Documentation

Linglib.Semantics.Questions.Partition.Negativity

Negative Attributes via Proper Coarsening #

[Mer99]

Epistemic, syntax-independent characterization of negativity:

[Mer99]: a predicate is negative not because of morphological form (un-, not, etc.) but because its yes/no distinction is strictly coarser than the partition under discussion — answering "does R hold?" discards information q distinguishes.

def QUD.isProperCoarsening {M : Type u_1} [DecidableEq M] (q q' : QUD M) (elements : List M) :

Q is a proper coarsening of Q' over a finite domain iff Q coarsens Q' and has strictly fewer cells.

[Mer99] defines negative attributes via proper coarsening: R is a negative attribute with respect to partition F iff for some Q ∈ F, {R, Q} is a proper coarsening of F. This characterization is purely epistemic and syntax-independent — negativity is a matter of partition kinetics, not morphological form.

Equations
Instances For
    def QUD.isNegativeAttribute {M : Type u_1} [DecidableEq M] (R : MBool) (q : QUD M) (elements : List M) :

    A predicate R is a negative attribute with respect to partition Q over a finite domain iff the binary partition of R is a proper coarsening of Q.

    [Mer99]: negativity is not a syntactic property (presence of "un-", "not", etc.) but a partition-kinetic one. R is negative relative to Q when the R/¬R distinction is strictly coarser than Q's partition — answering whether R holds loses information that Q distinguishes.

    Equations
    Instances For