The Dowty→Grimm projection ([Gri11] §2.1) #
The morphisms from [Dow91]'s EntailmentProfile to [Gri11]'s
lattice objects: Agentivity.fromEntailmentProfile (the four P-Agent
features minus independent existence), PersistenceLevel.fromPatientProfile
(the P-Patient entailments read as persistence), and their pairing
ParticipantType.fromSubjectProfile / fromObjectProfile.
The consistency theorems make the projection exact: its kernel
(fromEntailmentProfile_eq_iff), its monotonicity, the decomposition of
Dowty's flat count through it (pAgentScore_decomposition), dominance as
lattice order plus independent existence (pAgentDominates_iff), and the
Argument Selection Principle as lattice dominance
(outranks_of_lattice_dominance).
Map Dowty's P-Agent entailments to Grimm's agentivity features.
The correspondence is direct for 3 of 4 features:
- volition = volition
- sentience = sentience
- causation → instigation (p.521)
- movement = motion
Independent existence is handled by the persistence dimension.
Equations
Instances For
Two profiles project to the same agentivity node iff they agree on the four lattice features: the projection drops independent existence and all five Proto-Patient entailments ([Gri11] §2.1 recasts them on the persistence axis).
Map Dowty's P-Patient entailments to Grimm's persistence level.
This is an approximate mapping — Grimm's system is genuinely different from Dowty's. The diagnostic features:
- DE + IT → exPersEnd: entity created incrementally (build, invent)
- DE + ¬IT → exPersBeginning: entity ceases to exist (die, evaporate)
- IT + ¬DE → exPersBeginning: entity consumed incrementally (eat)
- CoS + ¬IT + ¬DE → quPersBeginning: changed but persists (move, dim)
- ¬CoS + ¬DE → totalPersistence or totalNonPersistence
Dowty's DE ("does not exist independently of the event") maps to Grimm's creation/destruction axis. IT (incremental theme) disambiguates: DE+IT = creation (exPersEnd), DE+¬IT = destruction (exPersBeginning).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Map a full EntailmentProfile to a ParticipantType.
The agentivity features come from the P-Agent entailments; the persistence level comes from the P-Patient entailments.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Grimm ↔ Dowty ASP consistency #
Grimm's agentivity lattice ordering is consistent with Dowty's PAgentDominates: if Grimm a ≤ Grimm b on agentivity, then Dowty a dominates Dowty b on P-Agent features.
This holds because the feature-to-feature mapping is a bijection on the first 4 P-Agent features (volition, sentience, causation=instigation, movement=motion).
The Dowty→Grimm projection is monotone: if one EntailmentProfile dominates another on P-Agent features, the projected agentivity values are ordered.
Dominance is lattice order plus independent existence #
[Dow91]'s five P-Agent entailments (Table 1 of [Gri11]) split into
[Gri11]'s four agentivity primitives (Table 2) plus independent
existence, which Grimm recasts on the persistence axis (§2.1). The three
theorems below make the split exact: the flat count decomposes through the
projection, the lattice's feature count is monotone in the inclusion order
(§2.3: higher in the lattice = higher degree of agentivity), and Dowty's
PAgentDominates is precisely lattice order plus an independent-existence
implication (§2.2).
Feature count is monotone in the inclusion order ([Gri11] §2.3): ascending the Fig. 1 lattice never loses agentivity features.
Dowty's flat P-Agent count decomposes through the projection: the four lattice features ([Gri11] Table 2) plus independent existence, the one Table 1 entailment Grimm moves to the persistence axis (§2.1).
Dowty's subset dominance is exactly Grimm's lattice order plus an
independent-existence implication ([Gri11] §2.2, Fig. 1): the
projection loses no dominance information. Derived from
fromEntailmentProfile_monotone and
grimm_agentivity_consistent_with_dowty.
[Gri11]'s Argument Selection Principle as lattice dominance: if
subj's agentivity node strictly dominates obj's and independent
existence is preserved, subj is selected — for every profile pair,
via pAgentDominates_iff, not per-verb checking.