Documentation

Linglib.Semantics.Questions.Bias.Defs

Polar Question Bias — vocabulary #

[Rom24] [RH04] [Lad81] [BG00]

Theory-neutral vocabulary for polar question bias, shared by lexical fragments and the theory layer. Polar questions come in three forms — PosQ, LoNQ, HiNQ — sensitive to two independent bias dimensions: original speaker bias (the speaker's prior epistemic lean) and contextual evidence bias (evidence available in the current discourse).

This file carries only the directional enums and the form/bias compatibility tables, so that Fragment lexical entries can record which bias a particle requires without importing the modal machinery (VERUM/FALSUM, □_ev) that lives in Semantics.Questions.Bias.Basic.

Main definitions #

The three polar question forms ([Rom24] §1).

These forms are cross-linguistically attested and constitute the fundamental typology for polar question bias research.

  • PosQ : PQForm

    Positive question: [p?]. "Is Jane coming?"

  • LoNQ : PQForm

    Low negation question: [not p?]. "Is Jane not coming?"

  • HiNQ : PQForm

    High negation question: [n't p?]. "Isn't Jane coming?" In Czech: interrogative (VSO) word order.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Original speaker bias: belief or expectation that p is true, based on the speaker's epistemic state prior to the current situation and exchange.

      • forP : OriginalBias

        Speaker originally expected/believed p.

      • neutral : OriginalBias

        Speaker had no prior expectation about p.

      • againstP : OriginalBias

        Speaker originally expected/believed ¬p.

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Contextual evidence bias ([BG00]): expectation about p induced by evidence available in the current discourse situation. A felicity condition on rising declaratives and a bias dimension for polar questions.

          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Strength of contextual-evidence bias associated with a negation scope, bridging Romero's typology to Staňková's three-way Czech distinction: inner negation → strong (□_ev(¬p)), medial → weak (¬□_ev(p)), outer (FALSUM) → no □_ev involvement.

              Instances For
                @[implicit_reducible]
                Equations
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Original speaker bias conditions on PQ forms ([Rom24] Table 1).

                  Only HiNQ mandatorily conveys original speaker bias for p. LoNQ can convey bias for p but can also be neutral. PosQ is compatible with bias for ¬p or neutrality but was not tested for bias for p.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Contextual evidence bias conditions on PQ forms ([Rom24] Table 2, [BG00]).

                    PosQ requires evidence for p (or neutral). LoNQ requires evidence against p. Outer-HiNQ is felicitous with neutral or against-p evidence.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      HiNQs are felicitous with evidence against p (contradiction scenarios).

                      HiNQs are also felicitous with neutral evidence (suggestion scenarios).