Effective-preference desire semantics #
a wants φ holds at w iff some maximal preference of a's preferential background
P a w stands in a designated relation to φ — [CL16]'s analysis,
where the background plays the role of a Kratzerian conversational background
([CL11], [CL12], [Lau13], [LC14]).
The relation fixes the reading: identity is the canonical exact-match reading (Want);
reverse inclusion gives a preference satisfied if φ holds (WantSufficient, their
success-oriented reading), which is downward entailing in φ; inclusion gives a
preference satisfied only if φ holds (WantNecessary, their Quine–Hintikka reading),
which is upward entailing. Blocking of simultaneous want φ and want ¬φ over a
consistent background is PreferenceStructure.maxElts_pair_belief_compatible.
Exact-match want: φ itself is a maximal preference, φ ∈ max[P(a, w)].
Equations
- Desire.Preferential.Want P a φ w = (φ ∈ (P a w).maxElts)
Instances For
Some maximal preference is entailed by φ: a preference satisfied if φ holds.
Equations
- Desire.Preferential.WantSufficient P a φ w = ∃ p ∈ (P a w).maxElts, φ ⊆ p
Instances For
Some maximal preference entails φ: a preference satisfied only if φ holds.
Equations
- Desire.Preferential.WantNecessary P a φ w = ∃ p ∈ (P a w).maxElts, p ⊆ φ