (existential/qualitative × beginning/end). Beavers' affectedness hierarchy maps systematically onto this lattice:

                                                          | Beavers degree   | Grimm persistence    | Interpretation              |
                                                          |------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|
                                                          | quantized        | exPersEnd            | Entity created/consumed     |
                                                          |                  | quPersBeginning      | Entity changed to specific  |
                                                          | nonquantized     | quPersBeginning      | Entity changed (nonspecific)|
                                                          | potential         | totalPersistence     | Entity may change           |
                                                          | unspecified       | totalPersistence     | No change entailment        |
                                                          
                                                          The mapping is not injective: both `quantized` and `nonquantized` can
                                                          map to `quPersBeginning` (the entity changes but persists). The
                                                          distinction between them is about *specificity of the result state*,
                                                          which Grimm's persistence dimensions don't capture — it's a property
                                                          of the scale, not of persistence. This is where the theories are
                                                          genuinely complementary. 
                                                          

                                                          The two Grimm levels that correspond to "affected" roles (quPersBeginning = changed, exPersEnd = created/destroyed) are both ranked lower than totalPersistence on Grimm's lattice. Lower persistence = higher affectedness. This is the Grimm-Beavers convergence.

                                                          Bridge: kick object has persistence totalPersistence (persists, no entailed change) and affectedness potential — exactly the degreeToPersistence correspondence for potential change. Beavers' surface-contact classification ([Bea11] eq. (60c)); note [Gri11]'s own Fig. 5 instead places contact-verb objects at quPersBeginning (TransitivityRank.contact.patientNode), a genuine cross-paper disagreement over whether contact entails impingement.

                                                          Cross-framework bridge from Levin/RHL ArgTemplate (event-template decomposition) to Grimm's GrimmNode (privative agentivity lattice) and Beavers' affectedness degree. Each canonical template is verified to project into the predicted positions in both systems, and the consistency of affectedness ↔ persistence is checked.

                                                          Manner-contact subject → full agent on the Grimm lattice.

                                                          Self-motion (intransitive) → no object affectedness.