DirectlySubordinate K' K says K' is a sub-box of one of K's conditions, by the neg
case of Def. 1.4.10(i), the ⇒ cases of Def. 2.1.2 (which subordinates both components of a
conditional to the containing DRS), and the ∨ cases of Def. 2.4.3(i)(c), where no disjunct is
subordinate to another. It is a relation on DRS values, where the textbook's is on box
occurrences. Every clause pins the containing box in its conclusion, since an unpinned clause
(such as consequent-below-antecedent) would hold of every pair of DRSs via a manufactured
container. The ⇒ visibility asymmetry is not subordination but accessibility.
- neg {L : FirstOrder.Language} {V : Type w} {D K : DRS L V} : Condition.neg K ∈ D.conditions → DirectlySubordinate K D
The body of a
¬is directly subordinate to the containing DRS. - impAnte {L : FirstOrder.Language} {V : Type w} {D a c : DRS L V} : Condition.imp a c ∈ D.conditions → DirectlySubordinate a D
The antecedent of a
⇒is directly subordinate to the containing DRS. - impCons {L : FirstOrder.Language} {V : Type w} {D a c : DRS L V} : Condition.imp a c ∈ D.conditions → DirectlySubordinate c D
The consequent of a
⇒is directly subordinate to the containing DRS. - disL {L : FirstOrder.Language} {V : Type w} {D l r : DRS L V} : Condition.dis l r ∈ D.conditions → DirectlySubordinate l D
The left disjunct of a
∨is directly subordinate to the containing DRS. - disR {L : FirstOrder.Language} {V : Type w} {D l r : DRS L V} : Condition.dis l r ∈ D.conditions → DirectlySubordinate r D
The right disjunct of a
∨is directly subordinate to the containing DRS.
Used by Subordinate, WeakSubordinate, DirectlySubordinate.sizeOf_lt
Used in KampReyle1993