Decision-Theoretic Semantics: "But" ([Mer99a] §4) #
Merin's DTS account of adversative conjunction. The felicity of "A but B" requires that A and B have opposite relevance signs, and that the conjunction A∧B is negatively relevant (the "but"-clause wins). The default interpretation sets H = B, yielding unexpected-B-given-A.
Key Definitions #
butFelicitous(Hypothesis 4): felicity conditions for "A but B"NNIR(Def. 10): Non-Negative Instantial RelevancedefaultButCtx: the default interpretation where H = B
Main Results #
- Theorem 8: CIP + contrariness → unexpectedness (P(B∣A) < P(B))
- Theorem 9: When H = B, CIP holds automatically
- Theorem 10: Negative relevance implies unexpectedness in default-but
- Corollary 11 (Harris universal): NNIR prevents "Qa but Qb"
Felicity conditions for "but" #
Hypothesis 4: Felicity conditions for "A but B".
"A but B" is felicitous iff: (i) A is positively relevant to H, (ii) B is negatively relevant to H, (iii) A∧B is negatively relevant to H (B "wins").
Equations
- DTS.But.butFelicitous ctx a b = (DTS.posRelevant ctx a ∧ DTS.negRelevant ctx b ∧ DTS.negRelevant ctx (a ∩ b))
Instances For
Non-Negative Instantial Relevance (NNIR) #
Definition 10: Non-Negative Instantial Relevance (NNIR).
For a predicate Q over entities, observing Q(a) never makes Q(b) less probable: P(Q(b)∣Q(a)) ≥ P(Q(b)) for all a, b.
This captures a cross-linguistic universal: properties are positively correlated across instances (knowing one dog is friendly makes it more likely another is).
Equations
- DTS.But.NNIR E μ Q = ∀ (a b : E), μ (Q b) ≤ μ[Q b | Q a]
Instances For
Default but (H = B) #
Default "but" context: the issue is identified with the but-clause itself (H = B).
Merin argues this is the preferred interpretation when no explicit issue is provided.
Equations
- DTS.But.defaultButCtx μ b hb = { topic := b, topicMeasurable := hb, prior := μ }
Instances For
Theorems #
Theorem 8: CIP + contrariness implies unexpectedness.
If A and B are conditionally independent given H and ¬H, and have opposite relevance signs, then P(B∣A) < P(B) — B is unexpected given A.
CIP turns the total-probability decompositions of P(A∧B), P(A), and P(B) into a factorized cross-product whose factors contrariness makes jointly positive.
Theorem 9: When H = B, issue-conditional independence holds automatically for any A.
P(A∧B∣B) = P(A∣B)·P(B∣B) because B∧(A∧B) = B∧A and P(B∣B) = 1, and P(A∧B∣¬B) = P(A∣¬B)·P(B∣¬B) because both sides vanish on ¬B.
Theorem 10: Negative relevance implies unexpectedness in default-but.
When the issue is B itself and A is negatively relevant to H = B, then P(B∣A) < P(B) — B is unexpected given A.
Corollary 11 (Harris universal): NNIR prevents "Qa but Qb".
In the default-but interpretation with a live antecedent Q(b), the issue is
Q(b) itself: P(Q(b)∣Q(b)) = 1 while P(Q(b)∣¬Q(b)) = 0, so the Bayes factor
is genuinely infinite — Q(b) cannot be negatively relevant to itself,
violating butFelicitous.
Theorem 13 (not formalized): Savage-Kemeny-Gaifman-Humburg theorem.
Symmetric probability on finite models extends to infinite models only if NNIR holds, providing a foundational justification for NNIR as a rationality constraint. Requires de Finetti-style exchangeability arguments.
Reference: Gaifman, H. & Snir, M. (1982). Probabilities over rich languages.