Pragmatic usability of trivalent propositions #
[Kri16]'s pragmatics over Trivalent.Prop3: a proposition is
sufficientlyTrue at a world when its issue cell contains a literally-true
world, addressesIssue when no cell straddles the true/false boundary, and
usable when it is not false, sufficiently true, and addresses the issue.
Non-maximal readings are exactly usability at gap-worlds
(gap_enables_nonmax); gap removal blocks them
(metaAssert_prevents_nonmax); tolerated exceptions cannot be mentioned
(exception_unaddressable). communicatedContent is what the hearer
learns; strong relevance ([KS21b]) is the bivalent counterpart
of Addressing.
Main definitions #
sufficientlyTrue,addressesIssue,usable: Križ's weakened Quality.communicatedContent: worlds compatible with what is communicated.isStronglyRelevantProp: constancy on issue cells.bivalentPred:Bool-valued truth predicate of a bivalent proposition.
References #
p is "true enough" at w relative to issue q: some q-equivalent
world makes p literally true. This weakens the maxim of Quality — a
speaker need only assert something equivalent, for current purposes, to
something true.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.sufficientlyTrue q p w = ∃ (w' : W), q.r w w' ∧ p w' = Trivalent.true
Instances For
Literal truth implies sufficient truth, for any issue.
p addresses issue q when no cell of q overlaps both the positive
and the negative extension. Gap-worlds are invisible: only cells
straddling the true/false boundary disqualify.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.addressesIssue q p = ¬∃ (w₁ : W) (w₂ : W), q.r w₁ w₂ ∧ p w₁ = Trivalent.true ∧ p w₂ = Trivalent.false
Instances For
p may be used at w: it is not false at w, sufficiently true at
w, and addresses the issue.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.usable q p w = (p w ≠ Trivalent.false ∧ Semantics.Homogeneity.sufficientlyTrue q p w ∧ Semantics.Homogeneity.addressesIssue q p)
Instances For
Equations
For a bivalent proposition, usability is literal truth plus addressing: sufficient truth adds nothing without gap-worlds.
Usability at gap-worlds #
The gap enables non-maximal use: a gapped world whose cell contains a true-world is usable, given addressing.
Gap removal forces literal truth for usability: the general form of the headline result that homogeneity removers prevent non-maximal use.
Unmentionability of exceptions ([Kri16] §4.1): when p is used at
w under issue q, an exception-mentioning sentence e — true at w
but false wherever p is literally true — cannot address the same
issue. w's cell contains a literally-true world, and e straddles the
true/false boundary between w and that world.
Communicated content #
The worlds the hearer considers possible after hearing p under issue
q: those indistinguishable, for current purposes, from a world where
p is literally true.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.communicatedContent q p = {w : W | Semantics.Homogeneity.sufficientlyTrue q p w}
Instances For
Literal truth is always communicated.
For a bivalent proposition that addresses the issue, communicated content is exactly the positive extension: no pragmatic weakening.
Coarser issues communicate more: if q' refines q, everything
communicated under q' is communicated under q. This is
[Kri16]'s key prediction that coarse issues enable non-maximal
use.
Strong relevance #
Bivalent counterpart of addressesIssue, from [KS21b]: a
W → Prop is strongly relevant to an issue when it is constant on each
cell. The bivalent bridge to addressesIssue is
KrizSpector2021.bivalent_addressing_iff_stronglyRelevant.
A proposition is strongly relevant to an issue iff it is constant on each cell of the partition.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.isStronglyRelevantProp q p = ∀ (w₁ w₂ : W), q.r w₁ w₂ → (p w₁ ↔ p w₂)
Instances For
Filter a set of propositions to those strongly relevant to q.
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.stronglyRelevantSet q candidates = {p : W → Prop | p ∈ candidates ∧ Semantics.Homogeneity.isStronglyRelevantProp q p}
Instances For
With the trivial QUD, strong relevance is constancy on W.
With the exact QUD, every proposition is strongly relevant.
With the exact QUD, the strongly-relevant filter is the identity.
The Bool truth predicate of a proposition. Bridges the trivalent
Addressing constraint to bivalent strong-relevance filtering
([KS21b]).
Equations
- Semantics.Homogeneity.bivalentPred p w = (p w == Trivalent.true)