Strong and weak necessity #
Von Fintel and Iatridou distinguish two necessity forces over Kratzer's conversational
backgrounds. Strong necessity (must, have to) is necessity over the best accessible worlds
(strongNecessity); weak necessity (ought, should) is necessity over the best of those
under a secondary ordering source (weakNecessity), the lexicographic refinement in which a
later ordering source undoes the ties left by an earlier one. Selecting within the best worlds
can only shrink the domain, so strong necessity entails weak necessity (strong_entails_weak)
and not conversely (weak_not_entails_strong); with an empty secondary ordering source the two
coincide (weak_eq_strong_no_secondary).
References #
Strong necessity, must φ, is Kratzer's necessity over the best accessible worlds.
Equations
- Modality.Directive.strongNecessity f g p w = Modality.necessity f g p w
Instances For
Weak necessity, ought φ, is necessity over the g'-best of the g-best accessible
worlds.
Equations
- Modality.Directive.weakNecessity f g g' p w = ∀ w' ∈ (Modality.premisePreorder (g' w)).minimals (Modality.bestWorlds f g w), p w'
Instances For
Strong necessity entails weak necessity: the g'-best of the g-best worlds are
g-best.
Weak necessity does not entail strong necessity: with two tied accessible worlds and a
secondary ordering source singling out the one where p holds, ought p is true and must p
false.
With an empty secondary ordering source, weak necessity is strong necessity.