Root Arity #
[Coo19]: the central division of labor in Mayan root typology is
that roots determine internal arguments while functional heads
(v/Voice⁰) determine external arguments. Root arity — whether a root
obligatorily projects a theme — is orthogonal to change entailment and
to the B&K-G feature signature, and is the dimension behind the Mayan
"root transitive" class: [Coo19]'s √TV for Chuj, [Luc94]'s
agent-patient salient (=∅) class for Yucatec ("these roots require
two arguments and refer to events involving the action of one entity
on another").
Arity captures complement projection, not semantic type: an unaccusative's sole argument is semantically theme-like, but the root does not project it as a complement.
Main declarations #
Root.Arity—selectsTheme(√TV) vsnoTheme
Root-level argument selection ([Coo19]): does the root
obligatorily take an internal (theme) argument? selectsTheme is
Coon's √TV — the Mayan root-transitive class; noTheme covers
√ITV, √NOM, √POS.
Instances For
Equations
- Verb.Root.instDecidableEqArity x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Verb.Root.instFintypeArity = { elems := { val := ↑Verb.Root.Arity.enumList, nodup := Verb.Root.Arity.enumList_nodup }, complete := Verb.Root.instFintypeArity._proof_1 }
Equations
- Verb.Root.instReprArity.repr Verb.Root.Arity.selectsTheme prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Verb.Root.Arity.selectsTheme")).group prec✝
- Verb.Root.instReprArity.repr Verb.Root.Arity.noTheme prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Verb.Root.Arity.noTheme")).group prec✝
Instances For
Equations
- Verb.Root.instReprArity = { reprPrec := Verb.Root.instReprArity.repr }
Does this root arity entail an obligatory internal argument?